Magnetoaerodynamic Actuator for Hypersonic Flow Control

The classic pressure interaction over a sharp leading edge is a unique feature of hypersonic flow in which the boundary layer interacts strongly with the oncoming stream. The present magnetoaerodynamic actuator is based on the fact that the plasma ignited on a surface can modify the boundary-layer displacement thickness. This electromagnetic perturbation to the flowfield is further amplified by the hypersonic viscous-inviscid interaction to produce a high-surface-pressure plateau on a microsecond scale. The induced surface pressure is an effective hypersonic flow control mechanism. In essence, the minuscule magnetoaerodynamic interaction adjacent to the solid surface is introduced as an added physical mechanism for flow control. The electromagnetic force enhanced inviscid-viscous interaction generates a greater high-pressure regime over the solid surface than that of the classic hypersonic pressure interaction. This plasma actuator is demonstrated by solving the two-dimensional magnetoaerodynamic equation including the Lorentz force and Joule heating. For plasma generated by secondary electronic emission, the well-known ionization formulation for thermal excitation is inapplicable. The drift-diffusion plasma model is adopted to describe the detailed electrodynamic structure of the glow discharge. The idea of a plasma actuator has been supported by preliminary experimental data at a Mach number of five.

[1]  D. Gaitonde,et al.  Mechanisms of plasma actuators for hypersonic flow control , 2005 .

[2]  V. I. Lagutin,et al.  Aerodynamic drag reduction by plasma and hot-gas injection , 2000 .

[3]  Iu. P. Raizer Gas Discharge Physics , 1991 .

[4]  Roger L. Kimmel,et al.  Effects of Magnetic Fields on Plasmas Generated in a Mach 5 Wind Tunnel , 2003 .

[5]  Joseph S. Shang Simulating Plasma Microwave Diagnostics , 2006, J. Sci. Comput..

[6]  A. Kuranov,et al.  The potential of MHD control for improving scramjet performance , 1999 .

[7]  B. V. Leer,et al.  Towards the Ultimate Conservative Difference Scheme , 1997 .

[8]  Sergey Surzhikov,et al.  Glow Discharge in Magnetic Field with Heating of Neutral Gas , 2003 .

[9]  Sergey B. Leonov,et al.  Effect of Electrical Discharge on Separation Processes and Shocks Position in Supersonic Airflow. , 2002 .

[10]  Sergey Surzhikov,et al.  Supersonic Internal Flows with Gas Discharge and External Magnetic Field , 2003 .

[11]  James Menart,et al.  Measurements of a Transverse DC Discharge in a Mach 5 Flow , 2003 .

[12]  Anatoly A. Maslov,et al.  Influence of a Counterflow Plasma Jet on Supersonic Blunt-Body Pressures , 2002 .

[13]  A. W. Trivelpiece,et al.  Introduction to Plasma Physics , 1976 .

[14]  Datta Gaitonde,et al.  Three-Dimensional Flow-Through Scramjet Simulation with MGD Energy-Bypass , 2003 .

[15]  Thomas C. Corke,et al.  Separation Control using Plasma Actuators - Stationary & Oscillating Airfoils , 2004 .

[16]  Joseph Shang,et al.  RECENT RESEARCH IN MAGNETO-AERODYNAMICS , 2001 .

[17]  Ronald F. Probstein,et al.  Hypersonic Flow Theory , 1959 .

[18]  B. V. Leer,et al.  Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme V. A second-order sequel to Godunov's method , 1979 .

[19]  Mikhail N. Shneider,et al.  Modeling of Interaction Between Weakly Ionized Near- Surface Plasmas and Gas Flow , 2006 .

[20]  Doyle Knight,et al.  Survey of aerodynamic flow control at high speed by energy deposition , 2003 .

[21]  S. Surzhikov,et al.  NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF SUBSONIC GAS FLOWS WITH GLOW DISCHARGE AND MAGNETIC FIELD , 2003 .

[22]  J. Shang Validation of Plasma Injection for Hypersonic Blunt-Body Drag Reduction , 2003 .