The diagnostic role of “acceleration time” measurement in patients with classical low flow low gradient aortic stenosis with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction

[1]  B. Prendergast,et al.  2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. , 2021, European heart journal.

[2]  Dave L Dixon,et al.  2020 ACC/AHA guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. , 2021, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[3]  J. Chambers,et al.  Higher Acceleration/Ejection Time Ratio Predicts Impaired Outcome in Aortic Valve Stenosis. , 2021, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[4]  M. Mack,et al.  2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. , 2020, Circulation.

[5]  T. Kitai,et al.  Assessing the true severity of low-gradient aortic stenosis using resting echocardiography. , 2020, Journal of cardiology.

[6]  C. Tribouilloy,et al.  Correlates of the ratio of acceleration time to ejection time in patients with aortic stenosis: An echocardiographic and computed tomography study. , 2019, Archives of cardiovascular diseases.

[7]  H. Baumgartner,et al.  Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography for Management of Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis. , 2018, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  Sergio Gamaza-Chulián,et al.  Acceleration Time and Ratio of Acceleration Time to Ejection Time in Aortic Stenosis: New Echocardiographic Diagnostic Parameters , 2017, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[9]  J. Chambers,et al.  Recommendations on the Echocardiographic Assessment of Aortic Valve Stenosis: A Focused Update from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography. , 2017, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[10]  P. Pibarot,et al.  Low-gradient aortic stenosis. , 2016, European heart journal.

[11]  P. Pibarot,et al.  Impact of classic and paradoxical low flow on survival after aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  M. Enriquez-Sarano,et al.  Impact of aortic valve calcification, as measured by MDCT, on survival in patients with aortic stenosis: results of an international registry study. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  P. Pibarot,et al.  The complex nature of discordant severe calcified aortic valve disease grading: new insights from combined Doppler echocardiographic and computed tomographic study. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  Jennifer Taylor,et al.  ESC/EACTS Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease. , 2012, European heart journal.

[15]  W. Zoghbi,et al.  Flow acceleration time and ratio of acceleration time to ejection time for prosthetic aortic valve function. , 2011, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[16]  M. Enriquez-Sarano,et al.  Measurement of aortic valve calcification using multislice computed tomography: correlation with haemodynamic severity of aortic stenosis and clinical implication for patients with low ejection fraction , 2010, Heart.

[17]  H. Baumgartner,et al.  Validation of conventional and simplified methods to calculate projected valve area at normal flow rate in patients with low flow, low gradient aortic stenosis: the multicenter TOPAS (True or Pseudo Severe Aortic Stenosis) study. , 2010, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[18]  B. Carabello,et al.  Paradoxical low flow and/or low gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: implications for diagnosis and treatment , 2009, European heart journal.

[19]  C. Tribouilloy,et al.  Outcome after aortic valve replacement for low-flow/low-gradient aortic stenosis without contractile reserve on dobutamine stress echocardiography. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  P. Pibarot,et al.  Paradoxical Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis Despite Preserved Ejection Fraction Is Associated With Higher Afterload and Reduced Survival , 2007, Circulation.

[21]  C. Tribouilloy,et al.  Influence of Preoperative Left Ventricular Contractile Reserve on Postoperative Ejection Fraction in Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis , 2006, Circulation.

[22]  H. Baumgartner,et al.  Projected Valve Area at Normal Flow Rate Improves the Assessment of Stenosis Severity in Patients With Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: The Multicenter TOPAS (Truly or Pseudo-Severe Aortic Stenosis) Study , 2006, Circulation.

[23]  C. Tribouilloy,et al.  Low‐Gradient Aortic Stenosis Operative Risk Stratification and Predictors for Long‐Term Outcome: A Multicenter Study Using Dobutamine Stress Hemodynamics , 2003, Circulation.

[24]  Philippe Ravaud,et al.  A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe: The Euro Heart Survey on Valvular Heart Disease. , 2003, European heart journal.

[25]  C. Yancy,et al.  Usefulness of dobutamine echocardiography in distinguishing severe from nonsevere valvular aortic stenosis in patients with depressed left ventricular function and low transvalvular gradients. , 1995, The American journal of cardiology.

[26]  R. Rothbart,et al.  Determination of aortic valve area by two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography in patients with normal and stenotic bioprosthetic valves. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[27]  J B Seward,et al.  Continuous wave Doppler echocardiographic measurement of prosthetic valve gradients. A simultaneous Doppler-catheter correlative study. , 1989, Circulation.

[28]  H. Kuhn,et al.  [The applicability of systolic time intervals in patients before and after aortic valve replacement (author's transl)]. , 1979, Zeitschrift fur Kardiologie.

[29]  A. Parisi,et al.  Systolic Time Intervals in Severe Aortic Valve Disease: Changes with Surgery and Hemodynamic Correlations , 1971, Circulation.