Rotation, Strain, and Translation Sensors Performance Tests with Active Seismic Sources

Interest in measuring displacement gradients, such as rotation and strain, is growing in many areas of geophysical research. This results in an urgent demand for reliable and field-deployable instruments measuring these quantities. In order to further establish a high-quality standard for rotation and strain measurements in seismology, we organized a comparative sensor test experiment that took place in November 2019 at the Geophysical Observatory of the Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich in Fürstenfeldbruck, Germany. More than 24 different sensors, including three-component and single-component broadband rotational seismometers, six-component strong-motion sensors and Rotaphone systems, as well as the large ring laser gyroscopes ROMY and a Distributed Acoustic Sensing system, were involved in addition to 14 classical broadband seismometers and a 160 channel, 4.5 Hz geophone chain. The experiment consisted of two parts: during the first part, the sensors were co-located in a huddle test recording self-noise and signals from small, nearby explosions. In a second part, the sensors were distributed into the field in various array configurations recording seismic signals that were generated by small amounts of explosive and a Vibroseis truck. This paper presents details on the experimental setup and a first sensor performance comparison focusing on sensor self-noise, signal-to-noise ratios, and waveform similarities for the rotation rate sensors. Most of the sensors show a high level of coherency and waveform similarity within a narrow frequency range between 10 Hz and 20 Hz for recordings from a nearby explosion signal. Sensor as well as experiment design are critically accessed revealing the great need for reliable reference sensors.

[1]  Wilhelm Schlüter Schwingungsart und Weg der Erdbebenwellen , 1901 .

[2]  Heiner Igel,et al.  Seafloor ground rotation observations: potential for improving signal-to-noise ratio on horizontal OBS components , 2015 .

[3]  Antonino D'Alessandro,et al.  A Review of the Capacitive MEMS for Seismology , 2019, Sensors.

[4]  J. Holland,et al.  Sensor Suite: The Albuquerque Seismological Laboratory Instrumentation Testing Suite , 2018, Seismological Research Letters.

[5]  Charles R. Hutt,et al.  Seismometer Self-Noise and Measuring Methods , 2014 .

[6]  Duncan Carr Agnew,et al.  Comparing Direct Observation of Strain, Rotation, and Displacement with Array Estimates at Piñon Flat Observatory, California , 2017 .

[7]  Leszek R. Jaroszewicz,et al.  Two Correlated Interferometric Optical Fiber Systems Applied to the Mining Activity Recordings , 2019, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[8]  Jan Kodet,et al.  Reconstruction of the Instantaneous Earth Rotation Vector with Sub-Arcsecond Resolution Using a Large Scale Ring Laser Array. , 2020, Physical review letters.

[9]  Jiří Málek,et al.  Six-degree-of-freedom near-source seismic motions II: examples of real seismogram analysis and S-wave velocity retrieval , 2015, Journal of Seismology.

[10]  D. W. Allan,et al.  Statistics of atomic frequency standards , 1966 .

[11]  Zbigniew Zembaty,et al.  Application of Rotation Rate Sensors in Modal and Vibration Analyses of Reinforced Concrete Beams , 2020, Sensors.

[12]  Horst Rademacher,et al.  On the Broadband Instrument Response of Fiber‐Optic DAS Arrays , 2019, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth.

[13]  Ulrich Schreiber,et al.  Comparison of standard and ring laser rotational seismograms , 1998, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[14]  Z. Zhan Distributed Acoustic Sensing Turns Fiber‐Optic Cables into Sensitive Seismic Antennas , 2019 .

[15]  Reinoud Sleeman,et al.  Three-Channel Correlation Analysis: A New Technique to Measure Instrumental Noise of Digitizers and Seismic Sensors , 2006 .

[16]  Jon-Paul R. Wells,et al.  On the application of fiber optic gyroscopes for detection of seismic rotations , 2012, Journal of Seismology.

[17]  Charles R. Hutt,et al.  Self‐Noise Models of Five Commercial Strong‐Motion Accelerometers , 2015 .

[18]  Aslak Grinsted,et al.  Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics Application of the Cross Wavelet Transform and Wavelet Coherence to Geophysical Time Series , 2022 .

[19]  Heiner Igel,et al.  Seismological Processing of Six Degree-of-Freedom Ground-Motion Data , 2020, Sensors.

[20]  Stefanie Donner,et al.  Advances in 6C seismology: Applications of combined translational and rotational motion measurements in global and exploration seismology , 2018 .

[21]  Jonathan B. Ajo-Franklin,et al.  Illuminating seafloor faults and ocean dynamics with dark fiber distributed acoustic sensing , 2019, Science.

[22]  Stewart Greenhalgh,et al.  6-C polarization analysis using point measurements of translational and rotational ground-motion: theory and applications , 2018 .

[23]  Zbigniew Zembaty,et al.  Application of rotation rate sensors in an experiment of stiffness ‘reconstruction’ , 2013 .

