What happens when we switch tasks: pupil dilation in multitasking.

Interruption studies typically focus on external interruptions, even though self-interruptions occur at least as often in real work environments. In this article, we therefore contrast external interruptions with self-interruptions. Three multitasking experiments were conducted, in which we examined changes in pupil size when participants switched from a primary to a secondary task. Results showed an increase in pupil dilation several seconds before a self-interruption, which we could attribute to the decision to switch. This indicates that the decision takes a relatively large amount of time. This was supported by the fact that in Experiment 2, participants were significantly slower on the self-interruption blocks than on the external interruption blocks. These findings suggest that the decision to switch is costly, but may also be open for modification through appropriate training. In addition, we propose that if one must switch tasks, it can be more efficient to implement a forced switch after the completion of a subtask instead of leaving the decision to the user.

[1]  Niels Taatgen,et al.  Choice in Multitasking , 2014, Hum. Factors.

[2]  Duncan P. Brumby,et al.  Frequency and Duration of Self-Initiated Task-Switching in an Online Investigation of Interrupted Performance , 2013, HCOMP.

[3]  Jelmer P Borst,et al.  Avoiding the problem state bottleneck by strategic use of the environment. , 2013, Acta psychologica.

[4]  Jonathan Back,et al.  Recovering from an interruption: investigating speed-accuracy trade-offs in task resumption behavior. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[5]  Larry D. Rosen,et al.  Facebook and texting made me do it: Media-induced task-switching while studying , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[6]  Kimberly S. Chiew,et al.  Temporal Dynamics of Motivation-Cognitive Control Interactions Revealed by High-Resolution Pupillometry , 2013, Front. Psychology.

[7]  Jelle R. Dalenberg,et al.  Pupil Dilation Co-Varies with Memory Strength of Individual Traces in a Delayed Response Paired-Associate Task , 2012, PloS one.

[8]  Stefan M. Wierda,et al.  Pupil dilation deconvolution reveals the dynamics of attention at high temporal resolution , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Jian Yang,et al.  Using brain imaging to track problem solving in a complex state space , 2012, NeuroImage.

[10]  Víctor M. González,et al.  Why do i keep interrupting myself?: environment, habit and self-interruption , 2011, CHI.

[11]  Kristin Prehn,et al.  Influence of affective significance on different levels of processing using pupil dilation in an analogical reasoning task. , 2011, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[12]  Niels Taatgen,et al.  The Multitasking Mind , 2010, Oxford series on cognitive models and architectures.

[13]  Michele Miozzo,et al.  Pupillary Stroop effects , 2010, Cognitive Processing.

[14]  Marie P. Panepinto Voluntary versus Forced Task Switching , 2010 .

[15]  Dario D. Salvucci,et al.  Multitasking and monotasking: the effects of mental workload on deferred task interruptions , 2010, CHI.

[16]  N. Taatgen,et al.  The problem state: a cognitive bottleneck in multitasking. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  Christopher A. Monk,et al.  A Process-Model Account of Task Interruption and Resumption: When Does Encoding of the Problem State Occur? , 2009 .

[18]  Laura A. Dabbish,et al.  Self-interruption on the computer: a typology of discretionary task interleaving , 2009, CHI.

[19]  J. Trafton,et al.  The effect of interruption duration and demand on resuming suspended goals. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[20]  J. Jolles,et al.  Pupil dilation in response preparation. , 2008, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[21]  Theodore D. Satterthwaite,et al.  Dissociable but inter-related systems of cognitive control and reward during decision making: Evidence from pupillometry and event-related fMRI , 2007, NeuroImage.

[22]  Hansjörg Neth,et al.  Discretionary task interleaving: heuristics for time allocation in cognitive foraging. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[23]  Brian P. Bailey,et al.  Leveraging characteristics of task structure to predict the cost of interruption , 2006, CHI.

[24]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Interruption of the Tower of London task: support for a goal-activation approach. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[25]  Brian P. Bailey,et al.  Investigating the effectiveness of mental workload as a predictor of opportune moments for interruption , 2005, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[26]  Víctor M. González,et al.  No task left behind?: examining the nature of fragmented work , 2005, CHI.

[27]  Brian P. Bailey,et al.  Towards an index of opportunity: understanding changes in mental workload during task execution , 2004, CHI.

[28]  Christopher A. Monk,et al.  Recovering From Interruptions: Implications for Driver Distraction Research , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[29]  Víctor M. González,et al.  "Constant, constant, multi-tasking craziness": managing multiple working spheres , 2004, CHI.

[30]  Mary Czerwinski,et al.  A diary study of task switching and interruptions , 2004, CHI.

[31]  Brian P. Bailey,et al.  Categories & Subject Descriptors: H.5.2 [Information , 2022 .

[32]  Dylan Marc Jones,et al.  Interruptions in the Tower of London Task: Can Preparation Minimise Disruption? , 2003 .

[33]  J. Gregory Trafton,et al.  Preparing to resume an interrupted task: effects of prospective goal encoding and retrospective rehearsal , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[34]  Daniel C. McFarlane,et al.  Comparison of Four Primary Methods for Coordinating the Interruption of People in Human-Computer Interaction , 2002, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[35]  J. Gregory Trafton,et al.  Memory for goals: an activation-based model , 2002, Cogn. Sci..

[36]  W. Cordell,et al.  Emergency department workplace interruptions: are emergency physicians "interrupt-driven" and "multitasking"? , 2000, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[37]  J. Beatty,et al.  The pupillary system. , 2000 .

[38]  S. Monsell,et al.  Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks. , 1995 .

[39]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[40]  W. Levelt,et al.  Pupillary dilation as a measure of attention: a quantitative system analysis , 1993 .

[41]  S. Steinhauer,et al.  The Pupillary Response in Cognitive Psychophysiology and Schizophrenia a , 1992, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[42]  J. Beatty,et al.  Pupillary dilations in movement preparation and execution. , 1985, Psychophysiology.

[43]  W. Cleveland LOWESS: A Program for Smoothing Scatterplots by Robust Locally Weighted Regression , 1981 .

[44]  W. S. Peavler,et al.  Pupil size, information overload, and performance differences. , 1974, Psychophysiology.

[45]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Pupillary, heart rate, and skin resistance changes during a mental task. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[46]  D Kahneman,et al.  Pupil Diameter and Load on Memory , 1966, Science.

[47]  W. Kirchner Age differences in short-term retention of rapidly changing information. , 1958, Journal of experimental psychology.

[48]  M. Mair The Problem of the State , 2022 .