Problem-based learning for professionalism and scientific integrity training of biomedical graduate students: process evaluation

Objective We conducted a process evaluation to (a) assess the effectiveness of a new problem-based learning curriculum designed to teach professionalism and scientific integrity to biomedical graduate students and (b) modify the course to enhance its relevance and effectiveness. The content presented realistic cases and issues in the practice of science, to promote skill development and to acculturate students to professional norms of science. Method We used 5-step Likert-scaled questions, open-ended questions, and interviews of students and facilitators to assess curricular effectiveness. Results Both facilitators and students perceived course objectives were achieved. For example, respondents preferred active learning over lectures; both faculty and students perceived that the curriculum increased their understanding of norms, role obligations and responsibilities of professional scientists. They also reported an increased ability to identify ethical situations and felt that they had developed skills in moral reasoning and effective group work. Conclusions These data helped to improve course implementation and instructional material. For example, to correct a negative perception that this was an ‘ethics’ course, we redesigned case debriefing activities to reinforce learning objectives and important skills. We refined cases to be more engaging and relevant for students, and gave facilitators more specific training and resources for each case. The problem-based learning small group strategy can stimulate an environment whereby participants are more aware of ethical implications of science, and increase their socialisation and open communication about professional behaviour.

[1]  S. Brookfield Understanding and Facilitating Adult Learning: A Comprehensive Analysis of Principles and Effective Practices , 1986 .

[2]  M. Bebeau Moral Reasoning in Scientific Research: Cases for Teaching and Assessment. , 1995 .

[3]  Michael W. Kalichman,et al.  Effectiveness of a responsible conduct of research course: a preliminary study , 2007, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[4]  Melissa S. Anderson Collective Openness and Other Recommendations for the Promotion of Research Integrity , 2007, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[5]  Shane Connelly,et al.  A Sensemaking Approach to Ethics Training for Scientists: Preliminary Evidence of Training Effectiveness , 2008, Ethics & behavior.

[6]  Henriikka Clarkeburn,et al.  Impact of an Ethics Programme in a Life Sciences Curriculum , 2002 .

[7]  Kenneth W Goodman,et al.  The CITI Program: An International Online Resource for Education in Human Subjects Protection and the Responsible Conduct of Research , 2007, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[8]  Ruth Ellen Bulger,et al.  The History, Purpose, and Future of Instruction in the Responsible Conduct of Research , 2007, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[9]  Kelly R Risbey,et al.  What Do Mentoring and Training in the Responsible Conduct of Research Have To Do with Scientists’ Misbehavior? Findings from a National Survey of NIH-Funded Scientists , 2007, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[10]  P. Laurienti,et al.  Fostering a Culture of Responsible Lab Conduct , 2008, Science.

[11]  M J Bebeau,et al.  The impact of a dental ethics curriculum on moral reasoning. , 1994, Journal of dental education.

[12]  M. Kalichman,et al.  Responding to Challenges in Educating for the Responsible Conduct of Research , 2007, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[13]  P. Friedman,et al.  A pilot study of biomedical trainees' perceptions concerning research ethics , 1992, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[14]  E. Heitman,et al.  Expanding Responsible Conduct of Research Instruction across the University , 2007, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[15]  M. Kalichman,et al.  Student perceptions of the effectiveness of education in the responsible conduct of research , 2006, Science and engineering ethics.

[16]  Carol B. Aslanian Adults as Learners: Increasing Participation and Facilitating Learning , 1983 .

[17]  M. Knowles The Modern practice of adult education : andragogy versus pedagogy / , 1970 .

[18]  S. Athar Principles of Biomedical Ethics , 2011, The Journal of IMA.

[19]  M. Kalichman,et al.  Reported Goals for Responsible Conduct of Research Courses , 2007, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.