Algorithm Configurations of MOEA/D with an Unbounded External Archive

In the evolutionary multi-objective optimization (EMO) community, it is usually assumed that the final population is presented to the decision maker as the result of the execution of an EMO algorithm. Recently, an unbounded external archive was used to evaluate the performance of EMO algorithms in some studies where a pre-specified number of solutions are selected from all the examined non-dominated solutions. In this framework, which is referred to as the solution selection framework, the final population does not have to be a good solution set. Thus, the solution selection framework offers higher flexibility to the design of EMO algorithms than the final population framework. In this paper, we examine the design of multi-objective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition (MOEA/D) under these two frameworks. First, we show that the performance of MOEA/D is improved by linearly changing the reference point specification during its execution through computational experiments with various combinations of initial and final specifications. Robust and high performance of the solution selection framework is observed. Then, we examine the use of a genetic algorithm-based offline hyper-heuristic method to find the best configuration of MOEA/D in each framework. Finally, we further discuss solution selection after the execution of an EMO algorithm in the solution selection framework.

[1]  David Corne,et al.  The Pareto archived evolution strategy: a new baseline algorithm for Pareto multiobjective optimisation , 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 Congress on Evolutionary Computation-CEC99 (Cat. No. 99TH8406).

[2]  Mitsuo Gen,et al.  Specification of Genetic Search Directions in Cellular Multi-objective Genetic Algorithms , 2001, EMO.

[3]  Hisao Ishibuchi,et al.  Behavior of Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms on Many-Objective Knapsack Problems , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[4]  Hisao Ishibuchi,et al.  Reference point specification in MOEA/D for multi-objective and many-objective problems , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC).

[5]  Hisao Ishibuchi,et al.  Performance of Decomposition-Based Many-Objective Algorithms Strongly Depends on Pareto Front Shapes , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[6]  Xin Yao,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of the Optimality and Monotonicity Properties of Multiobjective Archiving Methods , 2019, EMO.

[7]  Marco Laumanns,et al.  SPEA2: Improving the Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm For Multiobjective Optimization , 2002 .

[8]  R. Lyndon While,et al.  A Scalable Multi-objective Test Problem Toolkit , 2005, EMO.

[9]  Qingfu Zhang,et al.  MOEA/D: A Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm Based on Decomposition , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[10]  John E. Dennis,et al.  Normal-Boundary Intersection: A New Method for Generating the Pareto Surface in Nonlinear Multicriteria Optimization Problems , 1998, SIAM J. Optim..

[11]  Hisao Ishibuchi,et al.  An analysis of control parameters of MOEA/D under two different optimization scenarios , 2018, Appl. Soft Comput..

[12]  C. A. Coello Coello,et al.  Evolutionary multi-objective optimization: a historical view of the field , 2006, IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine.

[13]  Eckart Zitzler,et al.  HypE: An Algorithm for Fast Hypervolume-Based Many-Objective Optimization , 2011, Evolutionary Computation.

[14]  Xin Yao,et al.  A New Dominance Relation-Based Evolutionary Algorithm for Many-Objective Optimization , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[15]  Hisao Ishibuchi,et al.  Benchmarking Multi- and Many-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms Under Two Optimization Scenarios , 2017, IEEE Access.

[16]  Hisao Ishibuchi,et al.  A Study on the Specification of a Scalarizing Function in MOEA/D for Many-Objective Knapsack Problems , 2013, LION.

[17]  R. K. Ursem Multi-objective Optimization using Evolutionary Algorithms , 2009 .

[18]  Nicola Beume,et al.  SMS-EMOA: Multiobjective selection based on dominated hypervolume , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[19]  Tobias Friedrich,et al.  Generic Postprocessing via Subset Selection for Hypervolume and Epsilon-Indicator , 2014, PPSN.

[20]  Tao Zhang,et al.  On the effect of reference point in MOEA/D for multi-objective optimization , 2017, Appl. Soft Comput..

[21]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[22]  Tapabrata Ray,et al.  Distance-Based Subset Selection for Benchmarking in Evolutionary Multi/Many-Objective Optimization , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[23]  H. Ishibuchi,et al.  On the effect of normalization in MOEA/D for multi-objective and many-objective optimization , 2017 .

[24]  Ye Tian,et al.  PlatEMO: A MATLAB Platform for Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization [Educational Forum] , 2017, IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine.