Improving construction site management practices through knowledge management

There are several challenging engineering and management problems that occur on construction sites. Failure in managing construction site problems results in a high proportion of rework, defects, delays, disputes and cost overruns on construction projects. In site management, knowledge is often embedded not only in documents and repositories but also in organisational routines, processes, practices and norms. However, site management teams still do not have a systematic approach to managing knowledge. Knowledge management (KM) processes can effectively be used to enable construction site managers deal with on-site problems and risks in a systematic and efficient way. With regard to these problems, the aim of this research was to investigate the improvement of construction site management practices through the integration of knowledge management processes. The research methodology adopted consisted of several methods. A literature review on site management practices and knowledge management as first undertaken . This was followed by case studies involving five construction sites which sought to investigate the key problems of site management practices and to examine existing knowledge management practices on the construction site. They also explored how KM processes could improve current site management practices. The cases tudy findings underpinned by literature results were used to develop a conceptual framework to managing construction knowledge that is entrenched in site management processes. The integrated K&4 framework (incorporating both proactive and reactive approaches) was intended to enable site managers to adopt a knowledge management approach to addressing site management problems. The framework was encapsulated in a computer-based prototype system (developed using Microsoft Visual Basic) to simplify the use of the integrated KM framework and provide construction organisations with a practical tool. Evaluation of the prototype system was carried out by industry practitioners and construction researchers to assess its appropriateness and functionality. It was established that the prototype system was highly effective in enabling site managers to address site management problems from a knowledge management perspective. Several benefits of the system were also identified. It is concluded that construction site management practices can be improved if the knowledge dimensions of the problems are well understood and appropriately managed. This research has developed an integrated KM framework that provides a structured approach to achieving this. The framework is simple to use, requires a relatively short time to implement, is scalable to any type of project and can easily be deployed on any construction site. Knowledge gains economic value when it is used to solve problems, explore opportunities and make decisions. The developed prototype system is expected to increase the ability of the site manager to learn from previous experience and to better address any site management problems that may occur. It also enables the site manager to be proactive in minimising the number of problems that occur on the construction site and to reduce the impact of those that do occur.

[1]  Derek W. Seward,et al.  Issues in the development of data flow simulation of construction sites: the pursuit of quality. , 1995 .

[2]  Paul Beynon-Davies,et al.  Information systems evaluation and the information systems development process , 2004, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[3]  Michael F. Smith Software Prototyping: Adoption, Practice and Management , 1991 .

[4]  Mark J. Clayton,et al.  Dynamic Knowledge Map: Reusing Experts’ Tacit Knowledge in the AEC Industry , 2004, ACADIA proceedings.

[5]  Ghassan Aouad,et al.  Rethinking construction: the Generic Design and Construction Process Protocol , 2000 .

[6]  Shu-Hsien Liao,et al.  Problem solving and knowledge inertia , 2002, Expert Syst. Appl..

[7]  Amm Liu,et al.  Research Methods for Construction (3rd ed.) , 2008 .

[8]  Elizabeth Barnett,et al.  Knowledge management initiatives: learning from failure , 2000, J. Knowl. Manag..

[9]  Kenneth F. Hyde Recognising deductive processes in qualitative research , 2000 .

[10]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Triangulation in construction management research , 2002 .

[11]  Khaleel Malik Knowledge management: an integrated approach (Book Review) , 2007 .

[12]  Mike Bresnen,et al.  Understanding the diffusion and application of new management ideas in construction , 2001 .

[13]  J. Creswell Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. , 1998 .

[14]  Sumantra Ghoshal,et al.  Beyond best practice , 2005 .

[15]  Wf Wim Schaefer,et al.  Instruments for the management of knowledge , 1993 .

[16]  Charles H. Bixler,et al.  Chapter 3 – Developing a Foundation for a Successful Knowledge Management System , 2005 .

[17]  F. Caeldries Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution , 1994 .

[18]  Ramdane Djebarni,et al.  The impact of stress in site management effectiveness , 1996 .

[19]  Lakshmi S. Iyer,et al.  Knowledge warehouse: an architectural integration of knowledge management, decision support, artificial intelligence and data warehousing , 2002, Decis. Support Syst..

[20]  Tony Sheehan,et al.  Strategies and Business Case for Knowledge Management , 2008 .

[21]  Steve Smithson,et al.  Information systems evaluation: myth and reality , 1987 .

[22]  D. M. Hutton,et al.  The Essence of Human Computer Interaction , 2000 .

[23]  B. Gallupe,et al.  Knowledge management systems: surveying the landscape , 2001 .

[24]  S. Renukappa,et al.  Knowledge management for sustainable competitiveness in small and medium surveying practices , 2005 .

[25]  Caroline Stenbacka Qualitative research requires quality concepts of its own , 2001 .

[26]  L. A. Clark,et al.  Obstacles to implementing total quality management in the UK construction industry , 1998 .

[27]  Shamil Naoum,et al.  Factors influencing the effectiveness of construction site managers , 1998 .

[28]  Marjan Sarshar,et al.  Evolution of management theory: the case of production management in construction , 2002 .

[29]  Stanley Goldhaber,et al.  Construction management: Principles and practices , 1977 .

[30]  Andrew D.F. Price,et al.  Planning future construction skill requirements: understanding labour resource issues , 1995 .

