A Strategy for Assessing Exposures with Reference to Multiple Limits

Abstract This article addresses the problem of assessing exposures to chemical agents which are regulated with multiple limits such as a permissible exposure limit (PEL) and an action level (AL). If exposures are described adequately by a lognormal distribution, the mean exposure is correlated with the frequency of large excursions above any particular value. This implies that by controlling the mean value below the lower exposure limit, one can constrain the frequency of exposures above the upper limit and vice versa. For example, if the mean exposure is maintained below the AL = 0.5 (PEL), then a maximum of 12 percent of the lognormally-distributed exposures are expected to exceed the PEL regardless of the degree of temporal variability. Furthermore, this property is independent of the averaging time of the measurements, thus samples collected over eight hours or longer can be used to limit the frequency of exposures in excess of a short-term exposure limit (STEL). Several applications regarding pairs o...

[1]  R. Spear,et al.  Physiological damping of exposure variability during brief periods. , 1988, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[2]  B. Préat.  Application of geostatistical methods for estimation of the dispersion variance of occupational exposures. , 1987, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[3]  Steve Selvin,et al.  Benzene Exposure in the Petroleum Refining Industry , 1987 .

[4]  S M Rappaport,et al.  A method for evaluating the mean exposure from a lognormal distribution. , 1987, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[5]  S Selvin,et al.  A note on the assessment of exposure using one-sided tolerance limits. , 1987, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[6]  R C Spear,et al.  The influence of averaging time on the distribution of exposures. , 1986, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[7]  S M Rappaport,et al.  The rules of the game: an analysis of OSHA's enforcement strategy. , 1984, American journal of industrial medicine.

[8]  R. M. Tuggle,et al.  Assessment of occupational exposure using one-sided tolerance limits , 1982 .

[9]  R. Rando,et al.  Critical evaluation of continuous monitors for toluene diisocyanate. , 1980, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[10]  S A Roach,et al.  A most rational basis for air sampling programmes. , 1977, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[11]  A. R. Jones,et al.  A statistical technique for determining compliance with dual hygienic standards. , 1976, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[12]  K. A. Busch,et al.  Exposure measurement action level and occupational environmental variability , 1975 .

[13]  R J Sherwood,et al.  The monitoring of benzene exposure by air sampling. , 1971, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[14]  R S Brief,et al.  Evaluating benzene exposures. , 1971, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[15]  S A Roach,et al.  A more rational basis for air sampling programs. , 1966, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[16]  J. Aitchison,et al.  The Lognormal Distribution. , 1958 .