Energy efficiency – How far can we raise the bar? Revealing the potential of best available technologies

This paper presents the first attempt to quantify the potential impacts of a massive deployment of state-of-the-art energy-efficient technologies in the most energy-consuming economies in the world: the United States, the European Union, China, and India. We first identified the most efficient technologies that are currently available for a wide range of end uses in the residential and industrial sectors. The technologies we selected are either engineered with the best available existing components or are the most promising emerging technologies believed to be producible on a large scale in the near future. Using a bottom-up energy model developed at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, we modeled the most aggressive foreseeable policy that would result in making the best available technologies mandatory by 2015. We estimate that adoption of the best available technologies would avoid 2600 TWh, or about 20% of the projected energy consumption and 1.5 Gt of carbon dioxide emissions by 2030. We believe that this study, which brings engineering knowledge of technologies together with a rigorous energy model, is the most reliable analysis to date of the maximum potential of energy efficiency.

[1]  Virginie E. Letschert,et al.  Bottom–Up Energy Analysis System (BUENAS)—an international appliance efficiency policy tool , 2013 .

[2]  Kenichi Wada,et al.  Energy efficiency opportunities in the residential sector and their feasibility , 2012 .

[3]  Nakul Sathaye,et al.  Potential Global Benefits of Improved Ceiling Fan Energy Efficiency , 2014 .

[4]  Barbara Schlomann,et al.  Characterization of the household electricity consumption in the EU, potential energy savings and sp , 2011 .

[5]  James E. McMahon,et al.  Potential Benefits from Improved Energy Efficiency of Key Electrical Products: The Case of India , 2005 .

[6]  James E. McMahon,et al.  Business Case for Energy Efficiency in Support of Climate Change Mitigation, Economic and Societal Benefits in China , 2012 .

[7]  Karina Garbesi,et al.  Max Tech and Beyond: Maximizing Appliance and Equipment Efficiency by Design , 2012 .

[8]  James E. McMahon,et al.  Business Case for Energy Efficiency in Support of Climate Change Mitigation, Economic and Societal Benefits in the United States , 2011 .

[9]  Paul Waide,et al.  Evaluating the impact of appliance efficiency labeling programs and standards: process, impact, and market transformation evaluations , 2001 .

[10]  D. Greene,et al.  Energy efficiency and consumption — the rebound effect — a survey , 2000 .

[11]  Tim Jackson,et al.  Missing carbon reductions? Exploring rebound and backfire effects in UK households , 2010, Energy Policy.

[12]  James E. McMahon,et al.  Impacts of US federal energy efficiency standards for residential appliances , 2003 .

[13]  Nihar Shah,et al.  TV Energy Consumption Trends and Energy-Efficiency Improvement Options , 2011 .

[14]  Nan Zhou,et al.  Analysis of potential energy saving and CO2 emission reduction of home appliances and commercial equipments in China , 2011 .

[15]  Alison Williams,et al.  Energy and Economic Impacts of U.S. Federal Energy and Water Conservation Standards Adopted From 1987 Through 2010 , 2013 .

[16]  Nils F. Nissen,et al.  EuP Preparatory Study Lot 6 Standby and Off-mode Losses , 2007 .

[17]  James E. McMahon,et al.  Energy-efficiency labels and standards: A guidebook for appliances, equipment and lighting , 2001 .

[18]  Stephane de la Rue du Can,et al.  Global Potential of Energy Efficiency Standards and Labeling Programs , 2008 .

[19]  S. Sorrell The rebound effect: an assessment of the evidence for economy-wide energy savings from improved energy efficiency , 2007 .