Trends in characteristics of sub‐daily heavy precipitation and rainfall erosivity in the Czech Republic

In this paper, we analyse observed changes in characteristics of sub-daily heavy summer precipitation and erosive precipitation events for the Czech Republic, taking into consideration 51 years of data (1961–2011) for 17 stations. The sub-daily data were checked for consistency with the daily control records, and unreliable data were removed from the data set. Subsequently, four statistical tests were applied to assess the homogeneity of the data set. The trend magnitude was estimated using the Theil–Sen slope estimator, and two tests were applied to evaluate its significance. For most of the indices, the tests did not indicate inhomogeneity, with the exception of characteristics related to rainfall intensity. The trends are positive for most of the stations and most precipitation characteristics, and significant positive trends are much more frequent than negative trends. The analysis revealed a significant increase in the contribution of heavy precipitation to the precipitation total in half of the stations at short aggregation levels.

[1]  H. Fowler,et al.  Future changes to the intensity and frequency of short‐duration extreme rainfall , 2014 .

[2]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  A compilation of data on European flash floods , 2009 .

[3]  Anders Moberg,et al.  Daily dataset of 20th‐century surface air temperature and precipitation series for the European Climate Assessment , 2002 .

[4]  A. K. Tank,et al.  An Alternative Index for the Contribution of Precipitation on Very Wet Days to the Total Precipitation , 2014 .

[5]  M. Hanel,et al.  Spatial variability and interdependence of rain event characteristics in the Czech Republic , 2013 .

[6]  Jan Kyselý,et al.  Trends of Convective and Stratiform Precipitation in the Czech Republic, 1982–2010 , 2014 .

[7]  P. Willems,et al.  Trends and multidecadal oscillations in rainfall extremes, based on a more than 100‐year time series of 10 min rainfall intensities at Uccle, Belgium , 2008 .

[8]  A. Dijk,et al.  Rainfall intensity kinetic energy relationships: a critical literature appraisal , 2002 .

[9]  G. Blöschl,et al.  The June 2013 flood in the Upper Danube Basin, and comparisons with the 2002, 1954 and 1899 floods , 2013 .

[10]  A. K. Tank,et al.  Trends in Indices of Daily Temperature and Precipitation Extremes in Europe, 1946–99 , 2003 .

[11]  J. Kyselý.  Trends in heavy precipitation in the Czech Republic over 1961–2005 , 2009 .

[12]  Valérie Ventura,et al.  Controlling the Proportion of Falsely Rejected Hypotheses when Conducting Multiple Tests with Climatological Data , 2004 .

[13]  H. B. Mann.  Nonparametric Tests Against Trend , 1945 .

[14]  J. Neumann.  Distribution of the Ratio of the Mean Square Successive Difference to the Variance , 1941 .

[15]  D. Karoly,et al.  Non-stationarity in daily and sub-daily intense rainfall – Part 1: Sydney, Australia , 2011 .

[16]  M. Borga,et al.  Characterisation of selected extreme flash floods in Europe and implications for flood risk management , 2010 .

[17]  T. A. Buishand,et al.  SOME METHODS FOR TESTING THE HOMOGENEITY OF RAINFALL RECORDS , 1982 .

[18]  H. Alexandersson.  A homogeneity test applied to precipitation data , 1986 .

[19]  T. A. Buishand,et al.  Trends in European precipitation extremes over 1951–2010 , 2012 .

[20]  Panos Panagos,et al.  Spatial and temporal variability of rainfall erosivity factor for Switzerland , 2011 .

[21]  K. Kunkel,et al.  Changes in Instruments and Sites Affecting Historical Weather Records: A Case Study , 2006 .

[22]  Patrick Willems,et al.  Multidecadal oscillatory behaviour of rainfall extremes in Europe , 2013, Climatic Change.

[23]  E. Xoplaki,et al.  A note on the use of the standard normal homogeneity test to detect inhomogeneities in climatic time series , 2011 .

[24]  Peter Fiener,et al.  Long-term trends in rainfall erosivity–analysis of high resolution precipitation time series (1937–2007) from Western Germany , 2013 .

[25]  E. Łupikasza,et al.  Regional and seasonal variability of extreme precipitation trends in southern Poland and central‐eastern Germany 1951–2006 , 2011 .

[26]  Christian Salles,et al.  Long‐term (105 years) variability in rain erosivity as derived from 10‐min rainfall depth data for Ukkel (Brussels, Belgium): Implications for assessing soil erosion rates , 2006 .

[27]  J. Kyselý,et al.  Return periods of the August 2010 heavy precipitation in northern Bohemia (Czech Republic) in the present climate and under climate change , 2013 .

[28]  G. Können,et al.  Homogeneity of 20th century European daily temperature and precipitation series , 2003 .

[29]  Jan Kyselý,et al.  Climate-change effects on extreme precipitation in central Europe: uncertainties of scenarios based on regional climate models , 2009 .

[30]  J. Kyselý,et al.  Comparison of regional and at‐site approaches to modelling probabilities of heavy precipitation , 2011 .

[31]  A. Pettitt.  A Non‐Parametric Approach to the Change‐Point Problem , 1979 .

[32]  P. Jones,et al.  Trends in indices for extremes in daily temperature and precipitation in central and western Europe, 1901–99 , 2005 .

[33]  H. Y. Mok,et al.  Scaling and trends of hourly precipitation extremes in two different climate zones – Hong Kong and the Netherlands , 2011 .

[34]  F. Fujibe.  Clausius–Clapeyron‐like relationship in multidecadal changes of extreme short‐term precipitation and temperature in Japan , 2013 .

[35]  Daniel S. Wilks,et al.  On “Field Significance” and the False Discovery Rate , 2006 .

[36]  Jan Kyselý,et al.  Disaggregating convective and stratiform precipitation from station weather data , 2013 .