TROPOMI/S5P total ozone column data: global ground-based validation and consistency with other satellite missions

Abstract. In October 2017, the Sentinel-5 Precursor (S5P) mission was launched, carrying the TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI), which provides a daily global coverage at a spatial resolution as high as 7 km × 3.5 km and is expected to extend the European atmospheric composition record initiated with GOME/ERS-2 in 1995, enhancing our scientific knowledge of atmospheric processes with its unprecedented spatial resolution. Due to the ongoing need to understand and monitor the recovery of the ozone layer, as well as the evolution of tropospheric pollution, total ozone remains one of the leading species of interest during this mission. In this work, the TROPOMI near real time (NRTI) and offline (OFFL) total ozone column (TOC) products are presented and compared to daily ground-based quality-assured Brewer and Dobson TOC measurements deposited in the World Ozone and Ultraviolet Radiation Data Centre (WOUDC). Additional comparisons to individual Brewer measurements from the Canadian Brewer Network and the European Brewer Network (Eubrewnet) are performed. Furthermore, twilight zenith-sky measurements obtained with ZSL-DOAS (Zenith Scattered Light Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy) instruments, which form part of the SAOZ network (Système d'Analyse par Observation Zénitale), are used for the validation. The quality of the TROPOMI TOC data is evaluated in terms of the influence of location, solar zenith angle, viewing angle, season, effective temperature, surface albedo and clouds. For this purpose, globally distributed ground-based measurements have been utilized as the background truth. The overall statistical analysis of the global comparison shows that the mean bias and the mean standard deviation of the percentage difference between TROPOMI and ground-based TOC is within 0 –1.5 % and 2.5 %–4.5 %, respectively. The mean bias that results from the comparisons is well within the S5P product requirements, while the mean standard deviation is very close to those limits, especially considering that the statistics shown here originate both from the satellite and the ground-based measurements. Additionally, the TROPOMI OFFL and NRTI products are evaluated against already known spaceborne sensors, namely, the Ozone Mapping Profiler Suite, on board the Suomi National Polar-orbiting Partnership (OMPS/Suomi-NPP), NASA v2 TOCs, and the Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment 2 (GOME-2), on board the Metop-A (GOME-2/Metop-A) and Metop-B (GOME-2/Metop-B) satellites. This analysis shows a very good agreement for both TROPOMI products with well-established instruments, with the absolute differences in mean bias and mean standard deviation being below +0.7 % and 1 %, respectively. These results assure the scientific community of the good quality of the TROPOMI TOC products during its first year of operation and enhance the already prevalent expectation that TROPOMI/S5P will play a very significant role in the continuity of ozone monitoring from space.

[1]  Jian Xu,et al.  Applying FP_ILM to the retrieval of geometry-dependent effective Lambertian equivalent reflectivity (GE_LER) to account for BRDF effects on UVN satellite measurements of trace gases, clouds and aerosols , 2019 .

[2]  Jian Xu,et al.  Monitoring and assimilation tests with TROPOMI data in the CAMS system: near-real-time total column ozone , 2019, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[3]  N. Theys,et al.  Global monitoring of volcanic SO2 degassing with unprecedented resolution from TROPOMI onboard Sentinel-5 Precursor , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[4]  Mengistu Wolde,et al.  High‐Resolution Mapping of Nitrogen Dioxide With TROPOMI: First Results and Validation Over the Canadian Oil Sands , 2019, Geophysical research letters.

[5]  Pepijn Veefkind,et al.  Pre-launch calibration results of the TROPOMI payload on-board the Sentinel-5 Precursor satellite , 2018, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[6]  J. Landgraf,et al.  Global Retrievals of Solar‐Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence With TROPOMI: First Results and Intersensor Comparison to OCO‐2 , 2018, Geophysical research letters.

