The Role of Explanations and Need for Uniqueness in Consumer Decision Making: Unconventional Choices Based on Reasons

This research investigates the interaction between a very common task, explaining decisions, and an individual difference, need for uniqueness (NFU), on buyer decision making. We propose that explaining (or providing reasons for) decisions shifts the focus from the choice of options to the choice of reasons. Furthermore, buyers who explain their decisions and have high NFU tend to select unconventional reasons and are, consequently, more likely to make unconventional choices. These predictions were supported in a series of studies involving choices between conventional and less‐conventional options, such as whether to switch to a brand on sale, whether to select a compromise option, and whether to accept a gamble with a possible loss. The findings also indicate that the effects of providing reasons are not due to attempts to act rationally or to concerns about being evaluated. Three boundary conditions on the generalization that high NFU consumers who provide reasons tend to make unconventional choices we...

[1]  C. R. Snyder,et al.  Product Scarcity by Need for Uniqueness Interaction: A Consumer Catch-22 Carousel? , 1992 .

[2]  C. R. Snyder,et al.  Abnormality as a positive characteristic: The development and validation of a scale measuring need for uniqueness. , 1977 .

[3]  Timothy B. Heath,et al.  Asymmetric Decoy Effects on Lower-Quality versus Higher-Quality Brands: Meta-analytic and Experimental Evidence , 1995 .

[4]  Itamar Simonson,et al.  The effect of accountability on susceptibility to decision errors , 1992 .

[5]  P. Tetlock,et al.  Social and cognitive strategies for coping with accountability: conformity, complexity, and bolstering. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  I. Simonson,et al.  Choice Based on Reasons: The Case of Attraction and Compromise Effects , 1989 .

[7]  S. Moscovici Social influence and conformity , 1985 .

[8]  Robert C. Blattberg,et al.  Price-Induced Patterns of Competition , 1989 .

[9]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Attitude and selective learning: where are the phenomena of yesteryear? , 1967, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  Christopher P. Puto,et al.  Adding Asymmetrically Dominated Alternatives: Violations of Regularity & the Similarity Hypothesis. , 1981 .

[11]  J. Schooler,et al.  Verbal overshadowing of visual memories: Some things are better left unsaid , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[13]  M. F. Luce,et al.  Constructive Consumer Choice Processes , 1998 .

[14]  Amitava Chattopadhyay,et al.  Transitions in Preference over Time: The Effects of Memory on Message Persuasiveness , 1992 .

[15]  I. Simonson,et al.  Attribute–Task Compatibility as a Determinant of Consumer Preference Reversals: , 1997 .

[16]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[17]  A. Vinokur,et al.  Novel argumentation and attitude change: The case of polarization following group discussion , 1978 .

[18]  R. Baumeister A SELF-PRESENTATIONAL VIEW OF SOCIAL PHENOMENA , 1982 .

[19]  J. Little,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of Latitude of Price Acceptance in Consumer Package Goods , 1994 .

[20]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Thinking too much: introspection can reduce the quality of preferences and decisions. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  R. Wyer Information redundancy, inconsistency, and novelty and their role in impression formation , 1970 .

[22]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Reasoning and the weighting of attributes in attitude judgments , 1996 .

[23]  Curtis P. Haugtvedt,et al.  Need for Cognition and Advertising: Understanding the Role of Personality Variables in Consumer Behavior , 1992 .

[24]  M. Lynn Scarcity effects on value: A quantitative review of the commodity theory literature , 1991 .

[25]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias , 1991 .

[26]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  The verbal overshadowing effect: Why descriptions impair face recognition , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[27]  Peter Wright,et al.  Persuasion Knowledge , 2022 .

[28]  I. Simonson,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF ANTICIPATING REGRET AND RESPONSIBILITY ON PURCHASE DECISIONS , 1992 .

[29]  D. Isenberg Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis. , 1986 .

[30]  A. Tversky,et al.  Contingent weighting in judgment and choice , 1988 .

[31]  Bernard Guerin,et al.  Mere presence effects in humans: A review , 1986 .

[32]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Effects of introspecting about reasons: inferring attitudes from accessible thoughts. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[33]  P. Slovic Choice Between Equally Valued Alternatives. , 1975 .

[34]  P. Tetlock,et al.  Accounting for the effects of accountability. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[35]  A. Tversky,et al.  Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model , 1991 .

[36]  R. Cialdini,et al.  Preference for Consistency: The Development of a Valid Measure and the Discovery of Surprising Behavioral Implications , 1995 .

[37]  William Samuelson,et al.  Status quo bias in decision making , 1988 .

[38]  A. Tversky,et al.  Choice in Context: Tradeoff Contrast and Extremeness Aversion , 1992 .

[39]  B. Kahn Consumer variety-seeking among goods and services: An integrative review , 1995 .

[40]  R. Cialdini,et al.  Social influence: Social norms, conformity and compliance. , 1998 .

[41]  Howard L. Fromkin,et al.  The Search for Uniqueness and Valuation of Scarcity , 1980 .

[42]  M. Brewer The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same Time , 1991 .

[43]  M. Bazerman Judgment in Managerial Decision Making , 1990 .

[44]  Berndt Brehmer,et al.  Does having to justify one's judgments change the nature of the judgment process? , 1983 .

[45]  S. Asch Effects of Group Pressure Upon the Modification and Distortion of Judgments , 1951 .

[46]  Joel Huber,et al.  Market Boundaries and Product Choice: Illustrating Attraction and Substitution Effects , 1983 .

[47]  I. Simonson The Effect of Purchase Quantity and Timing on Variety-Seeking Behavior , 1990 .

[48]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Verbal reports as data. , 1980 .

[49]  A. Tversky,et al.  The Disjunction Effect in Choice under Uncertainty , 1992 .

[50]  Eldar Shafir,et al.  Choosing versus rejecting: Why some options are both better and worse than others , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[51]  R. E. Burnkrant,et al.  Informational and Normative Social Influence in Buyer Behavior , 1975 .