[24]  Stefanie Donner,et al.  Six Degree-of-Freedom Broadband Ground-Motion Observations with Portable Sensors: Validation, Local Earthquakes, and Signal Processing , 2020 .

[25]  Arthur H. Hartog,et al.  An Introduction to Distributed Optical Fibre Sensors , 2017 .

[26]  Günter Asch Seismic Recording Systems , 2009 .

[27]  Anna Kurzych,et al.  The Fiber-Optic Rotational Seismograph—Laboratory Tests and Field Application , 2019, Sensors.

[28]  Dante Fratta,et al.  Ground motion response to an ML 4.3 earthquake using co-located distributed acoustic sensing and seismometer arrays , 2018 .

[29]  K. Pearson VII. Note on regression and inheritance in the case of two parents , 1895, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London.

[30]  K. Raju,et al.  Fiber Optic Gyroscope , 2004 .

[31]  Duncan Carr Agnew,et al.  Continuous measurements of crustal deformation for the 1992 Landers earthquake sequence , 1994 .

[32]  Jan Kodet,et al.  ROMY: A Multi-Component Ring Laser for Geodesy and Geophysics , 2020 .

[33]  Barry Freifeld,et al.  Distributed Acoustic Sensing for Seismic Monitoring of The Near Surface: A Traffic-Noise Interferometry Case Study , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[34]  Erhard Wielandt,et al.  Seismic Sensors and their Calibration , 2009 .

[35]  B. Shiro,et al.  Six‐Axis Ground Motion Measurements of Caldera Collapse at Kīlauea Volcano, Hawai'i—More Data, More Puzzles? , 2020, Geophysical Research Letters.

[36]  A. Pancha,et al.  Ring laser detection of rotations from teleseismic waves , 2000 .

[37]  T. Daley,et al.  Field testing of modular borehole monitoring with simultaneous distributed acoustic sensing and geophone vertical seismic profiles at Citronelle, Alabama , 2016 .

[38]  Charles R. Hutt,et al.  Laboratory and Field Testing of Commercial Rotational Seismometers , 2009 .

[39]  K. Venkateswara,et al.  A high-precision mechanical absolute-rotation sensor. , 2014, The Review of scientific instruments.

[40]  J. Wassermann,et al.  Single-station seismic microzonation using 6C measurements , 2020, Journal of Seismology.

[41]  C. Torrence,et al.  A Practical Guide to Wavelet Analysis. , 1998 .

[42]  Heiner Igel,et al.  BlueSeis3A: Full Characterization of a 3C Broadband Rotational Seismometer , 2018 .

[43]  Wu-Cheng Chi,et al.  Rotational motions for teleseismic surface waves , 2011 .

[44]  Jiří Málek,et al.  Rotaphone, a Self‐Calibrated Six‐Degree‐of‐Freedom Seismic Sensor and Its Strong‐Motion Records , 2013 .

[45]  E. Muyzert,et al.  Rotational Data Measurement , 2013 .

[46]  M. Chmiel,et al.  Distributed acoustic sensing of microseismic sources and wave propagation in glaciated terrain , 2020, Nature Communications.

[47]  Vadim M. Agafonov,et al.  Electrochemical Seismometers of Linear and Angular Motion , 2015 .

[48]  David Mimoun,et al.  Exploring planets and asteroids with 6DoF sensors: Utopia and realism , 2020, Earth, Planets and Space.

[49]  Athol J. Carr,et al.  The Application of Fiber Optic Gyroscopes for the Measurement of Rotations in Structural Engineering , 2009 .

[50]  Douglas E. Miller,et al.  Field testing of fiber-optic distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) for subsurface seismic monitoring , 2013 .

[51]  Heiner Igel,et al.  Toward a Single‐Station Approach for Microzonation: Using Vertical Rotation Rate to Estimate Love‐Wave Dispersion Curves and Direction Finding , 2016 .

[52]  David Clifford Wilson,et al.  Repeatability of Testing a Small Broadband Sensor in the Albuquerque Seismological Laboratory Underground Vault , 2017 .

[53]  P. Jousset,et al.  Dynamic strain determination using fibre-optic cables allows imaging of seismological and structural features , 2018, Nature Communications.

[54]  Patrick Paitz,et al.  Empirical Investigations of the Instrument Response for Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS) across 17 Octaves , 2020 .

[55]  Charles R. Hutt,et al.  Guidelines for Standardized Testing of Broadband Seismometers and Accelerometers , 2010 .

[56]  Heiner Igel,et al.  Rotational sensors—a comparison of different sensor types , 2012, Journal of Seismology.

[57]  Charles R. Hutt,et al.  Measuring rotational ground motions in seismological practice , 2012 .

[58]  Peter Bormann,et al.  New Manual of Seismological Observatory Practice , 2002 .

[59]  Lionel Quetel,et al.  Fiber optic monitoring of active faults at the seafloor: I the FOCUS project , 2019, Photoniques.