A Threat Assessment Model under Uncertain Environment

Threat evaluation is extremely important to decision makers in many situations, such as military application and physical protection systems. In this paper, a new threat assessment model based on interval number to deal with the intrinsic uncertainty and imprecision in combat environment is proposed. Both objective and subjective factors are taken into consideration in the proposed model. For the objective factors, the genetic algorithm (GA) is used to search out an optimal interval number representing all the attribute values of each object. In addition, for the subjective factors, the interval Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is adopted to determine each object’s threat weight according to the experience of commanders/experts. Then a discounting method is proposed to integrate the objective and subjective factors. At last, the ideal of Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) is applied to obtain the threat ranking of all the objects. A real application is used to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed model.

[1]  Tapan Kumar Pal,et al.  On comparing interval numbers , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[2]  Yuh-Yuan Guh,et al.  Fuzzy multiple attributes and multiple hierarchical decision making , 1996 .

[3]  Mikael Hildén,et al.  The significance of information frameworks in integrated risk assessment and management , 2008 .

[4]  Hu-Chen Liu,et al.  A novel approach for failure mode and effects analysis using combination weighting and fuzzy VIKOR method , 2015, Appl. Soft Comput..

[5]  Carlo Bertoluzza,et al.  On a new class of distances between fuzzy numbers , 1995 .

[6]  Basim Al-Najjar,et al.  Selecting the most efficient maintenance approach using fuzzy multiple criteria decision making , 2003 .

[7]  Sai Ho Chung,et al.  An adaptive genetic algorithm with dominated genes for distributed scheduling problems , 2005, Expert Syst. Appl..

[8]  Yong Deng,et al.  Using the Fuzzy DEMATEL to Determine Environmental Performance: A Case of Printed Circuit Board Industry in Taiwan , 2015, PloS one.

[9]  Phil Diamond,et al.  Fuzzy least squares , 1988, Inf. Sci..

[10]  P. Diamond,et al.  Extended fuzzy linear models and least squares estimates , 1997 .

[11]  Sang-Bing Tsai,et al.  Establishing a criteria system for green production , 2015 .

[12]  T. Saaty How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1990 .

[13]  Ibrahim M. Khadam,et al.  Multi-criteria decision analysis with probabilistic risk assessment for the management of contaminated ground water , 2003 .

[14]  Navee Chiadamrong An integrated fuzzy multi-criteria decision making method for manufacturing strategies , 1999 .

[15]  Hu-Chen Liu,et al.  Failure mode and effects analysis using D numbers and grey relational projection method , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[16]  Yanni Wang,et al.  The Evidential Reasoning Approach to Medical Diagnosis using Intuitionistic Fuzzy Dempster-Shafer Theory , 2015, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst..

[17]  Yu Luo,et al.  Determining Basic Probability Assignment Based on the Improved Similarity Measures of Generalized Fuzzy Numbers , 2015, Int. J. Comput. Commun. Control.

[18]  Yao Zhang,et al.  A method based on stochastic dominance degrees for stochastic multiple criteria decision making , 2010, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[19]  Tania Stathaki,et al.  A rule-based classification methodology to handle uncertainty in habitat mapping employing evidential reasoning and fuzzy logic , 2014, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[20]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  The Modern Science of Multicriteria Decision Making and Its Practical Applications: The AHP/ANP Approach , 2013, Oper. Res..

[21]  Dirk van Aken,et al.  Considerations in developing complete and quantified methods for risk assessment , 2008 .

[22]  Yong Deng,et al.  Modeling contaminant intrusion in water distribution networks: A new similarity-based DST method , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[23]  G E Apostolakis,et al.  Application of risk assessment and decision analysis to the evaluation, ranking and selection of environmental remediation alternatives. , 2000, Journal of hazardous materials.

[24]  Witold Pedrycz,et al.  Risk evaluation through decision-support architectures in threat assessment and countering terrorism , 2011, Appl. Soft Comput..

[25]  Khalil Kimiafar,et al.  Prioritizing Factors Influencing Nurses’ Satisfaction With Hospital Information Systems: A Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach , 2014, Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN.

[26]  Cengiz Kahraman,et al.  Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision-Making: A Literature Review , 2015, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst..

[27]  Hu-Chen Liu,et al.  Fuzzy Failure Mode and Effects Analysis Using Fuzzy Evidential Reasoning and Belief Rule-Based Methodology , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[28]  Hwong-Wen Ma,et al.  Combining the cost of reducing uncertainty with the selection of risk assessment models for remediation decision of site contamination. , 2007, Journal of hazardous materials.

[29]  Lily R. Liang,et al.  Cognitive situation and threat assessments of ground battlespaces , 2003, Inf. Fusion.

[30]  Solomon Tesfamariam,et al.  Risk analysis in a linguistic environment: A fuzzy evidential reasoning-based approach , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[31]  Yu Luo,et al.  An improved method to rank generalized fuzzy numbers with different left heights and right heights , 2015, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[32]  KwanSeong Jeong,et al.  Risk assessment on hazards for decommissioning safety of a nuclear facility , 2010 .

[33]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Dynamic risk assessment using failure assessment and Bayesian theory , 2009 .

[34]  Yong Deng,et al.  Generalized evidence theory , 2014, Applied Intelligence.

[35]  Dianne Hall,et al.  Engaging multiple perspectives: A value-based decision-making model , 2007, Decis. Support Syst..

[36]  Bo Feng,et al.  A method for stochastic multiple criteria decision making based on pairwise comparisons of alternatives with random evaluations , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[37]  Ramon E. Moore Interval arithmetic and automatic error analysis in digital computing , 1963 .

[38]  Manoj Kumar Tiwari,et al.  Global supplier selection: a fuzzy-AHP approach , 2008 .

[39]  Xinyang Deng,et al.  Supplier selection using AHP methodology extended by D numbers , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[40]  Witold Pedrycz,et al.  International Journal of Approximate Reasoning Triangular Fuzzy Decision-theoretic Rough Sets , 2022 .

[41]  Anne-Françoise Rutkowski,et al.  A fuzzy decision support system for IT Service Continuity threat assessment , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[42]  Rajiv Kohli,et al.  A multiple criteria assessment of decision technology system journal quality , 2001, Inf. Manag..

[43]  S. Mahadevan,et al.  Dependence Assessment in Human Reliability Analysis Using Evidence Theory and AHP , 2015, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[44]  Sankaran Mahadevan,et al.  Vulnerability Assessment of Physical Protection Systems: A Bio-Inspired Approach , 2015, Int. J. Unconv. Comput..

[45]  M. Sayadi,et al.  Extension of VIKOR method for decision making problem with interval numbers , 2009 .

[46]  Xu Han,et al.  An uncertain structural optimization method based on nonlinear interval number programming and interval analysis method , 2007 .

[47]  Chao Fu,et al.  Robust evidential reasoning approach with unknown attribute weights , 2014, Knowl. Based Syst..

[48]  Wang Jian-qiang,et al.  Multi-criteria decision-making approach with incomplete certain information based on ternary AHP , 2006 .

[49]  Lucien Duckstein,et al.  Comparison of fuzzy numbers using a fuzzy distance measure , 2002, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[50]  Zhongliang Yue,et al.  An extended TOPSIS for determining weights of decision makers with interval numbers , 2011, Knowl. Based Syst..

[51]  Sankaran Mahadevan,et al.  Evidential cognitive maps , 2012, Knowl. Based Syst..