[7]  Pieter Valks,et al.  Validation of the IASI FORLI/EUMETSAT ozone products using satellite (GOME-2), ground-based (Brewer–Dobson, SAOZ, FTIR) and ozonesonde measurements , 2018, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[8]  A. Redondas,et al.  EuBrewNet – A European Brewer network (COST Action ES1207), an overview , 2018, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[9]  Haili Hu,et al.  Toward Global Mapping of Methane With TROPOMI: First Results and Intersatellite Comparison to GOSAT , 2018 .

[10]  T. Borsdorff,et al.  Measuring Carbon Monoxide With TROPOMI: First Results and a Comparison With ECMWF‐IFS Analysis Data , 2018 .

[11]  C. Clerbaux,et al.  Quality assessment of the Ozone_cci Climate Research Data Package (release 2017) – Part 1: Ground-based validation of total ozone column data products , 2018, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[12]  L. G. Tilstra,et al.  The Ozone Monitoring Instrument: overview of 14 years in space , 2017 .

[13]  Adrian Doicu,et al.  The operational cloud retrieval algorithms from TROPOMI on board Sentinel-5 Precursor , 2017 .

[14]  Xiong Liu,et al.  Absorption cross-sections of Ozone in the ultraviolet and visible spectral regions – Status report 2015 , 2016 .

[15]  M. Koukouli,et al.  The impact of the ozone effective temperature on satellite validation using the Dobson spectrophotometer network , 2016 .

[16]  Dimitris Balis,et al.  Evaluating a new homogeneous total ozone climate data record from GOME/ERS‐2, SCIAMACHY/Envisat, and GOME‐2/MetOp‐A , 2015 .

[17]  Christophe Lerot,et al.  Metrology of ground-based satellite validation: co-location mismatch and smoothing issues of total ozone comparisons , 2015 .

[18]  Christos Zerefos,et al.  Overview of the O3M SAF GOME-2 operational atmospheric composition and UV radiation data products and data availability , 2015 .

[19]  A. Bais,et al.  The Effect of Three Different Absorption Cross-Sections and their Temperature Dependence on Total Ozone Measured by a Mid-Latitude Brewer Spectrophotometer , 2015 .

[20]  M. Koukouli,et al.  GOME-2 total ozone columns from MetOp-A/MetOp-B and assimilation in the MACC system , 2014 .

[21]  Dimitris Balis,et al.  Homogenized total ozone data records from the European sensors GOME/ERS‐2, SCIAMACHY/Envisat, and GOME‐2/MetOp‐A , 2014 .

[22]  Xiong Liu,et al.  Validation of OMI total ozone retrievals from the SAO ozone profile algorithm and three operational algorithms with Brewer measurements , 2014 .

[23]  R. Evans,et al.  Evaluation of the use of five laboratory-determined ozone absorption cross sections in Brewer and Dobson retrieval algorithms , 2013 .

[24]  John P. Burrows,et al.  High spectral resolution ozone absorption cross-sections - Part 2: Temperature dependence , 2013 .

[25]  P. Bhartia,et al.  A comparison of 40 years of SBUV measurements of column ozone with data from the Dobson/Brewer network , 2013 .

[26]  Walter Zimmer,et al.  Geophysical validation and long-term consistency between GOME-2/MetOp-A total ozone column and measurements from the sensors GOME/ERS-2, SCIAMACHY/ENVISAT and OMI/Aura , 2012 .

[27]  Matthew T. DeLand,et al.  Solar Backscatter UV (SBUV) total ozone and profile algorithm , 2012 .

[28]  Richard D. McPeters,et al.  Climatology 2011: An MLS and sonde derived ozone climatology for satellite retrieval algorithms , 2012 .

[29]  Henk Eskes,et al.  TROPOMI on the ESA Sentinel-5 Precursor: A GMES mission for global observations of the atmospheric composition for climate, air quality and ozone layer applications , 2012 .

[30]  Pawan K. Bhartia,et al.  A global climatology of tropospheric and stratospheric ozone derived from Aura OMI and MLS measurements , 2011 .

