[Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction].

PURPOSE We performed laparoscopic pyeloplasty in 11 patients with ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction and evaluated the clinical outcomes of this surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between August 2001 and February 2004, 11 patients with UPJ obstruction underwent laparoscopic pyeloplasty in our institute. In all patients, symptoms were presented and UPJ obstruction was confirmed by radiographic examinations. Ten patients had primary obstruction, while one patient had secondary obstruction. Retroperitoneal approach was applied in all but one patient who needed intraperitoneal approach due to secondary obstruction. We performed Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty, Hellström technique and Fenger plasty in 8, 2 and 1 patient, respectively. Nephropexy was performed in 2 patients with nephroptosis, and isthmusectomy was performed in 1 patient with horseshoe kidney, simultaneously. RESULTS The mean operative time was 312 minutes (210-371) and the mean blood loss (including urine) was 75 ml. No blood transfusion was required, and all procedures were performed safely. Crossing vessels were found in 5 patients (45%). Pyelonephritis was the only postoperative complication, managed by the administration of antibiotics. Symptoms were disappeared without recurrences in all patients at mean follow up time of 18 months (6-36). ( CONCLUSION Although the number of cases was small with relatively short follow up period, the clinical outcomes of laparoscopic pyeloplasty in our institute were almost satisfied, as previously reported by other investigators. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty might be one of the standard treatments for patients with UPJ obstruction, although we should carefully consider about indication, approach and operation method.

[1]  L. Kavoussi,et al.  Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: current status , 2005, BJU international.

[2]  T. Gasser,et al.  Retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. , 2004, Journal of endourology.

[3]  A. Kapoor,et al.  McMaster experience with laparoscopic pyeloplasty. , 2004, The Canadian journal of urology.

[4]  M. Meng,et al.  Hellström technique revisited: laparoscopic management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. , 2003, Urology.

[5]  R. Clayman,et al.  Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction. , 2003, The Journal of urology.

[6]  S. Loening,et al.  Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty--the method of choice in the presence of an enlarged renal pelvis and crossing vessels. , 2002, European urology.

[7]  C. Eden,et al.  Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: 50 consecutive cases , 2001, BJU international.

[8]  G. Bartsch,et al.  Laparoscopic Fenger plasty. , 2000, Journal of endourology.

[9]  N. Kekre,et al.  Is open pyeloplasty still justified? , 1997, British journal of urology.

[10]  L. Kavoussi,et al.  Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: experience with the initial 30 cases. , 1997, The Journal of urology.

[11]  R. Clayman,et al.  Acucise endopyelotomy: assessment of long-term durability. , 1996, The Journal of urology.

[12]  G. Bartsch,et al.  Laparoscopic and retroperitoneoscopic repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. , 1996, Urology.

[13]  L. Kavoussi,et al.  Comparison of open and endourologic approaches to the obstructed ureteropelvic junction. , 1995, Urology.

[14]  G. Preminger,et al.  Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. , 1993, The Journal of urology.

[15]  G. Badlani,et al.  Results of 212 consecutive endopyelotomies: an 8-year followup. , 1993, The Journal of urology.

[16]  J. C. Anderson,et al.  RETROCAVAL URETER:A Case diagnosed pre‐operatively and treated successfully by a Plastic Operation , 1949 .

[17]  C. Fenger OPERATION FOR THE RELIEF OF VALVEFORMATION AND STRICTURE OF THE URETER IN HYDROOR PYONEPHROSIS. , 1894 .