Dynamic capabilities and sustainability performance: Exploring the moderating role of environmental dynamism in the Norwegian fishing industry

[1]  Mercedes Luque-Vílchez,et al.  Deconstructing corporate environmental, social, and governance performance: Heterogeneous stakeholder preferences in the food industry , 2023, Sustainable Development.

[2]  Miao Li.  Green governance and corporate social responsibility: The role of big data analytics , 2022, Sustainable Development.

[3]  O. Boiral,et al.  Sustainable development and stakeholder engagement in the agri‐food sector: Exploring the nexus between biodiversity conservation and information technology , 2022, Sustainable Development.

[4]  Lixu Li.  Digital transformation and sustainable performance: The moderating role of market turbulence , 2022, Industrial Marketing Management.

[5]  Hans V. Bjelland,et al.  Technological innovations promoting sustainable salmon (Salmo salar) aquaculture in Norway , 2022, Aquaculture Reports.

[6]  P. Dey,et al.  The role of circular economy principles and sustainable-oriented innovation to enhance social, economic and environmental performance: Evidence from Mexican SMEs , 2022, International Journal of Production Economics.

[7]  I. Bose,et al.  Performance effects of analytics capability, disruption orientation, and resilience in the supply chain under environmental uncertainty , 2022, Annals of Operations Research.

[8]  T. Papadopoulos,et al.  A planetary boundaries perspective on the sustainability: resilience relationship in the Kenyan tea supply chain , 2021, Ann. Oper. Res..

[9]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[10]  N. Richter,et al.  Necessary conditions in international business research–Advancing the field with a new perspective on causality and data analysis , 2022, Journal of World Business.

[11]  S. Seuring,et al.  Reflecting on theory development in sustainable supply chain management , 2021, Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain.

[12]  K. Arun,et al.  Narratives of environmental munificence of 3PL firms on the relationship between dynamic capabilities, strategic management and organizational performance , 2021, Journal of Strategy and Management.

[13]  Feng Zhang,et al.  Social media strategic capability, organizational unlearning, and disruptive innovation of SMEs: The moderating roles of TMT heterogeneity and environmental dynamism , 2021 .

[14]  S. Gold,et al.  Dynamic capabilities for sustainable change in the food processing industry: A multilevel perspective , 2021 .

[15]  G. Jyoti,et al.  Does sustainability perforcmance impact financial performance? Evidence from Indian service sector firms , 2021 .

[16]  S. Seuring,et al.  Dynamic capabilities in sustainable supply chain management: An inter-temporal comparison of the food and automotive industries , 2021, International Journal of Production Economics.

[17]  F. Tubiello,et al.  Food systems are responsible for a third of global anthropogenic GHG emissions , 2021, Nature Food.

[18]  S. Gold,et al.  Exploring the roles of lead organisations in spreading sustainability standards throughout food supply chains in an emerging economy , 2021 .

[19]  Kannan Govindan,et al.  Social sustainability tensions in multi-tier supply chain: A systematic literature review towards conceptual framework development , 2021, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[20]  J. Heydari,et al.  Consumers' preferences in purchasing recycled/refurbished products: an empirical investigation , 2021, International Journal of Services and Operations Management.

[21]  Feng Zhang,et al.  How Does Environmental Dynamism Impact Green Process Innovation? A Supply Chain Cooperation Perspective , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[22]  J. Sarkis.  Supply chain sustainability: learning from the COVID-19 pandemic , 2020, International Journal of Operations & Production Management.

[23]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  When predictors of outcomes are necessary: guidelines for the combined use of PLS-SEM and NCA , 2020, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[24]  Christian Nitzl,et al.  Beyond a tandem analysis of SEM and PROCESS: Use of PLS-SEM for mediation analyses! , 2020 .

[25]  J. Dul,et al.  A Statistical Significance Test for Necessary Condition Analysis , 2020 .

[26]  S. Seuring,et al.  Social Sustainability Empowering the Economic Sustainability in the Global Apparel Supply Chain , 2020, Sustainability.

[27]  Jagjit Singh Srai,et al.  A relational embeddedness perspective on dynamic capabilities: A grounded investigation of buyer-supplier routines , 2020 .

[28]  Taiwen Feng,et al.  How environmental orientation influences firm performance: The missing link of green supply chain integration , 2020 .

[29]  Hua Shang,et al.  Dynamic sustainability capabilities and corporate sustainability performance: The mediating effect of resource management capabilities , 2020 .

[30]  João J. Ferreira,et al.  Dynamic capabilities and performance: How has the relationship been assessed? , 2019, Journal of Management & Organization.

[31]  R. Chavez,et al.  Dynamism, disruption orientation, and resilience in the supply chain and the impacts on financial performance: A dynamic capabilities perspective , 2019 .

