Influence of the bucket geometry on the Pelton performance

The increasing share of hydropower in world electricity production requires the development of standardized and optimized design procedures leading to increasingly higher efficiency values. To date, despite a certain amount of support from computational fluid dynamics, Pelton turbines are still characterized by semiempirical design criteria that do not make it possible to optimize the jet–bucket interaction in order to maximize turbine performance. Based on an analysis of particle flow tracks, this paper presents a hybrid Eulerian–Lagrangian method to investigate the influence of bucket geometry on the Pelton efficiency at two different operating conditions. Jet–bucket interaction was numerically analyzed by means of a traditional mesh-based numerical approach, using a transient multi-phase homogeneous model. Subsequently, the numerical results were integrated using a predictor–corrector algorithm, combining a fourth order Adams-Bashforth method as predictor and a fourth order Adams-Moulton method as corrector, in order to determine the fluid particle trajectories on the rotating buckets. The particle flow tracks were analyzed in detail to evaluate the single-particle performance in terms of discharged kinetic energy, momentum variation, and total energy variation during the jet–bucket interaction. Moreover, on the basis of the particle discharging position, the contribution of the different bucket areas to the total torque of the turbine was investigated to determine the time-depending influence of the bucket geometry on the turbine energy exchange and to suggest possible design solutions for improving bucket performance.

[1]  Ernst Hairer,et al.  Solving Ordinary Differential Equations I: Nonstiff Problems , 2009 .

[2]  F. Menter Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications , 1994 .

[3]  Francis Leboeuf,et al.  Numerical simulation of the flow in a Pelton turbine using the meshless method smoothed particle hydrodynamics: A new simple solid boundary treatment , 2007 .

[4]  Zh Zhang,et al.  Experimental studies of the jet of a Pelton turbine , 2007 .

[5]  Miroslav Nechleba,et al.  Hydraulic turbines : their design and equipment , 1957 .

[6]  Morten Hana Numerical analysis of non-stationary free surface flow in a Pelton bucket , 1999 .

[7]  T. Coakley,et al.  Turbulence Modeling Validation, Testing, and Development , 1997 .

[8]  Zh Zhang Analytical method for frictional flows in a Pelton turbine , 2009 .

[9]  Zh Zhang Flow interactions in Pelton turbines and the hydraulic efficiency of the turbine system , 2007 .

[10]  Alexandre Perrig,et al.  Hydrodynamics of the free surface flow in Pelton turbine buckets , 2007 .

[11]  François Avellan,et al.  Numerical and Experimental Analysis of free Surface Flow in a 3D non Rotating Pelton Bucket , 2002 .

[12]  Zh. Zhang,et al.  1 LDA application and the dual-measurement-method in experimental investigations of the free surface jet at a model nozzle of a Pelton turbine , 2002 .

[13]  Francis Leboeuf,et al.  Free surface flows simulations in Pelton turbines using an hybrid SPH-ALE method , 2010 .

[14]  R. Mack,et al.  Numerical Investigation of the Flow in a Pelton Turbine , 2002 .

[15]  Zh Zhang Flow dynamics of the free surface flow in the rotating buckets of a Pelton turbine , 2009 .

[16]  Giovanna Cavazzini,et al.  Numerical investigation of the interaction between jet and bucket in a Pelton turbine , 2009 .

[17]  Etienne Parkinson,et al.  Flow in a Pelton Turbine Bucket: Numerical and Experimental , 2006 .

[18]  Pierre Leroy,et al.  Flow Analysis Inside a Pelton Turbine Bucket , 2006 .

[19]  Zh Zhang Inlet flow conditions and the jet impact work in a Pelton turbine , 2009 .