Modeling nanomaterial fate in wastewater treatment: Monte Carlo simulation of silver nanoparticles (nano-Ag).

Wastewater effluent and sewage sludge are predicted to be important release pathways for nanomaterials used in many consumer products. The uncertainty and variability of potential nanomaterial inputs, nanomaterial properties, and the operation of the wastewater treatment plant contribute to the difficulty of predicting sludge and effluent nanomaterial concentration. With a model parsimony approach, we developed a mass-balance representation of engineered nanomaterial (ENM) behavior based on a minimal number of input variables to describe release quantities to the environment. Our simulations show that significant differences in the removal of silver nanoparticles (nano-Ag) can be expected based on the type of engineered coatings used to stabilize these materials in suspension. At current production estimates, 95% of the estimated effluent concentrations of the nano-Ag considered to be least well-removed by the average wastewater treatment plant are calculated to fall below 0.12 μg/L, while 95% of the estimated sludge concentrations of nano-Ag with coatings that increase their likelihood of being present in biosolids, fall below 0.35 μg/L.

[1]  Stella M. Marinakos,et al.  Size-controlled dissolution of organic-coated silver nanoparticles. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  Andrew D Maynard,et al.  Exposure Assessment Approaches for Engineered Nanomaterials , 2010, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[3]  B. Nowack,et al.  Exposure modeling of engineered nanoparticles in the environment. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  K. Hungerbühler,et al.  Estimation of cumulative aquatic exposure and risk due to silver: contribution of nano-functionalized plastics and textiles. , 2008, The Science of the total environment.

[5]  Jungho Hwang,et al.  Susceptibility constants of Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis to silver and copper nanoparticles. , 2007, The Science of the total environment.

[6]  G. Lowry,et al.  Environmental transformations of silver nanoparticles: impact on stability and toxicity. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[7]  W D Shaw,et al.  Short communication: selecting input distributions for use in Monte Carlo simulations. , 1995, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[8]  R. Scholz,et al.  Modeled environmental concentrations of engineered nanomaterials (TiO(2), ZnO, Ag, CNT, Fullerenes) for different regions. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[9]  Mitsuhiro Murayama,et al.  Discovery and characterization of silver sulfide nanoparticles in final sewage sludge products. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  Stella M. Marinakos,et al.  Intracellular uptake and associated toxicity of silver nanoparticles in Caenorhabditis elegans. , 2010, Aquatic toxicology.

[11]  R. Aitken,et al.  Manufacture and use of nanomaterials: current status in the UK and global trends. , 2006, Occupational medicine.

[12]  Bruno Dufour,et al.  Surface Modifications Enhance Nanoiron Transport and NAPL Targeting in Saturated Porous Media , 2007 .

[13]  Michael Riediker,et al.  Use of nanoparticles in Swiss Industry: a targeted survey. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  A. Sarofim,et al.  Rates and Routes of Transport of PCBs in the Environment , 1972, Environmental health perspectives.

[15]  David A. Cornwell,et al.  Introduction to Environmental Engineering , 1991 .

[16]  R W Scholz,et al.  Engineered nanomaterials in rivers--exposure scenarios for Switzerland at high spatial and temporal resolution. , 2011, Environmental pollution.

[17]  M. Granger Morgan,et al.  Mixed Levels of Uncertainty in Complex Policy Models , 1999 .

[18]  George Tchobanoglous,et al.  Wastewater Engineering Treatment Disposal Reuse , 1972 .

[19]  Qasim Chaudhry,et al.  Considerations for environmental fate and ecotoxicity testing to support environmental risk assessments for engineered nanoparticles. , 2009, Journal of chromatography. A.

[20]  Paul Westerhoff,et al.  Nanoparticle silver released into water from commercially available sock fabrics. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[21]  Robert N Grass,et al.  Oxide nanoparticle uptake in human lung fibroblasts: effects of particle size, agglomeration, and diffusion at low concentrations. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[22]  Pratim Biswas,et al.  Assessing the risks of manufactured nanomaterials. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[23]  J. Lead,et al.  Transformations of nanomaterials in the environment. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[24]  Izrail S. Turovskiy,et al.  Wastewater Sludge Processing , 2006 .

[25]  Nigel Horan Suspended growth processes , 2003 .

[26]  Mark R. Wiesner,et al.  Estimating production data for five engineered nanomaterials as a basis for exposure assessment. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[27]  Fadri Gottschalk,et al.  The release of engineered nanomaterials to the environment. , 2011, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.