Organization Principles in Genetic Interaction Networks

Understanding how genetic modifications, individual or in combinations, affect phenotypes is a challenge common to several areas of biology, including human genetics, metabolic engineering, and evolutionary biology. Much of the complexity of how genetic modifications produce phenotypic outcomes has to do with the lack of independence, or epistasis, between different perturbations: the phenotypic effect of one perturbation depends, in general, on the genetic background of previously accumulated modifications, i.e., on the network of interactions with other perturbations. In recent years, an increasing number of high-throughput efforts, both experimental and computational, have focused on trying to unravel these genetic interaction networks. Here we provide an overview of how systems biology approaches have contributed to, and benefited from, the study of genetic interaction networks. We focus, in particular, on results pertaining to the global multilevel properties of these networks, and the connection between their modular architecture and their functional and evolutionary significance.

[1]  Calin Belta,et al.  Investigating the genomic basis of metabolic robustness through in silico flux analysis , 2008, 2008 47th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[2]  Dominique Gauguier,et al.  Direct quantitative trait locus mapping of mammalian metabolic phenotypes in diabetic and normoglycemic rat models , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[3]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  Robustness–epistasis link shapes the fitness landscape of a randomly drifting protein , 2006, Nature.

[4]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  Functional characterization of the S. cerevisiae genome by gene deletion and parallel analysis. , 1999, Science.

[5]  S. Oliver,et al.  Plasticity of genetic interactions in metabolic networks of yeast , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  T. Aittokallio,et al.  Genome-Wide Scoring of Positive and Negative Epistasis through Decomposition of Quantitative Genetic Interaction Fitness Matrices , 2010, PloS one.

[7]  T. Tregenza,et al.  GENETIC ARCHITECTURE OF METABOLIC RATE: ENVIRONMENT SPECIFIC EPISTASIS BETWEEN MITOCHONDRIAL AND NUCLEAR GENES IN AN INSECT , 2010, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[8]  Nikita A. Sakhanenko,et al.  A systems-biology approach to modular genetic complexity. , 2010, Chaos.

[9]  Joachim Selbig,et al.  Identification of metabolic and biomass QTL in Arabidopsis thaliana in a parallel analysis of RIL and IL populations , 2007, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[10]  Jason H. Moore,et al.  A global view of epistasis , 2005, Nature Genetics.

[11]  Gary D Bader,et al.  Systematic Genetic Analysis with Ordered Arrays of Yeast Deletion Mutants , 2001, Science.

[12]  H. Cordell Epistasis: what it means, what it doesn't mean, and statistical methods to detect it in humans. , 2002, Human molecular genetics.

[13]  Manuel Peitsch,et al.  A genome-based approach for the identification of essential bacterial genes , 1998, Nature Biotechnology.

[14]  Robert P. St.Onge,et al.  Defining genetic interaction , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  D. Kliebenstein Advancing Genetic Theory and Application by Metabolic Quantitative Trait Loci Analysis , 2009, The Plant Cell Online.

[16]  Evan S Snitkin,et al.  Optimality criteria for the prediction of metabolic fluxes in yeast mutants. , 2008, Genome informatics. International Conference on Genome Informatics.

[17]  Lingchong You,et al.  Dependence of epistasis on environment and mutation severity as revealed by in silico mutagenesis of phage t7. , 2002, Genetics.

[18]  Grant W. Brown,et al.  Integration of chemical-genetic and genetic interaction data links bioactive compounds to cellular target pathways , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[19]  E. Ruppin,et al.  Multiple knockout analysis of genetic robustness in the yeast metabolic network , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[20]  A. Sousa,et al.  Positive Epistasis Drives the Acquisition of Multidrug Resistance , 2009, PLoS genetics.

[21]  R. Lenski,et al.  Expression Profiles Reveal Parallel Evolution of Epistatic Interactions Involving the CRP Regulon in Escherichia coli , 2008, PLoS genetics.

[22]  G Stephanopoulos,et al.  Metabolic engineering. , 1999, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[23]  Jason H. Moore,et al.  Artificial Immune Systems for Epistasis Analysis in Human Genetics , 2010, EvoBIO.

