Movement Improves the Quality of Temporal Perception and Decision-Making

Recent evidence suggest that our experience of time is directly and intrinsically computed within the motor system. Accordingly, a variety of studies have demonstrated that concurrent movement impacts the estimate of temporal duration, such that perceived time is shifted towards the duration of movement. In order to investigate the role of the motor system, we tested human subjects (n=40) on a novel task combining reaching and time perception. In this task, subjects were required to move a robotic manipulandum to one of two physical locations to categorize a concurrently timed suprasecond auditory stimulus as “long” or “short”, relative to a running average criterion. Critically, subjects were divided into two groups: one in which movement during the interval was unrestricted and subjects could move freely to their choice, and one in which they were restrained from moving until the stimulus interval had elapsed. Our results revealed a higher degree of precision for subjects in the free-moving group. By further decomposing choice and response time data with a drift diffusion model of decision making, we identified the source of this change to a shift in the response threshold for free-moving subjects. Analysis of movement parameters revealed that eventual choice could be determined by movement parameters (e.g. trajectory, force) before the response was made, and even before the interval had elapsed, and that the variability of these movements was lower in the unrestrained group. A further experiment (n=14) verified that these findings were not due to proximity to the target, counting strategies, bias, or movement length. Our findings suggest that perceptual timing may be instantiated within the motor system as an ongoing readout of timing judgment and confidence.

[1]  A. Haith,et al.  Independence of Movement Preparation and Movement Initiation , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  Kielan Yarrow,et al.  How the motor system both encodes and influences our sense of time , 2016, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences.

[3]  Ellen Poliakoff,et al.  Good vibrations: Human interval timing in the vibrotactile modality , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  Luc H. Arnal,et al.  Delta-Beta Coupled Oscillations Underlie Temporal Prediction Accuracy. , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[5]  H. Zelaznik,et al.  Dissociation of explicit and implicit timing in repetitive tapping and drawing movements. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  Thomas V. Wiecki,et al.  Subthalamic nucleus stimulation reverses mediofrontal influence over decision threshold , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[7]  J. Tipples Caution Follows Fear: Evidence From Hierarchical Drift Diffusion Modelling , 2017, Emotion.

[8]  Jörn Diedrichsen,et al.  Perceptual decisions are biased by the cost to act , 2017, eLife.

[9]  G. Sandini,et al.  Motor Commands Induce Time Compression for Tactile Stimuli , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  Karl M Newell,et al.  The movement speed-accuracy relation in space-time. , 2013, Human movement science.

[11]  Marcelo Gomes Mattar,et al.  de Bruijn cycles for neural decoding , 2011, NeuroImage.

[12]  Satu Palva,et al.  The role of cortical beta oscillations in time estimation , 2016, Human brain mapping.

[13]  E. Todorov Optimality principles in sensorimotor control , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  A. Voss,et al.  Interpreting the parameters of the diffusion model: An empirical validation , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[15]  Michael S Landy,et al.  Motor control is decision-making , 2012, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[16]  Brandie M. Stewart,et al.  Rapid Automatic Motor Encoding of Competing Reach Options. , 2017, Cell reports.

[17]  Thomas V. Wiecki,et al.  HDDM: Hierarchical Bayesian estimation of the Drift-Diffusion Model in Python , 2013, Front. Neuroinform..

[18]  Masami Ishihara,et al.  Horizontal spatial representations of time: Evidence for the STEARC effect , 2008, Cortex.

[19]  Martin Wiener,et al.  An Intrinsic Role of Beta Oscillations in Memory for Time Estimation , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[20]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Error correction, sensory prediction, and adaptation in motor control. , 2010, Annual review of neuroscience.

[21]  C. Spence,et al.  Audiotactile interactions in temporal perception , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[22]  A. Heathcote,et al.  Distinguishing the time- and magnitude-difference accounts of the Simon effect: Evidence from the reach-to-touch paradigm , 2015, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[23]  H. Coslett,et al.  Continuous Carryover of Temporal Context Dissociates Response Bias from Perceptual Influence for Duration , 2014, PloS one.

[24]  R Plamondon,et al.  Speed/accuracy trade-offs in target-directed movements , 1997, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[25]  Martin Verner,et al.  Larger visual stimuli are perceived to last longer from time to time: The internal clock is not affected by nontemporal visual stimulus size. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[26]  Warren H. Meck,et al.  Contingent negative variation and its relation to time estimation: a theoretical evaluation , 2011, Front. Integr. Neurosci..

[27]  Gary C. Sing,et al.  Primitives for Motor Adaptation Reflect Correlated Neural Tuning to Position and Velocity , 2009, Neuron.

[28]  G. Sandini,et al.  Active movement restores veridical event-timing after tactile adaptation. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  Richard B Ivry,et al.  Temporal Control and Coordination: The Multiple Timer Model , 2002, Brain and Cognition.

[30]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Principles of sensorimotor learning , 2011, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[31]  M. Morrone,et al.  Perceived visual time depends on motor preparation and direction of hand movements , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[32]  Tomas Knapen,et al.  Interregional alpha-band synchrony supports temporal cross-modal integration , 2014, NeuroImage.

