Artificial cognitive control with self-x capabilities: A case study of a micro-manufacturing process

This computational architecture is inspired and fed by recent progress in neuroscience.The design and implementation of self-learning and self-optimization capabilities.The implementation in a low-cost computational platform to facilitate technology transfer in industry. Nowadays, even though cognitive control architectures form an important area of research, there are many constraints on the broad application of cognitive control at an industrial level and very few systematic approaches truly inspired by biological processes, from the perspective of control engineering. Thus, our main purpose here is the emulation of human socio-cognitive skills, so as to approach control engineering problems in an effective way at an industrial level. The artificial cognitive control architecture that we propose, based on the shared circuits model of socio-cognitive skills, seeks to overcome limitations from the perspectives of computer science, neuroscience and systems engineering. The design and implementation of artificial cognitive control architecture is focused on four key areas: (i) self-optimization and self-leaning capabilities by estimation of distribution and reinforcement-learning mechanisms; (ii) portability and scalability based on low-cost computing platforms; (iii) connectivity based on middleware; and (iv) model-driven approaches. The results of simulation and real-time application to force control of micro-manufacturing processes are presented as a proof of concept. The proof of concept of force control yields good transient responses, short settling times and acceptable steady-state error. The artificial cognitive control architecture built into a low-cost computing platform demonstrates the suitability of its implementation in an industrial setup.

[1]  Stefano Borgo,et al.  An ontological approach for reliable data integration in the industrial domain , 2014, Comput. Ind..

[2]  M. Eftekhari,et al.  A New Fuzzy and Correlation Based Feature Selection Method for Multiclass Problems , 2014 .

[3]  Peter Ford Dominey,et al.  Robot Cognitive Control with a Neurophysiologically Inspired Reinforcement Learning Model , 2011, Front. Neurorobot..

[4]  Sisir Roy,et al.  The ‘prediction imperative’ as the basis for self-awareness , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  Qing Li,et al.  Unified Modeling Language , 2009 .

[6]  Pierre-Yves Glorennec,et al.  Tuning fuzzy PD and PI controllers using reinforcement learning. , 2010, ISA transactions.

[7]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Cognitive Control , 2012, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[8]  John G. Taylor,et al.  A Cognitive Control Architecture for the Perception–Action Cycle in Robots and Agents , 2013, Cognitive Computation.

[9]  C.J.M. Heemskerk,et al.  Evaluating ITER Remote Handling middleware concepts , 2013 .

[10]  Paul F. M. J. Verschure,et al.  PASAR: An integrated model of prediction, anticipation, sensation, attention and response for artificial sensorimotor systems , 2012, Inf. Sci..

[11]  Sonja Stork,et al.  Artificial Cognition in Production Systems , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[12]  A. Sánchez Boza,et al.  A FIRST APPROACH TO AN ARTIFICIAL NETWORKED COGNITIVE CONTROL SYSTEM BASED ON THE SHARED CIRCUITS MODEL OF SOCIOCOGNITIVE CAPACITIES , 2011 .

[13]  Dietmar Dietrich,et al.  Cognitive Automation—Survey of Novel Artificial General Intelligence Methods for the Automation of Human Technical Environments , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[14]  Xi Zhang,et al.  Accounting for a variety of reasoning data within a cognitive architecture , 2006, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell..

[15]  Stefan Preitl,et al.  Adaptive GSA-Based Optimal Tuning of PI Controlled Servo Systems With Reduced Process Parametric Sensitivity, Robust Stability and Controller Robustness , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics.

[16]  Yujia Wang,et al.  Particle swarm optimization with preference order ranking for multi-objective optimization , 2009, Inf. Sci..

[17]  Rodolfo E. Haber,et al.  Optimal fuzzy control system using the cross-entropy method. A case study of a drilling process , 2010, Inf. Sci..

[18]  Plamen P. Angelov,et al.  PANFIS: A Novel Incremental Learning Machine , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems.

[19]  Lothar Thiele,et al.  Comparison of Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms: Empirical Results , 2000, Evolutionary Computation.

[20]  James S. Albus,et al.  Toward a Computational Theory of Mind , 2006 .

[21]  Indrajit Mukherjee,et al.  A review of optimization techniques in metal cutting processes , 2006, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[22]  Giulio Sandini,et al.  A Survey of Artificial Cognitive Systems: Implications for the Autonomous Development of Mental Capabilities in Computational Agents , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[23]  Pat Langley,et al.  Cognitive architectures: Research issues and challenges , 2009, Cognitive Systems Research.

