Inhibition of adhesion of yeasts and bacteria by poly(ethylene oxide)-brushes on glass in a parallel plate flow chamber.

Poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO)-brushes are generally recognized as protein-repellent surfaces, and although a role in discouraging microbial adhesion has been established for some strains and species, no study exists on the effects of PEO-brushes on a large variety of bacterial and yeast strains. In this paper, a PEO-brush has been covalently attached to glass and silica by reaction in a polymer melt. Subsequently, the presence of a PEO-brush was demonstrated using contact angle measurements, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and ellipsometry. For five bacterial (Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus salivarius, Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) and two yeast strains (Candida albicans and Candida tropicalis), adhesion to PEO-brushes was compared with adhesion to bare glass in a parallel plate flow chamber. The initial deposition rates of Sta. epidermidis, Sta. aureus and Str. salivarius to glass were relatively high, between 2400 and 2600 cm(-2) s(-1), while E. coli and P. aeruginosa deposited much more slowly. The initial deposition rates of the yeasts to glass were 144 and 444 cm(-2) s(-1) for C. albicans GB 1/2 and C. tropicalis GB 9/9, respectively. Coating of the glass surface with a PEO-brush yielded more than 98 % reduction in bacterial adhesion, although for the more hydrophobic P. aeruginosa a smaller reduction was observed. For both yeast species adhesion suppression was less effective than for the bacteria and here too the more hydrophobic C. tropicalis showed less reduction than the more hydrophilic C. albicans. The PEO-brush had a thickness of 22 nm in water, as inferred from ellipsometry. Assuming that on bare glass the adhered micro-organisms are positioned only a few nanometers away from the surface and that the brush keeps them at a distance of 22 nm, it is calculated that the brush yields a sevenfold attenuation of the Lifshitz-Van der Waals attraction to the surface between the micro-organisms and the surface. Decreased Lifshitz-van der Waals attraction may be responsible for the suppression of the microbial adhesion observed.

[1]  Malte Hermansson,et al.  The DLVO theory in microbial adhesion , 1999 .

[2]  H C van der Mei,et al.  Physico-chemistry of initial microbial adhesive interactions--its mechanisms and methods for study. , 1999, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[3]  George M. Whitesides,et al.  Molecular Conformation in Oligo(ethylene glycol)-Terminated Self-Assembled Monolayers on Gold and Silver Surfaces Determines Their Ability To Resist Protein Adsorption , 1998 .

[4]  B. Kasemo,et al.  Biomaterial and implant surfaces: on the role of cleanliness, contamination, and preparation procedures. , 1988, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[5]  H. Suh,et al.  Bacterial adhesion on PEG modified polyurethane surfaces. , 1998, Biomaterials.

[6]  W. Norde,et al.  Tethered polymer chains: surface chemistry and their impact on colloidal and surface properties. , 2003, Advances in colloid and interface science.

[7]  J. M. Harris,et al.  Poly(Ethylene Glycol) Chemistry , 1992 .

[8]  D. Roy,et al.  Characterization of physicochemical forces involved in adhesion of Listeria monocytogenes to surfaces , 1991, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[9]  H. C. van der Mei,et al.  Adhesion to silicone rubber of yeasts and bacteria isolated from voice prostheses: influence of salivary conditioning films. , 1997, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[10]  J R Smith,et al.  Preventing bacterial adhesion onto surfaces: the low-surface-energy approach. , 1999, Biomaterials.

[11]  A. Gristina.  Biomaterial-centered infection: microbial adhesion versus tissue integration. 1987. , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  T. P. Davis,et al.  A hydrophobic interaction site for lysozyme binding to polyethylene glycol and model contact lens polymers. , 1998, Biomaterials.

[13]  Joseph D. Andrade,et al.  Protein—surface interactions in the presence of polyethylene oxide , 1991 .

[14]  Rolf Bos,et al.  A reference guide to microbial cell surface hydrophobicity based on contact angles , 1998 .

[15]  P. E. Laibinis,et al.  Protein-resistant coatings for glass and metal oxide surfaces derived from oligo(ethylene glycol)-terminated alkytrichlorosilanes. , 1998, Biomaterials.

[16]  E. Sudhölter,et al.  Preparation of polystyrene brushes by reaction of terminal vinyl groups on silicon and silica surfaces , 2003 .

[17]  M. Davies,et al.  Control of staphylococcal adhesion to polystyrene surfaces by polymer surface modification with surfactants. , 1992, Biomaterials.

[18]  Martin P. Seah,et al.  Simple method of depth profiling (stratifying) contamination layers, illustrated by studies on stainless steel , 1994 .

[19]  M Morra,et al.  On the molecular basis of fouling resistance , 2000, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[20]  J. Hubbell,et al.  Force Measurements between Bacteria and Poly(ethylene glycol)-Coated Surfaces , 2000 .

[21]  H. C. van der Mei,et al.  Models for studying initial adhesion and surface growth in biofilm formation on surfaces. , 1999, Methods in enzymology.

[22]  D. Leckband,et al.  Interactions of Poly(ethylene oxide) Brushes with Chemically Selective Surfaces , 2000 .

[23]  H. C. van der Mei,et al.  Analysis of Bacterial Detachment from Substratum Surfaces by the Passage of Air-Liquid Interfaces , 2001, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[24]  D. Leckband,et al.  Protein-Induced Changes in Poly(ethylene glycol) Brushes: Molecular Weight and Temperature Dependence , 2001 .

[25]  H. Busscher,et al.  Specific and non-specific interactions in bacterial adhesion to solid substrata , 1987 .

[26]  Edward J. Bouwer,et al.  Reversibility and mechanism of bacterial adhesion , 1995 .

[27]  G. J. Verkerke,et al.  In vitro and in vivo microbial adhesion and growth on argon plasma-treated silicone rubber voice prostheses , 1998, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[28]  G. López,et al.  Attachment of bacteria to model solid surfaces: oligo(ethylene glycol) surfaces inhibit bacterial attachment. , 1996, FEMS microbiology letters.

[29]  H. C. van der Mei,et al.  Use of flow chamber devices and image analysis methods to study microbial adhesion. , 1995, Methods in enzymology.

[30]  Joseph D. Andrade,et al.  The Contact Angle and Interface Energetics , 1985 .

[31]  A. Gristina,et al.  Biomaterial-centered infection: microbial adhesion versus tissue integration. , 1987, Science.

[32]  A. Halperin,et al.  Polymer Brushes that Resist Adsorption of Model Proteins: Design Parameters , 1999 .

[33]  J. Feijen,et al.  Antimicrobial effects of positively charged surfaces on adhering Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. , 2001, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.