Attention to Multiple Cues During Spontaneous Object Labeling.

It is well established that 2-year-olds attribute a novel label to an object's global shape rather than local features (i.e., parts). Although recent studies have found that younger infants also attend to global rather than local features when given a label, the test stimuli in these experiments confounded parts and shape by varying both or neither. With infants (16- and 24-month-olds) and adults, this experiment disentangled shape and parts with appropriate test objects. Results showed a clear development of a strategy incorporating multiple cues. Across three age groups, there was an increase in generalizing labels to objects matching the exemplar's local and global features (parts, base, and shape), and a decrease to objects matching in only one local feature. We discuss these results in terms of a learned flexibility in using multiple cues to predict lexical categories.

[1]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Early noun vocabularies: do ontology, category structure and syntax correspond? , 1999, Cognition.

[2]  Mutsumi Imai,et al.  Children's Theories of Word Meaning: The Role of Shape Similarity in Early Acquisition , 1994 .

[3]  The development of modeling or the modeling of development? , 2008, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[4]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Shape and the first hundred nouns. , 2004, Child development.

[5]  L. Cohen,et al.  Infants’ Use of Functional Parts in Basic-like Categorization , 1999 .

[6]  S. Waxman,et al.  Early word-learning entails reference, not merely associations , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[7]  G. Butterworth,et al.  Infants' use of object parts in early categorization. , 1998, Developmental psychology.

[8]  Megan M. Saylor,et al.  Different kinds of information affect word learning in the preschool years: the case of part-term learning. , 2004, Child development.

[9]  Harumi Kobayashi,et al.  How 2-year-old children learn novel part names of unfamiliar objects , 1998, Cognition.

[10]  Kathy Hirsh-Pasek,et al.  The birth of words: ten-month-olds learn words through perceptual salience. , 2006, Child development.

[11]  L. Cohen,et al.  Labels can override perceptual categories in early infancy , 2008, Cognition.

[12]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Object name Learning Provides On-the-Job Training for Attention , 2002, Psychological science.

[13]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  Sensitivity to Sampling in Bayesian Word Learning We Thank Members of the Ubc Baby Cognition Lab for Their Help with Data Collection, And , 2022 .

[14]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Developmental changes in visual object recognition between 18 and 24 months of age. , 2009, Developmental science.

[15]  Linda B Smith,et al.  They call it like they see it: spontaneous naming and attention to shape. , 2005, Developmental science.

[16]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Infants rapidly learn word-referent mappings via cross-situational statistics , 2008, Cognition.

[17]  K. Plunkett,et al.  The use of social and salience cues in early word learning. , 2006, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[18]  Rebecca J. Brand,et al.  Breaking the language barrier: an emergentist coalition model for the origins of word learning. , 2000, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[19]  Kathy Hirsh-Pasek,et al.  II. The Emergentist Coalition Model , 2000 .

[20]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  ' s personal copy Simplicity and generalization : Short-cutting abstraction in children ’ s object categorizations , 1997 .

[21]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  The importance of shape in early lexical learning , 1988 .

[22]  K. Hirsh-Pasek,et al.  Young children associate novel words with complex objects rather than salient parts. , 2007, Developmental psychology.

[23]  Linda B. Smith Learning to Recognize Objects Author ( s ) : , 2008 .

[24]  G. Butterworth,et al.  Infants' attention to object structure in early categorization. , 1998, Developmental psychology.

[25]  Larissa K. Samuelson,et al.  Dynamic Noun Generalization: Moment-to-Moment Interactions Shape Children's Naming Biases. , 2007 .

[26]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Perceptual Features and the Development of Conceptual Knowledge , 2006 .

[27]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  Parts, Partonomies, and Taxonomies. , 1989 .

[28]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Syntactic context and the shape bias in children's and adults' lexical learning , 1992 .

[29]  E. Markman,et al.  Children's use of mutual exclusivity to constrain the meanings of words , 1988, Cognitive Psychology.

[30]  Jessica S. Horst,et al.  The role of competition in word learning via referent selection. , 2010, Developmental science.

[31]  Larissa K. Samuelson,et al.  Statistical regularities in vocabulary guide language acquisition in connectionist models and 15-20-month-olds. , 2002, Developmental psychology.

[32]  Linda B. Smith Learning to Recognize Objects , 2003, Psychological science.

[33]  Linda B Smith,et al.  Known and novel noun extensions: attention at two levels of abstraction. , 2003, Child development.

[34]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Naming in young children: a dumb attentional mechanism? , 1996, Cognition.

[35]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  An attentional learning account of the shape bias: reply to Cimpian and Markman (2005) and Booth, Waxman, and Huang (2005). , 2006, Developmental psychology.