Comparison of Cloud Cover from All-Sky Imager and Meteorological Observer

AbstractNaked-eye observation of cloud cover has widely resisted automation. Replacement of human observation by instruments is an inexorable trend for the development of ground-based macroscopic cloud observation. In this paper, cloud covers from an all-sky imager (ASI) are compared with those from a meteorological observer (MO) through field experiments performed at three sites in China. The correlation coefficient between ASI and MO is 0.77 for all cases. The ASI cloud fractions have great agreement with MO for clear sky, overcast sky, and sky loaded with low- and middle-level clouds. About 78% of the ASI cases had deviations between ±1 tenth compared to MO cloud cover. High-level cloud (or aerosol) is the main reason causing this difference. It is partially due to MO, who takes aerosol as high, thin cloud. Another reason might be that ASI made a wrong estimation for high-level cloud (or aerosol) because of its detector and the cloud-determination algorithm. Distinguishing high, thin cloud from aerosol...

[1]  E. Barrett,et al.  Relations Between Frequency Distributions of Cloud Over the United Kingdom Based on Conventional Observations and Imagery from Landsat 2 , 1979 .

[2]  William B. Rossow,et al.  Comparison of ISCCP and Other Cloud Amounts , 1993 .

[3]  Mark A. Miller,et al.  An Evaluation of a 94-GHz Radar for Remote Sensing of Cloud Properties , 1995 .

[4]  Evgueni I. Kassianov,et al.  Cloud Sky Cover versus Cloud Fraction: Whole-Sky Simulations and Observations , 2005 .

[5]  Charles N. Long,et al.  Estimating fractional sky cover from spectral measurements , 2008 .

[6]  A. Henderson‐sellers,et al.  Almost a Century of “Imaging” Clouds Over the Whole-Sky Dome , 1989 .

[7]  J. Huo,et al.  Preliminary retrieval of aerosol optical depth from all-sky images , 2010 .

[8]  Rolf Philipona,et al.  Automatic cloud amount detection by surface longwave downward radiation measurements , 2004 .

[9]  Yasuhiro Murayama,et al.  Evening co‐rotating patches: A new type of aurora observed by high sensitivity all‐sky cameras in Alaska , 2003 .

[10]  Juan Huo,et al.  Cloud Determination of All-Sky Images under Low-Visibility Conditions , 2009 .

[11]  David D. Turner,et al.  Full-Time, Eye-Safe Cloud and Aerosol Lidar Observation at Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program Sites: Instruments and Data Analysis , 2013 .

[12]  Wenxing Zhang,et al.  A Feasibility Study of Cloud Base Height Remote Sensing by Simulating Ground-Based Thermal Infrared Brightness Temperature Measurements , 2007 .

[13]  A. Heinle,et al.  Automatic cloud classification of whole sky images , 2010 .

[14]  Josep Calbó,et al.  Retrieving Cloud Characteristics from Ground-Based Daytime Color All-Sky Images , 2006 .

[15]  Josep Calbó,et al.  Feature Extraction from Whole-Sky Ground-Based Images for Cloud-Type Recognition , 2008 .

[16]  C. Long,et al.  Cloud Coverage Based on All-Sky Imaging and Its Impact on Surface Solar Irradiance , 2003 .