[31]  F. Hendrick,et al.  NDACC/SAOZ UV-visible total ozone measurements: improved retrieval and comparison with correlative ground-based and satellite observations , 2011 .

[32]  C. T. McElroy,et al.  New method for deriving total ozone from Brewer zenith sky observations , 2011 .

[33]  Walter Zimmer,et al.  The GOME-2 total column ozone product: Retrieval algorithm and ground-based validation , 2011 .

[34]  J. Kerr.  The Brewer Spectrophotometer , 2010 .

[35]  J. Staehelin,et al.  Temperature and slant path effects in Dobson and Brewer total ozone measurements , 2009 .

[36]  Matthew T. DeLand,et al.  Measurements and products from the Solar Backscatter Ultraviolet (SBUV/2) and Ozone Mapping and Profiler Suite (OMPS) instruments , 2009 .

[37]  Walter Zimmer,et al.  Comparison of GOME-2/MetOp total ozone data with Brewer spectroradiometer data over the Iberian Peninsula , 2009 .

[38]  Robert J. D. Spurr,et al.  Six years of total ozone column measurements from SCIAMACHY nadir observations , 2008 .

[39]  Quintus Kleipool,et al.  Earth surface reflectance climatology from 3 years of OMI data , 2008 .

[40]  J. Staehelin,et al.  Performance of the ground-based total ozone network assessed using satellite data , 2008 .

[41]  Dimitris Balis,et al.  Validation of Ozone Monitoring Instrument total ozone column measurements using Brewer and Dobson spectrophotometer ground‐based observations , 2007 .

[42]  Pieter Valks,et al.  Ten years of GOME/ERS2 total ozone data—The new GOME data processor (GDP) version 4: 2. Ground-based validation and comparisons with TOMS V7/V8 , 2007 .

[43]  Pieter Valks,et al.  Ten years of GOME/ERS-2 total ozone data—The new GOME data processor (GDP) version 4: 1. Algorithm description , 2006 .

[44]  D. Wardle,et al.  The Brewer reference triad , 2005 .

[45]  G. Labow,et al.  Bias in Dobson total ozone measurements at high latitudes due to approximations in calculations of ozone absorption coefficients and air mass , 2005 .

[46]  D. Wardle,et al.  UV index climatology over the United States and Canada from ground‐based and satellite estimates , 2004 .

[47]  Michael Eisinger,et al.  Refinement of a Database of Spectral Surface Reflectivity in the Range 335-772 nm Derived from 5.5 Years of GOME Observations , 2003 .

[48]  James B. Kerr,et al.  New methodology for deriving total ozone and other atmospheric variables from Brewer spectrophotometer direct sun spectra , 2002 .

[49]  J. Brion,et al.  Absorption Spectra Measurements for the Ozone Molecule in the 350–830 nm Region , 1998 .

[50]  F. Goutail,et al.  Validation of Ground-Based Visible Measurements of Total Ozone by Comparison with Dobson and Brewer Spectrophotometers , 1998 .

[51]  J. Brion,et al.  Ozone UV spectroscopy. II. Absorption cross-sections and temperature dependence , 1995 .

[52]  J. Brion,et al.  Ozone UV spectroscopy I: Absorption cross-sections at room temperature , 1992 .

[53]  J. Kerr,et al.  Intercomparison of total ozone measured by the Brewer and Dobson spectrophotometers at Toronto , 1988 .

[54]  Florence Goutail,et al.  O3 and NO2 ground‐based measurements by visible spectrometry during Arctic winter and spring 1988 , 1988 .

[55]  Stanley C. Solomon,et al.  On the interpretation of zenith sky absorption measurements , 1987 .

[56]  R. Basher,et al.  Review of the Dobson Spectrophotometer and its Accuracy , 1985 .

[57]  R. J. Paur,et al.  The ultraviolet cross-sections of ozone. I. The measurements. II - Results and temperature dependence , 1985 .

[58]  John K. Lyon,et al.  What is a database , 1973, SGMD.