[32]  Ulf Johansen,et al.  The Norwegian seafood industry – Importance for the national economy , 2019 .

[33]  Stefan Seuring,et al.  Assessing the role of dynamic capabilities in local food distribution: a theory-elaboration study , 2019, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal.

[34]  E. Ravagnan,et al.  Governing for sustainability in the Norwegian aquaculture industry , 2019, Ocean & Coastal Management.

[35]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  How to Specify, Estimate, and Validate Higher-Order Constructs in PLS-SEM , 2019, Australasian Marketing Journal.

[36]  B. Bertheussen,et al.  Strategic sources of superprofit in a well-regulated fishery , 2019, Marine Policy.

[37]  O. Bergesen,et al.  Innovation in seafood value chains: the case of Norway , 2019, Aquaculture Economics & Management.

[38]  Marco Guerci,et al.  Exploring necessary conditions in HRM research: Fundamental issues and methodological implications , 2019, Human Resource Management Journal.

[39]  Annachiara Longoni,et al.  A systematic review of sustainable supply chain management in global supply chains , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[40]  H. Ting,et al.  MODERATION ANALYSIS: ISSUES AND GUIDELINES , 2019, Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling.

[41]  Melanie J. Davis,et al.  How commercial fishing effort is managed , 2018, Fish and Fisheries.

[42]  Hefu Liu,et al.  Top managers' managerial ties, supply chain integration, and firm performance in China: A social capital perspective , 2018, Industrial Marketing Management.

[43]  Gopal Kumar,et al.  Missing link between sustainability collaborative strategy and supply chain performance: Role of dynamic capability , 2018, International Journal of Production Economics.

[44]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  The use of sampling methods in advertising research: a gap between theory and practice , 2018 .

[45]  Constantin Blome,et al.  Dynamic supply chain capabilities , 2018, International Journal of Operations & Production Management.

[46]  M. Sarstedt,et al.  ESTIMATING MODERATING EFFECTS IN PLS-SEM AND PLSc-SEM: INTERACTION TERM GENERATION*DATA TREATMENT , 2018, Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling.

[47]  C. Salvato,et al.  The sources of dynamism in dynamic capabilities , 2018 .

[48]  Stephanie Graham,et al.  The relationship between downstream environmental logistics practices and performance , 2018 .

[49]  Jiangtao Hong,et al.  Sustainable supply chain management practices, supply chain dynamic capabilities, and enterprise performance , 2018 .

[50]  Ned Kock,et al.  Minimum sample size estimation in PLS‐SEM: The inverse square root and gamma‐exponential methods , 2018, Inf. Syst. J..

[51]  Thomas J. Kull,et al.  Small and Medium Enterprise Research in Supply Chain Management: The Case for Single‐Respondent Research Designs , 2018 .

[52]  Daniel R. Krause,et al.  Building the Case for A Single Key Informant in Supply Chain Management Survey Research , 2018 .

[53]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Quo Vadis, Dynamic Capabilities? A Content-Analytic Review of the Current State of Knowledge and Recommendations for Future Research , 2018 .

[54]  Antonio L. Leal-Rodríguez,et al.  Assessing the origins, evolution and prospects of the literature on dynamic capabilities: A bibliometric analysis , 2018 .

[55]  Yu-Shan Chen,et al.  Determinants of green competitive advantage: the roles of green knowledge sharing, green dynamic capabilities, and green service innovation , 2017 .

[56]  Richard Whittington,et al.  Reconfiguration, restructuring and firm performance: Dynamic capabilities and environmental dynamism , 2017 .

[57]  E. Lambin,et al.  Corporate investments in supply chain sustainability: Selecting instruments in the agri-food industry , 2017 .

[58]  Edward E. Rigdon,et al.  Choosing PLS path modeling as analytical method in European management research: A realist perspective , 2016 .

[59]  Ki-Jung Ju,et al.  Causal Relationship between Supply Chain Dynamic Capabilities, Technological Innovation, and Operational Performance , 2016 .

[60]  Amir Pezeshkan,et al.  An empirical assessment of the dynamic capabilities–performance relationship , 2016 .

[61]  Ray Hilborn,et al.  Global fishery prospects under contrasting management regimes , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[62]  Jörg Henseler,et al.  Consistent Partial Least Squares Path Modeling , 2015, MIS Q..

[63]  Waleed Omri.  Innovative behavior and venture performance of SMEs , 2015 .

[64]  Indre Maurer,et al.  How Dynamic Capabilities Affect the Effectiveness and Efficiency of Operating Routines Under High and Low Levels of Environmental Dynamism , 2015 .

[65]  Ralf Wilden,et al.  The impact of dynamic capabilities on operational marketing and technological capabilities: investigating the role of environmental turbulence , 2015 .

[66]  A. Hayes.  An Index and Test of Linear Moderated Mediation , 2015, Multivariate behavioral research.

