Experimental validation of a numerical thermal model of the EBM process for Ti6Al4V

Abstract Electron Beam Melting (EBM) is an additive manufacturing (AM) process that uses an electron beam to melt metallic powders. Although the use of an electron beam in the AM field is relatively recent, several applications are already available in the aerospace and medical fields. To increase the applicability of the EBM process and to make it more reliable, different modelling techniques will be helpful tools. Modelling may have the potential to reduce the optimization time when compared with experimental trial and error approaches. In fact, by means of numerical modelling, process stability could be reached by exploring virtually what-if scenarios. However, experimental validation is necessary to ensure the accuracy of the modelling. The aim of this paper is to provide a validation of the effectiveness and reliability of a Finite Element (FE) thermal model by comparing numerical results and experimental measurements. Two different scanning strategies were studied: MultiBeam and continuous line melting. In MultiBeam melting, separated short melt lines (MultiBeam lines) are activated at different points along the predefined melt track. The electron beam jumps sequentially between the short lines until a complete melt track is finished. Continuous line melting means that the complete predefined melt track is melted from the start point to the stop point in one single sequence. The following parameters were investigated: beam speed, beam size and length of MultiBeam lines. A novel experimental setup was used in which single line tracks were melted in an Arcam Q10 system. Standard Arcam Ti6Al4V powder was used and the layer thickness was set to 0.05 mm. Microscope images were used to acquire the width of the melt pool at different positions along the melt tracks. The experiments were replicated by numerical simulations and a good agreement between simulations and experimental data was found.

[1]  Eleonora Atzeni,et al.  On the effect of process parameters on properties of AlSi10Mg parts produced by DMLS , 2014 .

[2]  Robert F. Singer,et al.  In situ flaw detection by IR‐imaging during electron beam melting , 2012 .

[3]  Paul Steinmann,et al.  Macroscopic simulation and experimental measurement of melt pool characteristics in selective electron beam melting of Ti-6Al-4V , 2017 .

[4]  Feng Lin,et al.  Direct metal part forming of 316L stainless steel powder by electron beam selective melting , 2006 .

[5]  A. Mitchell,et al.  Melting, casting and forging problems in titanium alloys , 1998 .

[6]  Ninggang Shen,et al.  Simulations of Thermo-Mechanical Characteristics in Electron Beam Additive Manufacturing , 2012 .

[7]  F. Froes,et al.  The Additive Manufacturing (AM) of Titanium Alloys , 2014 .

[8]  Robert F. Singer,et al.  Processing window and evaporation phenomena for Ti–6Al–4V produced by selective electron beam melting , 2014 .

[9]  Feng Lin,et al.  Scanning method of filling lines in electron beam selective melting , 2007 .

[10]  Eleonora Atzeni,et al.  Modelling energy source and powder properties for the development of a thermal FE model of the EBM additive manufacturing process , 2017 .

[11]  Luca Iuliano,et al.  A literature review of powder-based electron beam melting focusing on numerical simulations , 2018 .

[12]  C. Körner,et al.  Additive manufacturing of metallic components by selective electron beam melting — a review , 2016 .

[13]  Robert F. Singer,et al.  Selective Electron Beam Melting of Cellular Titanium: Mechanical Properties , 2008 .

[14]  Bo Cheng,et al.  On Process Temperature in Powder-Bed Electron Beam Additive Manufacturing: Model Development and Validation , 2014 .

[15]  Iain Todd,et al.  XCT analysis of the influence of melt strategies on defect population in Ti?6Al?4V components manufactured by Selective Electron Beam Melting , 2015 .

[16]  Joachim Milberg,et al.  Electron beam sintering of metal powder , 2008, Prod. Eng..

[17]  O. Harrysson,et al.  Direct metal fabrication of titanium implants with tailored materials and mechanical properties using electron beam melting technology , 2008 .

[18]  Shivakumar Raman,et al.  Mechanical evaluation of porous titanium (Ti6Al4V) structures with electron beam melting (EBM). , 2010, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[19]  Ninggang Shen,et al.  THERMAL MODELING OF ELECTRON BEAM ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING PROCESS - POWDER SINTERING EFFECTS , 2012 .

[20]  Bo Cheng,et al.  Speed Function Effects in Electron Beam Additive Manufacturing , 2014 .

[21]  S. Biamino,et al.  Electron beam melting of Ti–48Al–2Cr–2Nb alloy: Microstructure and mechanical properties investigation , 2011 .

[22]  Boris Wilthan,et al.  Thermophysical Properties of Solid and Liquid Ti-6Al-4V (TA6V) Alloy , 2006 .

[23]  Joakim Karlsson,et al.  Digital image correlation analysis of local strain fields on Ti6Al4V manufactured by electron beam melting , 2014 .

[24]  Michael F. Zäh,et al.  Modelling and simulation of electron beam melting , 2010, Prod. Eng..

[25]  Andrey V. Gusarov,et al.  Mechanisms of selective laser sintering and heat transfer in Ti powder , 2003 .

[26]  David W. Rosen,et al.  Additive Manufacturing Technologies: Rapid Prototyping to Direct Digital Manufacturing , 2009 .

[27]  Ruel A. Overfelt,et al.  Measurement of Specific Heat Capacity and Electrical Resistivity of Industrial Alloys Using Pulse Heating Techniques , 2003 .