Selection and Characterization of Geological Sites able to Host a Pilot-Scale CO2 Storage in the Paris Basin (GéoCarbone-PICOREF)

The objective of the GeoCarbone-PICOREF project was to select and characterize geological sites where CO2 storage in permeable reservoir could be tested at the pilot scale. Both options of storage in deep saline aquifer and in depleted hydrocarbon field were considered. The typical size envisioned for the pilot was 100 kt CO2 per year. GeoCarbone-PICOREF initially focused on a “Regional Domain”, ca. 200 × 150 km, in the Paris Basin. It was attractive for the following reasons: detailed geological data is available, due to 50 years of petroleum exploration; basin-scale deep saline aquifers are present, with a preliminary estimate of storage capacity which is at the Gt CO2 level, namely the carbonate Oolithe Blanche Formation, of Middle Jurassic age, generally located between 1500 and 1800 m depths in the studied area, and several sandstone formations of Triassic age, located between 2000 and 3000 m; several depleted oil fields exist: although offering storage capacities at a much lower level, they do represent very well constrained geological environments, with proven sealing properties; several sources of pure CO2 were identified in the area, at a flow rate compatible with the pilot size, that would avoid capture costs. 750 km of seismic lines were reprocessed and organized in six sections fitted on well logs. This first dataset provided improved representations of: the gross features of the considered aquifers in the Regional Domain; the structural scheme; lateral continuity of the sealing cap rocks. An inventory of the environmental characteristics was also made, including human occupancy, protected areas, water resource, natural hazards, potential conflicts of use with other resources of the subsurface, etc. From all these criteria, a more restricted geographical domain named the “Sector”, ca. 70 × 70 km, was chosen, the most appropriate for further selection of storage site(s). The geological characterization of the Sector has been as exhaustive as possible, with the reprocessing of additional 450 km of seismic lines, and the collection of a complete well-data base (146 petroleum wells). At this scale a relatively detailed characterization of the sedimentary layers could be done, in particular the formations potentially rich in aquifer units. For the Middle Jurassic carbonates observations were made on analogue sediments outcropping 150 km to the east of the Sector. A geological and numerical 3-D representation of the whole sedimentary pile of the Sector area was built. It forms a basis for constructing grids used by codes able to simulate various processes induced by CO2 injection (displacement of the fluids, pressure build-up and release, mechanical deformation, mineral interactions, control of the parameters used to check the local sealing efficiency, etc.). In parallel with that work on aquifers, GeoCarbone-PICOREF has access to all the petroleum data, including production data and reservoir modelling, of the Saint-Martin de Bossenay oil field, localized in the eastern part of the Sector. This was an opportunity to apply a comparable methodology and to test the capabilities of modelling codes to the specific case of a depleted hydrocarbon field, and to show some of the advantages of such a context with respect to a pilot-scale CO2 injection.

[1]  Karsten Pruess,et al.  Coupled modeling of non-isothermal multiphase flow, solutetransport and reactive chemistry in porous and fractured media: 1. ModelDevelopment and Validation , 1998 .

[2]  Sally M. Benson,et al.  Geologic storage of carbon dioxide as a climate change mitigation strategy: performance requirements and the implications of surface seepage , 2005 .

[3]  Stefan Bachu,et al.  Legal and regulatory challenges in the implementation of CO2 geological storage: An Alberta and Canadian perspective , 2008 .

[4]  Karsten Pruess,et al.  TOUGHREACT User's Guide: A Simulation Program for Non-isothermal Multiphase Reactive geochemical Transport in Variable Saturated Geologic Media , 2004 .

[5]  Jean-Pierre Garcia,et al.  Controle stratigraphique des facies, geometries et profils de depot de la plate-forme carbonatee bourguignonne au Bathonien-Callovien , 1996 .

[6]  Patrick Egermann,et al.  An Experimental Investigation of Reaction-Transport Phenomena During Co2 Injection , 2005 .

[7]  F. H. Cornet,et al.  Stress field determinations in France by hydraulic tests in boreholes , 1992 .

[8]  Y. M. Le Nindre,et al.  Evaluating sealing efficiency of caprocks for CO2 storage: an overview of the Geocarbone Integrity program and results , 2010 .

[9]  Y. Le Gallo,et al.  A Sequential Splitting Strategy for CO2 Storage Modelling , 2006 .

[10]  J. Nauroy,et al.  3D geomechanical modelling for CO2 geologic storage in the Dogger carbonates of the Paris Basin , 2009 .

[11]  Elisabeth Gundersen,et al.  Numerical Modeling of the Effect of Carbon Dioxide Sequestration on the Rate of Pressure Solution Creep in Limestone: Preliminary Results , 2005 .

[12]  Rick Chalaturnyk,et al.  IEA GHG Weyburn CO2 monitoring and storage project , 2005 .

[13]  C. Noiriel,et al.  CO2 geological storage: Integrating geochemical, hydrodynamical, mechanical and biological processes from the pore to the reservoir scale , 2009 .

[14]  P C Lichtner,et al.  High resolution numerical investigation on the effect of convective instability on long term CO2 storage in saline aquifers , 2007 .

[15]  E. Bemer,et al.  Geomechanical Log Deduced from Porosity and Mineralogical Content , 2004 .

[16]  B. Smart,et al.  Combining Sequence Stratigraphy, Geostatistical Simulations, and Production Data for Modeling a Fluvial Reservoir in the Chaunoy Field (Triassic, France) , 1998 .

[17]  O. Vizika,et al.  An Integrated Approach to Assess the Petrophysical Properties of Rocks Altered by Rock-Fluid Interactions (CO2 Injection) , 2010 .

[18]  Hubert Fabriol,et al.  The Géocarbone-Monitoring Project: Main Results and Recommendations for Monitoring Deep Geological CO2 Storage in the Paris Basin , 2010 .

[19]  B. Smart,et al.  Management of Chaunoy Oil Field Multilayered Reservoir , 1994 .

[20]  Christopher Juhlin,et al.  Baseline characterization of the CO2SINK geological storage site at Ketzin, Germany , 2006 .

[21]  Paul Marschall,et al.  Characterisation of Gas Transport Properties of the Opalinus Clay, a Potential Host Rock Formation for Radioactive Waste Disposal , 2005 .

[22]  Ricardo Gaviria Garcia Reservoir simulation of co2 sequestration and enhanced oil recovery in Tensleep Formation, Teapot Dome field , 2006 .

[23]  Andy Chadwick,et al.  Best practice for the storage of CO2 in saline aquifers - observations and guidelines from the SACS and CO2STORE projects , 2008 .

[24]  E. Brosse,et al.  Petrophysical Properties of the Middle Jurassic Carbonates in the PICOREF Sector (South Champagne, Paris Basin, France) , 2010 .

[25]  François Renard,et al.  Enhanced deformation of limestone and sandstone in the presence of high pCO2 fluids , 2007 .

[26]  K. Srinivasamoorthy,et al.  Integrated geophysical and chemical study in the lower subbasin of Gadilam River, Tamilnadu, India , 2008 .

[27]  Numerical modeling of carbon dioxide sequestration on the rate of pressure solution creep in limestone: Preliminary results , 2008, 0801.0543.