Unconsciously learning task-irrelevant perceptual sequences

We demonstrated unconscious learning of task-irrelevant perceptual regularities in a Serial Reaction Time (SRT) task in both visual and auditory domains. Participants were required to respond to different letters ('F' or 'J', experiment 1) or syllables ('can' or 'you', experiment 2) which occurred in random order. Unbeknownst to participants, the color (red, green, blue or yellow) of the two letters or the tone (1-4) of the syllables varied according to certain rules. Reaction times indicated that people indeed learnt both the color and tonal regularities indicating that task-irrelevant sequence structure can be learned perceptually. In a subsequent prediction test of knowledge of the color or tonal cues using subjective measures, we showed that people could acquire task irrelevant knowledge unconsciously.

[1]  W. R. Garner.  Facilitation and interference with a separable redundant dimension in stimulus comparison , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  Daniel B. Willingham,et al.  On the development of procedural knowledge. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[3]  Carol A. Seger,et al.  Independent Judgment-Linked and Motor-Linked Forms of Artificial Grammar Learning , 1998, Consciousness and Cognition.

[4]  Eric Soetens,et al.  Perceptual or motor learning in SRT tasks with complex sequence structures , 2006, Psychological research.

[5]  Zoltan Dienes,et al.  Conscious versus unconscious learning of structure , 2012 .

[6]  Z. Dienes,et al.  Implicit learning of nonlocal musical rules: implicitly learning more than chunks. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[7]  Z. Dienes,et al.  Measuring Learning using an Untrained Control Group: Comment on R. Reber and Perruchet , 2003, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[8]  E. Soetens,et al.  Negative priming in the SRT task: Learning of irrelevant sequences is enhanced by concurrent learning of relevant sequences , 2008 .

[9]  R. Hassin,et al.  Short Article: Goal relevance and artificial grammar learning , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  M. Nissen,et al.  Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[11]  Y. Hochberg.  A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance , 1988 .

[12]  N. Mackintosh,et al.  Psychometric intelligence dissociates implicit and explicit learning. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  Zoltan Dienes,et al.  Conscious and unconscious thought in artificial grammar learning , 2012, Consciousness and Cognition.

[14]  Z. Diénès.  Understanding Psychology as a Science: An Introduction to Scientific and Statistical Inference , 2008 .

[15]  Luis Jiménez,et al.  Which Attention Is Needed for Implicit Sequence Learning , 1999 .

[16]  Karolina Janacsek,et al.  Interference between Sentence Processing and Probabilistic Implicit Sequence Learning , 2011, PloS one.

[17]  G. Remillard.  Pure perceptual-based sequence learning. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[18]  S. Kaufman,et al.  Intact implicit learning in autism spectrum conditions , 2010, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[19]  A. Reber.  Implicit learning and tacit knowledge , 1993 .

[20]  Lei Zhu,et al.  Unconscious structural knowledge of tonal symmetry: Tang poetry redefines limits of implicit learning , 2012, Consciousness and Cognition.

[21]  Esther van den Bos,et al.  Structural selection in implicit learning of artificial grammars , 2009, Psychological research.

[22]  Z. Dienes.  Subjective measures of unconscious knowledge. , 2008, Progress in brain research.

[23]  Zoltan Dienes,et al.  Fluency does not express implicit knowledge of artificial grammars , 2010, Cognition.

[24]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Learning the structure of event sequences. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[25]  John N. Williams,et al.  THE IMPLICIT LEARNING OF MAPPINGS BETWEEN FORMS AND CONTEXTUALLY DERIVED MEANINGS , 2011, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[26]  D. Shanks,et al.  Attention modulates the learning of multiple contingencies , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[27]  U. Mayr,et al.  Spatial attention and implicit sequence learning: evidence for independent learning of spatial and nonspatial sequences. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[28]  Z. Dienes.  Bayesian Versus Orthodox Statistics: Which Side Are You On? , 2011, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[29]  Tim Curran,et al.  Attentional and Nonattentional Forms of Sequence Learning , 1993 .

[30]  Zoltan Dienes,et al.  Rapidly Measuring the Speed of Unconscious Learning: Amnesics Learn Quickly and Happy People Slowly , 2012, PloS one.

[31]  Zoltán Dienes,et al.  How does Prior Knowledge Affect Implicit and Explicit Concept Learning? , 2008, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[32]  Kazuo Shigemasu,et al.  Role of selective attention in artificial grammar learning , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[33]  D. Rosenthal.  Consciousness and mind , 2005 .

[34]  D. Howard,et al.  Serial pattern learning by event observation. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[35]  Z. Dienes,et al.  Measuring unconscious knowledge: distinguishing structural knowledge and judgment knowledge , 2005, Psychological research.

[36]  Zoltán Dienes,et al.  Cross cultural differences in unconscious knowledge , 2012, Cognition.

[37]  Richard I. Ivry,et al.  Attention and structure in sequence learning. , 1990 .

[38]  Alexa R. Romberg,et al.  Statistical learning and language acquisition. , 2010, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[39]  G. Remillard.  Pure perceptual-based learning of second-, third-, and fourth-order sequential probabilities , 2011, Psychological research.

[40]  G. Remillard.  Pure perceptual-based sequence learning: a role for visuospatial attention. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[41]  N. Lavie.  Distracted and confused?: Selective attention under load , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[42]  Zoltan Dienes,et al.  Assumptions of subjective measures of unconscious mental states: higher order thoughts and bias , 2004 .

[43]  D. Chalmers.  Consciousness and Cognition , 1990 .

[44]  Eric Soetens,et al.  Spatial processing and perceptual sequence learning in SRT tasks. , 2006, Experimental psychology.

[45]  A M Burton,et al.  Learning complex sequences: no role for observation? , 2001, Psychological research.

[46]  Ferenc Kemény,et al.  Perceptual Effect on Motor Learning in the Serial Reaction-Time Task , 2011, The Journal of general psychology.

[47]  W. Fias,et al.  Disentangling perceptual from motor implicit sequence learning with a serial color-matching task , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[48]  Lei Zhu,et al.  Unconscious structural knowledge of form–meaning connections , 2011, Consciousness and Cognition.

[49]  Rhiannon N. Turner,et al.  Imagined Intergroup Contact: Theory, Paradigm and Practice , 2009 .

[50]  E. Higgins,et al.  Motivation in Mental Accessibility: Relevance Of A Representation (ROAR) as a New Framework. , 2010, Social and personality psychology compass.

[51]  Z. Dienes,et al.  Can musical transformations be implicitly learned , 2004 .

[52]  Joseph Tzelgov,et al.  Interactions between encoding and retrieval in the domain of sequence-learning. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.