[24]  Xin Yao,et al.  Analysis of Computational Time of Simple Estimation of Distribution Algorithms , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[25]  Andrew W. Moore,et al.  Reinforcement Learning: A Survey , 1996, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[26]  Radu-Emil Precup,et al.  An overview on fault diagnosis and nature-inspired optimal control of industrial process applications , 2015, Comput. Ind..

[27]  Kinam Park,et al.  Design and Implementation of Knowledge Sharing System using Smart Devices , 2015 .

[28]  John R Anderson,et al.  An integrated theory of the mind. , 2004, Psychological review.

[29]  Csaba Szepesvári,et al.  Algorithms for Reinforcement Learning , 2010, Synthesis Lectures on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning.

[30]  R. Rubinstein A Stochastic Minimum Cross-Entropy Method for Combinatorial Optimization and Rare-event Estimation* , 2005 .

[31]  Pat Langley,et al.  Cognitive Architectures and General Intelligent Systems , 2006, AI Mag..

[32]  John B. Shoven,et al.  I , Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal.

[33]  Masao Ito Control of mental activities by internal models in the cerebellum , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[34]  Anne-Françoise Cutting-Decelle,et al.  A model-driven ontology approach for manufacturing system interoperability and knowledge sharing , 2013, Comput. Ind..

[35]  Oscar Javier,et al.  Self-Organized and Evolvable Cognitive Architecture for Intelligent Agents and Multi-agent Systems , 2010, 2010 Second International Conference on Computer Engineering and Applications.

[36]  Dmitry Kit,et al.  A hierarchical modular architecture for embodied cognition. , 2013, Multisensory research.

[37]  S. Hurley The shared circuits model (SCM): how control, mirroring, and simulation can enable imitation, deliberation, and mindreading. , 2008, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[38]  Gerardo Beruvides,et al.  Correlation of the holes quality with the force signals in a microdrilling process of a sintered tungsten-copper alloy , 2014 .

[39]  Jyh-Shing Roger Jang,et al.  ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system , 1993, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[40]  M. Kawato,et al.  Brain mechanisms for predictive control by switching internal models: implications for higher-order cognitive functions , 2009, Psychological research.

[41]  Takaki Makino Failure, instead of inhibition, should be monitored for the distinction of self/other and actual/possible actions , 2008 .

[42]  E. Petriu,et al.  Fuzzy logic-based adaptive gravitational search algorithm for optimal tuning of fuzzy-controlled servo systems , 2013 .

[43]  Ron Sun,et al.  From implicit skills to explicit knowledge: a bottom-up model of skill learning , 2001, Cogn. Sci..

[44]  Jill Fain Lehman,et al.  A Gentle Introduction to Soar, an Architecture for Human Cognition. , 1996 .

[45]  Sunan Wang,et al.  Self-organizing genetic algorithm based tuning of PID controllers , 2009, Inf. Sci..

[46]  A. Newell Unified Theories of Cognition , 1990 .

[47]  Tamas Madl,et al.  LIDA: A Systems-level Architecture for Cognition, Emotion, and Learning , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development.

[48]  David J. Israel,et al.  Plans and resource‐bounded practical reasoning , 1988, Comput. Intell..

[49]  R. Huerta,et al.  A Computational Framework for Understanding Decision Making through Integration of Basic Learning Rules , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[50]  Radu-Emil Precup,et al.  A survey on industrial applications of fuzzy control , 2011, Comput. Ind..

[51]  Reuven Y. Rubinstein,et al.  Semi-Iterative Minimum Cross-Entropy Algorithms for Rare-Events, Counting, Combinatorial and Integer Programming , 2008 .

[52]  Douglas C. Schmidt,et al.  The design of the TAO real-time object request broker , 1998, Comput. Commun..

[53]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Cognitive Control: Theory and Application , 2014, IEEE Access.

[54]  Charlie Lewis,et al.  Mirroring cannot account for understanding action , 2008 .

[55]  George L. Kovács,et al.  Some aspects of dynamic 3D representation and control of industrial processes via the Internet , 2013, Comput. Ind..

[56]  Agustín Gajate,et al.  Artificial cognitive control system based on the shared circuits model of sociocognitive capacities. A first approach , 2011, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[57]  Pablo Varona,et al.  Neural Dynamics of Attentional Cross-Modality Control , 2013, PloS one.

[58]  R. Lyndon While,et al.  A review of multiobjective test problems and a scalable test problem toolkit , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.