Generic Earthquake Simulator

Many of the papers in this topical issue concern earthquake simulators and their results. The goals and history of the project leading to this work are described in the preface to this topical issue. Earthquake simulators are computer programs that use physics of stress transfer and frictional resistance to describe earthquake sequences. Some are capable of generating long earthquake histories on many faults. They necessarily adopt a variety of simplifications to make computation feasible. The amount of detail computed within individual earthquakes depends on the simulator. None of those capable of generating long histories includes elastodynamics, but some make approximations of it. Nevertheless, seismic waves are not computed in any of the many‐fault simulators focused on here. The faults are typically approximated by many rectangular elements, although the future use of triangles would allow more accurate representation of curved fault surfaces. This paper briefly describes the features that are common to all of the earthquake simulators discussed in this topical issue of SRL . Following it are four papers (Pollitz, 2012; Richards‐Dinger and Dieterich, 2012; Sachs et al. , 2012; Ward, 2012) authored by each of the groups, which present features of their simulator that go beyond this generic description. Results from using these simulators are not presented in those papers but are contained within a subsequent paper (Tullis et al. , 2012) that compares the results of using these five simulators on an all‐California fault model, allcal2. A detailed description of this fault model can be found at http://scec.usc.edu/research/eqsims/, and the formats used for input and output by our group are described by Barall (2012). ### Fault Geometry and Slip Rates UCERF …

[1]  Fred F. Pollitz,et al.  ViscoSim Earthquake Simulator , 2012 .

[2]  B. E. Shaw,et al.  Slip-Length Scaling in Large Earthquakes: The Role of Deep-Penetrating Slip below the Seismogenic Layer , 2007 .

[3]  James H. Dieterich,et al.  Time‐dependent friction in rocks , 1972 .

[4]  J. C. Savage A dislocation model of strain accumulation and release at a subduction zone , 1983 .

[5]  J. Dieterich,et al.  Direct observation of frictional contacts: New insights for state-dependent properties , 1994 .

[6]  T. Tullis Rock friction constitutive behavior from laboratory experiments and its implications for an earthquake prediction field monitoring program , 1988 .

[7]  James H. Dieterich,et al.  RSQSim Earthquake Simulator , 2012 .

[8]  Terry E. Tullis,et al.  Fault model for preseismic deformation at Parkfield, California , 1995 .

[9]  Louise H. Kellogg,et al.  Virtual California earthquake simulations: simple models and their application to an observed sequence of earthquakes , 2010 .

[10]  Thomas S. Tullis,et al.  Earthquake models using rate and state friction and fast multipoles , 2003 .

[11]  Nadia Lapusta,et al.  Nucleation and early seismic propagation of small and large events in a crustal earthquake model , 2003 .

[12]  B. E. Shaw Magnitude dependence of radiated energy spectra: Far-field expressions of slip pulses in earthquake models: MAGNITUDE DEPENDENCE OF ENERGY SPECTRA , 2003 .

[13]  J. Rice Spatio‐temporal complexity of slip on a fault , 1993 .

[14]  J. Dieterich Time-dependent friction and the mechanics of stick-slip , 1978 .

[15]  A. Ruina Slip instability and state variable friction laws , 1983 .

[16]  Robert W. Robinson,et al.  Collaborative Comparison of Earthquake Simulators , 2008 .

[17]  Yoshihiro Kaneko,et al.  Comparing Earthquake Simulators That Include Rate and State Friction , 2009 .

[18]  Y. Okada Internal deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space , 1992, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[19]  T. Tullis Rock friction and its implications for earthquake prediction examined via models of Parkfield earthquakes. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  J. Dieterich Modeling of rock friction: 1. Experimental results and constitutive equations , 1979 .

[21]  Louise H. Kellogg,et al.  A Comparison among Observations and Earthquake Simulator Results for the allcal2 California Fault Model , 2012 .

[22]  J. Dieterich Constitutive Properties of Faults With Simulated Gouge , 2013 .

[23]  M. A. Chinnery The stress changes that accompany strike-slip faulting , 1963 .

[24]  Louise H. Kellogg,et al.  Virtual California Earthquake Simulator , 2012 .

[25]  Michael Barall,et al.  Data Transfer File Formats for Earthquake Simulators , 2012 .

[26]  J. Rice,et al.  Elastodynamic analysis for slow tectonic loading with spontaneous rupture episodes on faults with rate‐ and state‐dependent friction , 2000 .

[27]  Steven N. Ward,et al.  ALLCAL Earthquake Simulator , 2012 .

[28]  Timothy E. Dawson,et al.  Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast, Version 2 (UCERF 2) , 2009 .

[29]  C. Marone LABORATORY-DERIVED FRICTION LAWS AND THEIR APPLICATION TO SEISMIC FAULTING , 1998 .