GRAMMATICAL AND SEMANTIC DISAMBIGUATION OF REQUIREMENTS AT ELICITATION AND REPRESENTATION STAGES

The final outcome of a design process depends a lot on the initial conditions of this process. The initial design conditions can be viewed as the initial definition and representation of the design problem in the form of requirement model. Describing the requirements involves considering their elicitation and its transformation in a form that can be further used by engineering designers. These two phases of requirements, elicitation and representation, involve by nature linguistic description. Users, stakeholders or designers express themselves through natural language. Semantics considerations involve understanding aspects that comes down to word selection or connotation but also interpretation aspects of written terms used by communities or persons within particular circumstances and contexts. The present research work is constructed around a central hypothesis: Final design outcomes are strongly dependent on the initial design conditions because of the recursive nature of the design activity. The present article claims that computer tools can support the disambiguation process associated with elicitation and representation. For this reason the authors have developed an experimental process aiming at reducing ambiguity of the parts of the initial conditions of the design process that are expressed in natural language. This disambiguation is considering several levels: the grammar, words selection and context description.Copyright © 2011 by ASME

[1]  Alon Itai,et al.  Word Sense Disambiguation Using a Second Language Monolingual Corpus , 1994, CL.

[2]  Brian Everitt,et al.  Cluster analysis , 1974 .

[3]  Lei Chen,et al.  Computer-assisted transformation of design documents from a natural language description to structured modeling languages , 2008 .

[4]  Bernard Victorri,et al.  Construction d'espaces sémantiques à l'aide de dictionnaires de synonymes , 1998 .

[5]  Sabine Ploux,et al.  Modélisation et Traitement Informatique de la Synonymie , 1997 .

[6]  Patrick Pantel,et al.  Concept Discovery from Text , 2002, COLING.

[7]  Yong Zeng,et al.  Understanding design activities through computer simulation , 2009, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[8]  Hyungsuk Ji,et al.  A Model for Matching Semantic Maps between Languages (French/English, English/French) , 2003, CL.

[9]  A. D. Gordon,et al.  Correspondence Analysis Handbook. , 1993 .

[10]  Yong Zeng,et al.  On the logic of design , 1991 .

[11]  Ozgur Eris,et al.  ASKING GENERATIVE DESIGN QUESTIONS: A FUNDAMENTAL COGNITIVE MECHANISM IN DESIGN THINKING , 2003 .

[12]  Alain Bernard,et al.  RFBS: A model for knowledge representation of conceptual design , 2010 .

[13]  Yong Zeng,et al.  Environment-Based formulation of Design Problem , 2004, Trans. SDPS.

[14]  Rob H. Bracewell,et al.  Characterising in detail the information requests of engineering designers , 2006 .

[15]  Yong Zeng,et al.  Classification of Product Requirements Based on Product Environment , 2006, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[16]  Donald A. Schön.  Designing as reflective conversation with the materials of a design situation , 1992, Knowl. Based Syst..

[17]  Ozgur Eris,et al.  Effective Inquiry for Innovative Engineering Design , 2004 .

[18]  Eric Wehrli,et al.  Lexical Knowledge Representation with Contexonyms , 2003 .

[19]  Min Wang,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing Asking the Right Questions to Elicit Product Requirements Asking the Right Questions to Elicit Product Requirements , 2022 .

[20]  Yong Zeng,et al.  Recursive object model (ROM) - Modelling of linguistic information in engineering design , 2008, Comput. Ind..

[21]  Eric Buyssens,et al.  La communication et l'articulation linguistique , 1967 .

[22]  Gilbert Saporta,et al.  L'analyse des données , 1981 .

[23]  Yong Zeng,et al.  A science-based approach to product design theory Part I: formulation and formalization of design process , 1999 .

[24]  H. Simon.  Bounded Rationality and Organizational Learning , 1991 .

[25]  John F. Sowa,et al.  Conceptual Structures: Information Processing in Mind and Machine , 1983 .