[31]  John Bennett,et al.  International Construction Project Management: General Theory and Practice , 1991 .

[32]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Concurrent engineering : a strategy for procuring construction projects , 1998 .

[33]  Charles Egbu,et al.  Information technologies for knowledge management: their usage and effectiveness , 2002, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[34]  D. Whitehead Case Study Research Design and Methods, 3rd edition , 2003 .

[35]  Sherif Ali Mohtady Mohamed,et al.  Benchmarking and improving construction productivity , 1996 .

[36]  Terry Williams Identifying the hard lessons from projects – easily , 2004 .

[37]  Richard A. Belle BENCHMARKING AND ENHANCING BEST PRACTICES IN THE ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION SECTOR , 2000 .

[38]  Yu-Cheng Lin,et al.  Developing an activity-based knowledge management system for contractors , 2004 .

[39]  Glen Mullineux,et al.  A framework for the requirements of capturing, storing and reusing information and knowledge in engineering design , 2002, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[40]  Alexander Styhre,et al.  Revisiting site manager work: stuck in the middle? , 2006 .

[41]  Rosina O. Weber,et al.  Intelligent lessons learned systems , 2001, Expert Syst. Appl..

[42]  H L Michael,et al.  MANAGEMENT OF RESEARCH. INTRODUCTION , 1973 .

[43]  Chimay J. Anumba,et al.  Prototype system for knowledge problem definition , 2006 .

[44]  Chimay J. Anumba,et al.  Tools and Techniques for Knowledge Management , 2008 .

[45]  Georg Forster,et al.  Construction Site Studies: Production Administration and Personnel , 1989 .

[46]  Matti Vartiainen,et al.  Managing knowledge and knowledge competences in projects and project organisations , 2003 .

[47]  J. Gill,et al.  Research Methods For Managers , 1991 .

[48]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[49]  Joseph H. M. Tah,et al.  Towards a framework for project risk knowledge management in the construction supply chain , 2001 .

[50]  Robert L. Stevenson,et al.  view of research , 1993 .

[51]  Dilanthi Amaratunga,et al.  Case study methodology as a means of theory building: performance measurement in facilities management organisations , 2001 .

[52]  Ahmed M. Al-Ghassani Improving the structural design process : a knowledge management approach , 2003 .

[53]  Chimay J. Anumba,et al.  Performance evaluation of a knowledge‐based system for subsidence management , 2001 .

[54]  Charles McClintock,et al.  Applying the logic of sample surveys to qualitative case studies: The case cluster method , 1979 .

[55]  Robert D. Galliers,et al.  Research issues in information systems , 1993, J. Inf. Technol..

[56]  F. Blackler KNOWLEDGE AND THE THEORY OF ORGANIZATIONS: ORGANIZATIONS AS ACTIVITY SYSTEMS AND THE REFRAMING OF MANAGEMENT* , 1993 .

[57]  Theodore J. Trauner Managing the construction project : a practical guide for the project manager / Theodore J. Trauner , 1992 .

[58]  John Bennett Construction the Third Way, Managing Cooperation and Competition in Construction , 2000 .

[59]  B Hobbs,et al.  Development of automated communication of system for managing site information using internet technology , 2002 .

[60]  Frank Ulbrich,et al.  Improving shared service implementation: adopting lessons from the BPR movement , 2006, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[61]  Andrew Graves,et al.  Decentralised site management—a case study , 1999 .

[62]  Chimay J. Anumba,et al.  APRON: an agent‐based specification and procurement system for construction products , 2005 .

[63]  Sherif Ali Mohtady Mohamed,et al.  SAFETY CLIMATE IN CONSTRUCTION SITE ENVIRONMENTS , 2002 .

[64]  Matthew Wetherill Knowledge management for the construction industry: the e-cognos project , 2002, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[65]  Steve Rowlinson,et al.  Capturing Safety Knowledge Using Design-for-Safety-Process Tool , 2004 .

[66]  Meliha Handzic,et al.  Knowledge Management: An integrative Approach , 2005 .

[67]  Derek H.T. Walker,et al.  Project histories and project learning - a knowledge management challenge , 2004 .

[68]  Maria Limniou,et al.  How to Use Visual Basic to Interface Scientific Instruments to a Personal Computer , 2002 .

[69]  Chimay J. Anumba,et al.  Managing Knowledge in the Context of Sustainable Construction , 2006, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[70]  P. Noble,et al.  Towards an inclusive evaluation methodology , 1999 .

[71]  Sally Sieloff Magnan,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 1997 .

[72]  Paul Chinowsky,et al.  Exploiting Knowledge Management: The Engineering and Construction Perspective , 2006 .

[73]  Wayne Goddard,et al.  Research Methodology: An Introduction , 2004 .

[74]  Ganesh D. Bhatt,et al.  Knowledge management in organizations: examining the interaction between technologies, techniques, and people , 2001, J. Knowl. Manag..

[75]  Derek H.T. Walker,et al.  Choosing an appropriate research methodology , 1997 .

[76]  Keith F. Snider,et al.  Beyond the Body of Knowledge: A Knowledge-Flow Approach to Project Management Theory and Practice , 2003 .

[77]  Chimay J. Anumba,et al.  A tool for developing knowledge management strategies , 2002, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..