[67]  Ralf W. Seifert,et al.  Dynamic Capabilities in Sustainable Supply Chain Management: A Theoretical Framework , 2015 .

[68]  Catherine L. Wang,et al.  Success Traps, Dynamic Capabilities and Firm Performance , 2015 .

[69]  M. Sarstedt,et al.  A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling , 2015 .

[70]  A. Paulraj,et al.  Complementarity effect of governance mechanisms on environmental collaboration: does it exist? , 2014 .

[71]  Stefan Seuring,et al.  Sustainable supply chain management practices and dynamic capabilities in the food industry: A critical analysis of the literature , 2014 .

[72]  Joerg S. Hofstetter,et al.  Critical factors for sub-supplier management: A sustainable food supply chains perspective , 2014 .

[73]  D. Teece.  The Foundations of Enterprise Performance: Dynamic and Ordinary Capabilities in an (Economic) Theory of Firms , 2014 .

[74]  Hai Guo,et al.  Managerial Political Ties and firm Performance During Institutional Transitions: An Analysis of Mediating Mechanisms , 2014 .

[75]  Oliver Schilke.  On the Contingent Value of Dynamic Capabilities for Competitive Advantage: The Nonlinear Moderating Effect of Environmental Dynamism , 2014 .

[76]  Mark Pagell,et al.  Why Research in Sustainable Supply Chain Management Should Have No Future , 2014 .

[77]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Constructing sustainable supply chain under double environmental medium regulations , 2014 .

[78]  Juan Liu,et al.  Dynamic capabilities, environmental dynamism, and competitive advantage: Evidence from China , 2014 .

[79]  Sascha Kraus,et al.  Innovation in knowledge-intensive industries: The double-edged sword of coopetition , 2013 .

[80]  A. Michael Knemeyer,et al.  Exploring the integration of sustainability and supply chain management , 2013 .

[81]  Yu Cui,et al.  When should organizational change be implemented? The moderating effect of environmental dynamism between dynamic capabilities and new venture performance , 2013 .

[82]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Editorial - Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling: Rigorous Applications, Better Results and Higher Acceptance , 2013 .

[83]  Ralf Wilden,et al.  Dynamic capabilities and performance : strategy, structure and environment , 2013 .

[84]  Martin Wetzels,et al.  Hierarchical latent variable models in PLS-SEM: guidelines for using reflective-formative type models , 2012 .

[85]  William Lewis,et al.  Does PLS Have Advantages for Small Sample Size or Non-Normal Data? , 2012, MIS Q..

[86]  Alison Ashby,et al.  Making connections: a review of supply chain management and sustainability literature , 2012 .

[87]  Philip Beske,et al.  Dynamic capabilities and sustainable supply chain management , 2012 .

[88]  Adrie J. M. Beulens,et al.  Transparency in complex dynamic food supply chains , 2012, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[89]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Working memory: theories, models, and controversies. , 2012, Annual review of psychology.

[90]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Untangling dynamic and operational capabilities: strategy for the (n)ever-changing world , 2011 .

[91]  K. Lai,et al.  An Organizational Theoretic Review of Green Supply Chain Management Literature , 2011 .

[92]  Enno Siemsen,et al.  Common Method Bias in Regression Models With Linear, Quadratic, and Interaction Effects , 2010 .

[93]  E. Hartmann,et al.  Managing supplier sustainability risks in a dynamically changing environment—Sustainable supplier management in the chemical industry , 2010 .

[94]  Lei-Yu Wu,et al.  Applicability of the resource-based and dynamic-capability views under environmental volatility , 2010 .

[95]  S. Seuring,et al.  Sustainable supply chain management and inter-organizational resources: a literature review , 2009 .

[96]  Margot J. Hutchins,et al.  An exploration of measures of social sustainability and their application to supply chain decisions , 2008 .

[97]  D. Teece.  Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance , 2007 .

[98]  Daniel C. Bello,et al.  Institutional antecedents and performance consequences of influence strategies in export channels to Eastern European transitional economies , 2006 .

[99]  D. Siegel,et al.  Corporate social responsibility and economic performance , 2006 .

[100]  Louise Manning,et al.  Deliberate contamination of the food supply chain , 2005 .

[101]  Leo Paul Dana,et al.  Expanding the scope of methodologies used in entrepreneurship research , 2005 .

[102]  S. Winter.  Understanding dynamic capabilities , 2003 .

[103]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[104]  Maurizio Zollo,et al.  Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities , 2002 .

[105]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[106]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[107]  L. Stern,et al.  Conducting Interorganizational Research Using Key Informants , 1993 .

[108]  Jan-Bernd Lohmöller,et al.  Latent Variable Path Modeling with Partial Least Squares , 1989 .

[109]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error , 1981 .

[110]  Terry S. Overton,et al.  Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys , 1977 .