Binocular disparity can augment the capacity of vision without affecting subjective experience of depth

Binocular disparity results in a tangible subjective experience of three-dimensional world, but whether disparity also augments objective perceptual performance remains debated. We hypothesized that the improved coding of depth enabled by binocular disparity allows participants to individuate more objects at a glance as the objects can be more efficiently differentiated from each other and the background. We asked participants to enumerate objects in briefly presented naturalistic (Experiment 1) and artificial (Experiment 2) scenes in immersive virtual reality. This type of enumeration task yields well-documented capacity limits where up to 3–4 items can be enumerated rapidly and accurately, known as subitizing. Our results show that although binocular disparity did not yield a large general improvement in enumeration accuracy or reaction times, it improved participants’ ability to process the items right after the limit of perceptual capacity. Binocular disparity also sped-up response times by 27 ms on average when artificial stimuli (cubes) were used. Interestingly, the influence of disparity on subjectively experienced depth revealed a clearly different pattern than the influence of disparity on objective performance. This suggests that the functional and subjective sides of stereopsis can be dissociated. Altogether our results suggest that binocular disparity may increase the number of items the visual system can simultaneously process. This may help animals to better resolve and track objects in complex, cluttered visual environments.

[1]  Julie M. Harris,et al.  Is stereopsis effective in breaking camouflage for moving targets? , 1997, Vision Research.

[2]  D. Alais,et al.  Orientation tuning of contrast masking caused by motion streaks. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[3]  Matteo Valsecchi,et al.  The role of binocular disparity in rapid scene and pattern recognition , 2013, i-Perception.

[4]  F. A. Miles,et al.  Vergence eye movements in response to binocular disparity without depth perception , 1997, Nature.

[5]  G. Westheimer The Ferrier Lecture, 1992. Seeing depth with two eyes: stereopsis , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  E. Birch,et al.  The functional significance of stereopsis. , 2010, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[7]  Christopher P. Heesy,et al.  Seeing in stereo: The ecology and evolution of primate binocular vision and stereopsis , 2009 .

[8]  Axel Cleeremans,et al.  Measuring consciousness: Is one measure better than the other? , 2010, Consciousness and Cognition.

[9]  J. B.,et al.  The Power of Numerical Discrimination , 1871, Nature.

[10]  Henri Pesonen,et al.  Rapid and accurate processing of multiple objects in briefly presented scenes. , 2016, Journal of vision.

[11]  M. Cartmill Rethinking primate origins. , 1974, Science.

[12]  D. Burr,et al.  Compressive mapping of number to space reflects dynamic encoding mechanisms, not static logarithmic transform , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Vivek Nityananda,et al.  Stereopsis in animals: evolution, function and mechanisms , 2017, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[14]  G. DeAngelis Seeing in three dimensions: the neurophysiology of stereopsis , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[15]  Callum F. Ross,et al.  The Role of Vision in the Origin and Evolution of Primates , 2007 .

[16]  J. Cunningham Evolution of Man , 1950, Nature.

[17]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Flexible cognitive resources: competitive content maps for attention and memory , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[18]  M. Moseley,et al.  Does stereopsis matter in humans? , 1996, Eye.

[19]  K Nakayama,et al.  Visual attention to surfaces in three-dimensional space. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  S. McKee,et al.  The precision of binocular and monocular depth judgments in natural settings. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[21]  D. Bates,et al.  Linear Mixed-Effects Models using 'Eigen' and S4 , 2015 .

[22]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions , 1986, Nature.

[23]  Wijnand A. IJsselsteijn,et al.  Perceived quality of compressed stereoscopic images: Effects of symmetric and asymmetric JPEG coding and camera separation , 2006, TAP.

[24]  T. Jaeger,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.

[25]  Daphne Bavelier,et al.  Altering the rate of visual search through experience: The case of action video game players , 2010 .

[26]  Paul K Saint-Amour Modernist Reconnaissance , 2003 .

[27]  G C DeAngelis,et al.  The physiology of stereopsis. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[28]  M. Morgan,et al.  Grasping deficits and adaptations in adults with stereo vision losses. , 2009, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[29]  Young Lim Lee,et al.  Stereo improves 3D shape discrimination even when rich monocular shape cues are available. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[30]  D. A. Quarles,et al.  Progress and problems , 1953, Electrical Engineering.

[31]  D. Whitney,et al.  Serial dependence in visual perception , 2011 .

[32]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[33]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[34]  George A. Alvarez,et al.  Limits on perceptual encoding can be predicted from known receptive field properties of human visual cortex. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  B. G. Cumming,et al.  Responses of primary visual cortical neurons to binocular disparity without depth perception , 1997, Nature.

[36]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. , 1994, Psychological review.

[37]  Henry Railo,et al.  The role of attention in subitizing , 2008, Cognition.

[38]  Wijnand A. IJsselsteijn,et al.  Evaluation of Stereoscopic Images: Beyond 2D Quality , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[39]  Robert W. Sussman,et al.  Primate origins and the evolution of angiosperms , 1991, American journal of primatology.

[40]  Benjamin T. Backus,et al.  Stereoscopic Offset Makes Objects Easier to Recognize , 2015, PloS one.

[41]  Dhanraj Vishwanath,et al.  Toward a new theory of stereopsis. , 2014, Psychological review.

[42]  Leanne T. Nash Creatures of the dark. The nocturnal prosimians , 2007, International Journal of Primatology.

[43]  Axel Cleeremans,et al.  Measuring consciousness: relating behavioural and neurophysiological approaches , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[44]  S. Edelman,et al.  Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of three-dimensional objects , 1992, Vision Research.

[45]  M. Cartmill,et al.  New views on primate origins , 2005 .

[46]  Robert A. Barton,et al.  Binocularity and brain evolution in primates , 2004 .

[47]  C. S. Green,et al.  Action video game modifies visual selective attention , 2003, Nature.

[48]  C. S. Green,et al.  Enumeration versus multiple object tracking: the case of action video game players , 2006, Cognition.

[49]  J. Pokorny Foundations of Cyclopean Perception , 1972 .

[50]  P. Raven,et al.  Rethinking Primate Origins Again , 2013, American journal of primatology.

[51]  S. Washburn The evolution of man. , 1978, Scientific American.

[52]  C. Koch,et al.  Neural correlates of consciousness: progress and problems , 2016, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[53]  Dhanraj Vishwanath,et al.  Seeing in 3-D With Just One Eye , 2013, Psychology Science.

[54]  D. Melcher,et al.  Subitizing reflects visuo-spatial object individuation capacity , 2011, Cognition.

[55]  David Alais,et al.  Breaking camouflage: binocular disparity reduces contrast masking in natural images. , 2010, Journal of vision.