Grappling with Distributed Usability: A Cultural-Historical Examination of Documentation Genres over Four Decades

Traditional models of usability assume that usability is a quality that can be designed into a particular artifact. Yet constructivist theory implies that usability cannot be located in a single artifact; rather, it must be conceived as a quality of the entire activity in which the artifact is used. This article describes a distributed approach to usability, based on activity theory and genre theory. It then illustrates the approach with a four-decade examination of a traffic accident location and analysis system (ALAS). Using the theoretical framework of genre ecologies, the article demonstrates how usability is distributed across the many official and unofficial (ad hoc) genres employed by ALAS users.

[1]  Alekseĭ Nikolaevich Leontʹev.  Problems of the development of the mind , 1981 .

[2]  Barbara Mirel.  Analyzing Electronic Help Exchanges: An Inquiry into Instructions for Complex Tasks. , 1994 .

[3]  Clay Ian Spinuzzi,et al.  Designing for lifeworlds: genre and activity in information systems design and evaluation , 1999 .

[4]  Mark Zachry,et al.  Genre ecologies: an open-system approach to understanding and constructing documentation , 2000, AJCD.

[5]  Clay Spinuzzi,et al.  Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction , 1997 .

[6]  Michael Holquist,et al.  Art and Answerability: Early Philosophical Essays , 1990 .

[7]  Mary Elizabeth Raven,et al.  Using contextual inquiry to learn about your audiences , 1996, ASTR.

[8]  Karen Holtzblatt,et al.  Making customer-centered design work for teams , 1993, CACM.

[9]  R. Stephenson.  A and V , 1962, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[10]  Patricia Dorazio,et al.  Research in Context: Ethnographic Usability , 1997 .

[11]  Karen A. Schriver.  Dynamics in Document Design: Creating Text for Readers , 1996 .

[12]  Robert R. Johnson,et al.  User-Centered Technology: A Rhetorical Theory for Computers and Other Mundane Artifacts , 1998 .

[13]  M. Bakhtin,et al.  Speech genres and other late essays , 1986 .

[14]  Barbara Mirel,et al.  “Applied Constructivism” for User Documentation , 1998 .

[15]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  Through the Interface: A Human Activity Approach To User Interface Design , 1990 .

[16]  Janice Redish,et al.  User and task analysis for interface design , 1998 .

[17]  J. T. Hackos,et al.  Customer partnering: data gathering for complex on-line documentation , 1997 .

[18]  D. Russell.  Rethinking Genre in School and Society , 1997 .

[19]  M. Bakhtin,et al.  The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays , 1981 .

[20]  T. Brooks.  Information Ecologies: Using Technology with Heart , 1999 .

[21]  Judith Ramey,et al.  A selected bibliography: a beginner's guide to usability testing , 1989 .

[22]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Interactive expertise : studies in distributed working intelligence , 1992 .

[23]  Louis M. Gomez,et al.  Formative design evaluation of superbook , 1989, TOIS.

[24]  Clay Spinuzzi,et al.  Pseudotransactionality, Activity Theory, and Professional Writing Instruction. , 1996 .

[25]  Alexander Zahar,et al.  Shaping written knowledge: the genre and activity of the experimental article in science , 1991, Medical History.

[26]  RavenMary Elizabeth,et al.  Using contextual inquiry to learn about your audiences , 1996 .

[27]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Encountering Others: Reciprocal Openings in Participatory Design and User-Centered Design , 1996, Hum. Comput. Interact..