Pareto Landscapes Analyses via Graph-Based Modeling for Interactive Decision-Making

We consider two complementary tasks for consuming optimization results of a given multiobjective problem by decision-makers. The underpinning in both exploratory tasks is analyzing Pareto landscapes, and we propose in both cases discrete graph-based reductions. Firstly, we introduce interactive navigation from a given suboptimal reference solution to Pareto efficient solution-points. The proposed traversal mechanism is based upon landscape improvement-transitions from the reference towards Pareto-dominating solutions in a baby-steps fashion – accepting relatively small variations in the design-space. The Efficient Frontier and the archive of Pareto suboptimal points are to be obtained by population-based multiobjective solvers, such as Evolutionary Multiobjective Algorithms. Secondly, we propose a framework for automatically recommending a preferable subset of points belonging to the Frontier that accounts for the decision-maker’s tendencies. We devise a line of action that activates one of two approaches: either recommending the top offensive team – the gain-prone subset of points, or the top defensive team – the loss-averse subset of points. We describe the entire recommendation process and formulate mixed-integer linear programs for solving its combinatorial graph-based problems.

[1]  Edsger W. Dijkstra,et al.  A note on two problems in connexion with graphs , 1959, Numerische Mathematik.

[2]  Michael Masin,et al.  Diversity Maximization Approach for Multiobjective Optimization , 2008, Oper. Res..

[3]  Ofer M. Shir,et al.  Algorithms for Finding Maximum Diversity of Design Variables in Multi-Objective Optimization , 2012, CSER.

[4]  S. P. Lloyd,et al.  Least squares quantization in PCM , 1982, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[5]  A. Messac,et al.  Smart Pareto filter: obtaining a minimal representation of multiobjective design space , 2004 .

[6]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[7]  Jyrki Wallenius,et al.  Multiple Criteria Decision Making: From Early History to the 21st Century , 2011 .

[8]  Indraneel Das A preference ordering among various Pareto optimal alternatives , 1999 .

[9]  Markus Stolze,et al.  Dealing with Learning in eCommerce Product Navigation and Decision Support : The Teaching Salesman Problem , 2003 .

[10]  Kathrin Klamroth,et al.  Pareto navigator for interactive nonlinear multiobjective optimization , 2010, OR Spectr..

[11]  B. Roy The outranking approach and the foundations of electre methods , 1991 .

[12]  Andreas Herrmann,et al.  Order in Product Customization Decisions: Evidence from Field Experiments , 2010, Journal of Political Economy.

[13]  Marco Laumanns,et al.  Performance assessment of multiobjective optimizers: an analysis and review , 2003, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[14]  M. L. Fisher,et al.  An analysis of approximations for maximizing submodular set functions—I , 1978, Math. Program..

[15]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs , 1976 .

[16]  Nic Wilson,et al.  Multi-objective Influence Diagrams , 2012, UAI.

[17]  Salvatore Greco,et al.  Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization , 2011, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[18]  Marco Farina,et al.  Fuzzy Optimality and Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization , 2003, EMO.

[19]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[20]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[21]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation , 1990 .

[22]  Josef Stoer,et al.  Numerische Mathematik 1 , 1989 .

[23]  Barry O'Sullivan,et al.  Critique graphs for catalogue navigation , 2008, RecSys '08.