Assessment of the Electronic Retinal Implant Alpha AMS in Restoring Vision to Blind Patients with End-Stage Retinitis Pigmentosa

Purpose To report the initial efficacy results of the Retina Implant Alpha AMS (Retina Implant AG, Reutlingen, Germany) for partial restoration of vision in end-stage retinitis pigmentosa (RP). Design Prospective, single-arm, investigator-sponsored interventional clinical trial. Within-participant control comprising residual vision with the retinal implant switched ON versus OFF in the implanted eye. Participants The Retina Implant Alpha AMS was implanted into the worse-seeing eye of 6 participants with end-stage RP and no useful perception of light vision. Eligibility criteria included previous normal vision for ≥12 years and no significant ocular or systemic comorbidity. Methods Vision assessments were scheduled at 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postimplantation. They comprised tabletop object recognition tasks, a self-assessment mobility questionnaire, and screen-based tests including Basic Light and Motion (BaLM), grating acuity, and greyscale contrast discrimination. A full-field stimulus test (FST) was also performed. Main Outcome Measures Improvement in activities of daily living, recognition tasks, and assessments of light perception with the implant ON compared with OFF. Results All 6 participants underwent successful implantation. Light perception and temporal resolution with the implant ON were achieved in all participants. Light localization was achieved with the implant ON in all but 1 participant (P4) in whom the chip was not functioning optimally because of a combination of iatrogenic intraoperative implant damage and incorrect implantation. Implant ON correct grating detections (which were at chance level with implant OFF) were recorded in the other 5 participants, ranging from 0.1 to 3.33 cycles/degree on 1 occasion. The ability to locate high-contrast tabletop objects not seen with the implant OFF was partially restored with the implant ON in all but 1 participant (P4). There were 2 incidents of conjunctival erosion and 1 inferotemporal macula-on retinal detachment, which were successfully repaired, and 2 incidents of inadvertent damage to the implant during surgery (P3 and P4). Conclusions The Alpha AMS subretinal implant improved visual performance in 5 of 6 participants and has exhibited ongoing function for up to 24 months. Although implantation surgery remains challenging, new developments such as OCT microscope guidance added refinements to the surgical technique.

[1]  Michael Bach,et al.  Basic quantitative assessment of visual performance in patients with very low vision. , 2010, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[2]  Kathleen A. Marshall,et al.  Safety and efficacy of gene transfer for Leber's congenital amaurosis. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  L. Ayton,et al.  Developing an instrumental activities of daily living tool as part of the low vision assessment of daily activities protocol. , 2014, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[4]  Eberhart Zrenner,et al.  Transcorneal Electrical Stimulation for Patients With Retinitis Pigmentosa: A Prospective, Randomized, Sham-Controlled Follow-up Study Over 1 Year. , 2017, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[5]  Mark S Humayun,et al.  Predicting visual sensitivity in retinal prosthesis patients. , 2009, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[6]  Justis P. Ehlers,et al.  Intraoperative OCT Imaging of the Argus II Retinal Prosthesis System. , 2016, Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina.

[7]  Gerald Liew,et al.  A comparison of the causes of blindness certifications in England and Wales in working age adults (16–64 years), 1999–2000 with 2009–2010 , 2014, BMJ Open.

[8]  W. Hauswirth,et al.  Treatment of leber congenital amaurosis due to RPE65 mutations by ocular subretinal injection of adeno-associated virus gene vector: short-term results of a phase I trial. , 2008, Human gene therapy.

[9]  Udo Greppmaier,et al.  Laboratory and clinical reliability of conformally coated subretinal implants , 2017, Biomedical microdevices.

[10]  Eberhart Zrenner,et al.  Phosphenes electrically evoked with DTL electrodes: a study in patients with retinitis pigmentosa, glaucoma, and homonymous visual field loss and normal subjects. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[11]  Gislin Dagnelie,et al.  Performance of real‐world functional vision tasks by blind subjects improves after implantation with the Argus® II retinal prosthesis system , 2016, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.

[12]  Angelika Braun,et al.  Artificial vision with wirelessly powered subretinal electronic implant alpha-IMS , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  R. Massof,et al.  Perceived visual ability for independent mobility in persons with retinitis pigmentosa. , 1999, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[14]  Jessy D. Dorn,et al.  Improvements in vision‐related quality of life in blind patients implanted with the Argus II Epiretinal Prosthesis , 2016, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[15]  E. Zrenner Will Retinal Implants Restore Vision ? , 2002 .

[16]  Nick Tyler,et al.  Effect of gene therapy on visual function in Leber's congenital amaurosis. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  W. Hauswirth,et al.  Treatment of retinitis pigmentosa due to MERTK mutations by ocular subretinal injection of adeno-associated virus gene vector: results of a phase I trial , 2016, Human Genetics.

[18]  A. Messias,et al.  Psychophysically determined full-field stimulus thresholds (FST) in retinitis pigmentosa: relationships with electroretinography and visual field outcomes , 2012, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[19]  Jessy D. Dorn,et al.  Interim results from the international trial of Second Sight's visual prosthesis. , 2012, Ophthalmology.

[20]  B. Wilhelm,et al.  Subretinal Visual Implant Alpha IMS – Clinical trial interim report , 2015, Vision Research.

[21]  Eberhart Zrenner,et al.  Fighting Blindness with Microelectronics , 2013, Science Translational Medicine.

[22]  J. Keeffe,et al.  Developing the impact of Vision Impairment-Very Low Vision (IVI-VLV) questionnaire as part of the LoVADA protocol. , 2014, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[23]  Hans E. Grossniklaus,et al.  Will retinal implants restore vision?Zrenner E.∗ ∗Department of Pathophysiology of Vision and Neuro-Ophthalmology, University Eye Hospital Tübingen, Shleichstr 12, D-72076, Tübingen, Germany. Science 2002;295:1022–1025. , 2002 .

[24]  J. J. McAnany,et al.  PSYCHOPHYSICAL MEASUREMENT OF ROD AND CONE THRESHOLDS IN STARGARDT DISEASE WITH FULL-FIELD STIMULI , 2013, Retina.

[25]  B. Jones,et al.  Retinal remodeling in human retinitis pigmentosa. , 2016, Experimental eye research.

[26]  Albrecht Rothermel,et al.  A CMOS Chip With Active Pixel Array and Specific Test Features for Subretinal Implantation , 2009, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits.

[27]  Alfred Stett,et al.  Subretinal electronic chips allow blind patients to read letters and combine them to words , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[28]  Gislin Dagnelie,et al.  Five-Year Safety and Performance Results from the Argus II Retinal Prosthesis System Clinical Trial. , 2016, Ophthalmology.

[29]  J. Sahel,et al.  Argus II retinal prosthesis implantation with scleral flap and autogenous temporalis fascia as alternative patch graft material: a 4-year follow-up , 2016, Clinical ophthalmology.

[30]  A. Stahl,et al.  Visual Acuity after Retinal Gene Therapy for Choroideremia , 2016 .