[33]  J. Kalaska,et al.  Comparison of variability of initial kinematics and endpoints of reaching movements , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[34]  H. Zelaznik,et al.  Correlations for timing consistency among tapping and drawing tasks: evidence against a single timing process for motor control. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  R. Ivry,et al.  Time on Your Hands: Perceived Duration of Sensory Events Is Biased Toward Concurrent Actions , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[36]  B. Burle,et al.  Action Monitoring and Medial Frontal Cortex: Leading Role of Supplementary Motor Area , 2014, Science.

[37]  Ryota Kanai,et al.  Ready steady slow: action preparation slows the subjective passage of time , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[38]  D. Burr,et al.  Optimal Encoding of Interval Timing in Expert Percussionists , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  Sylvain Baillet,et al.  Motor origin of temporal predictions in auditory attention , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  Stephen M. Rao,et al.  “One-thousandone … one-thousandtwo …”: Chronometric counting violates the scalar property in interval timing , 2004, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[41]  S. Nishida,et al.  Apparent Time Interval of Visual Stimuli Is Compressed during Fast Hand Movement , 2015, PloS one.

[42]  Maria C. Dadarlat,et al.  Locomotion Enhances Neural Encoding of Visual Stimuli in Mouse V1 , 2017, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[43]  Thomas A. Farmer,et al.  Hand in Motion Reveals Mind in Motion , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[44]  G. Sandini,et al.  Rhythmic Oscillations of Visual Contrast Sensitivity Synchronized with Action , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[45]  M. García-Pérez Does time ever fly or slow down? The difficult interpretation of psychophysical data on time perception , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[46]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: Approaches to dealing with contaminant reaction times and parameter variability , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[47]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Relevance of error: what drives motor adaptation? , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[48]  Michael N. Shadlen,et al.  Temporal context calibrates interval timing , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[49]  J. Kalaska,et al.  Neural mechanisms for interacting with a world full of action choices. , 2010, Annual review of neuroscience.

[50]  Ryota Kanai,et al.  Frequency tuning for temporal perception and prediction , 2016, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences.

[51]  Scott W. Brown Attentional resources in timing: Interference effects in concurrent temporal and nontemporal working memory tasks , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[52]  Md. Shoaibur Rahman,et al.  Selective Attention Gates the Interactive Crossmodal Coupling between Perceptual Systems , 2017, Current Biology.

[53]  Hugo Merchant,et al.  Linking Perception, Cognition, and Action: Psychophysical Observations and Neural Network Modelling , 2014, PloS one.

[54]  H. Mannila,et al.  Computing Discrete Fréchet Distance ∗ , 1994 .

[55]  Bingni W. Brunton,et al.  Rats and Humans Can Optimally Accumulate Evidence for Decision-Making , 2013, Science.

[56]  John W Krakauer,et al.  A motor planning stage represents the shape of upcoming movement trajectories. , 2016, Journal of neurophysiology.

[57]  Franck Vidal,et al.  When to act, or not to act: that's the SMA's question , 2016, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences.

[58]  Tomohisa Asai,et al.  My action lasts longer: Potential link between subjective time and agency during voluntary action , 2017, Consciousness and Cognition.

[59]  Michael Schutz,et al.  “Moving to the beat” improves timing perception , 2013, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[60]  Helmut Alt,et al.  Computing the Fréchet distance between two polygonal curves , 1995, Int. J. Comput. Geom. Appl..

[61]  D. Wolpert,et al.  A common mechanism underlies changes of mind about decisions and confidence , 2015, eLife.

[62]  Ramon Bartolo,et al.  The Context of Temporal Processing Is Represented in the Multidimensional Relationships between Timing Tasks , 2008, PloS one.

[63]  Martin Wiener,et al.  Repetition enhancement and memory effects for duration , 2015, NeuroImage.

[64]  Alexandre Gramfort,et al.  The Strength of Alpha–Beta Oscillatory Coupling Predicts Motor Timing Precision , 2019, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[65]  R. Ivry,et al.  Moving Time: The Influence of Action on Duration Perception , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[66]  Jessica A. Cardin,et al.  Sensation during Active Behaviors , 2017, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[67]  E. Maris,et al.  Theta oscillations locked to intended actions rhythmically modulate perception , 2017, eLife.

[68]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Changing your mind: a computational mechanism of vacillation , 2009, Nature.

[69]  Giovanni Pezzulo,et al.  Unfolding Visual Lexical Decision in Time , 2012, PloS one.

[70]  Wilsaan M. Joiner,et al.  The decay of motor adaptation to novel movement dynamics reveals an asymmetry in the stability of motion state-dependent learning , 2017, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[71]  Felix Wichmann,et al.  The psychometric function: II. Bootstrap-based confidence intervals and sampling , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[72]  Ingo Fründ,et al.  Inference for psychometric functions in the presence of nonstationary behavior. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[73]  Anne-Claire Rattat,et al.  What is the best and easiest method of preventing counting in different temporal tasks? , 2012, Behavior research methods.

[74]  C. Kennard,et al.  Functional role of the supplementary and pre-supplementary motor areas , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[75]  Derek H. Arnold,et al.  Weighted Integration Suggests That Visual and Tactile Signals Provide Independent Estimates About Duration , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[76]  R. VanRullen,et al.  Spontaneous EEG oscillations reveal periodic sampling of visual attention , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[77]  Hugo Merchant,et al.  Neural basis for categorical boundaries in the primate pre-SMA during relative categorization of time intervals , 2018, Nature Communications.

[78]  J. Tanji,et al.  Interval time coding by neurons in the presupplementary and supplementary motor areas , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.