[24]  S. Bhatia,et al.  Metabolic engineering for the production of clinically important molecules: Omega‐3 fatty acids, artemisinin, and taxol , 2012, Biotechnology journal.

[25]  P. Silver,et al.  Emergent cooperation in microbial metabolism , 2010, Molecular systems biology.

[26]  Sean R. Collins,et al.  Exploration of the Function and Organization of the Yeast Early Secretory Pathway through an Epistatic Miniarray Profile , 2005, Cell.

[27]  A. Wagner Distributed robustness versus redundancy as causes of mutational robustness. , 2005, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[28]  Eric J. Hayden,et al.  Cryptic genetic variation promotes rapid evolutionary adaptation in an RNA enzyme , 2011, Nature.

[29]  Jason H. Moore,et al.  The Ubiquitous Nature of Epistasis in Determining Susceptibility to Common Human Diseases , 2003, Human Heredity.

[30]  R. Solé,et al.  Simple genomes, complex interactions: epistasis in RNA virus. , 2010, Chaos.

[31]  H. Qian,et al.  Thermodynamic constraints for biochemical networks. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[32]  Evan S Snitkin,et al.  Model-driven analysis of experimentally determined growth phenotypes for 465 yeast gene deletion mutants under 16 different conditions , 2008, Genome Biology.

[33]  Calin Belta,et al.  Exploiting the pathway structure of metabolism to reveal high-order epistasis , 2008, BMC Systems Biology.

[34]  G. Wagner,et al.  EVOLUTION AND DETECTION OF GENETIC ROBUSTNESS , 2003 .

[35]  Marcus W Feldman,et al.  On the Classification of Epistatic Interactions , 2010, Genetics.

[36]  J. Keasling Manufacturing Molecules Through Metabolic Engineering , 2010, Science.

[37]  Susan E. Abbatiello,et al.  Erratum: Synergistic drug combinations tend to improve therapeutically relevant selectivity , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.

[38]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Metabolic network analysis of the causes and evolution of enzyme dispensability in yeast , 2004 .

[39]  R. Kishony,et al.  Antibiotic interactions that select against resistance , 2007, Nature.

[40]  Roded Sharan,et al.  Systematic condition-dependent annotation of metabolic genes. , 2007, Genome research.

[41]  A. Kondrashov Deleterious mutations and the evolution of sexual reproduction , 1988, Nature.

[42]  Kenneth J. Kauffman,et al.  Advances in flux balance analysis. , 2003, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[43]  Nigel F. Delaney,et al.  Darwinian Evolution Can Follow Only Very Few Mutational Paths to Fitter Proteins , 2006, Science.

[44]  Ralph J. Greenspan,et al.  The flexible genome , 2001, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[45]  A. M. Rose,et al.  Epistasis: the key to understanding immunological disease? , 2011, European journal of immunology.

[46]  S. Elena,et al.  The causes of epistasis , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[47]  B. Palsson,et al.  Metabolic modelling of microbes: the flux-balance approach. , 2002, Environmental microbiology.

[48]  Gary D. Bader,et al.  Protein Complexes are Central in the Yeast Genetic Landscape , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[49]  J. Hopfield,et al.  From molecular to modular cell biology , 1999, Nature.

[50]  Aarash Bordbar,et al.  A multi-tissue type genome-scale metabolic network for analysis of whole-body systems physiology , 2011, BMC Systems Biology.

[51]  P. Phillips Epistasis — the essential role of gene interactions in the structure and evolution of genetic systems , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[52]  S. Leibler,et al.  Environmental stresses can alleviate the average deleterious effect of mutations , 2003, Journal of biology.

[53]  S. Oliver,et al.  An integrated approach to characterize genetic interaction networks in yeast metabolism , 2011, Nature Genetics.

[54]  D. Segrè,et al.  Epistasis from functional dependence of fitness on underlying traits , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[55]  Scott M. Williams,et al.  Traversing the conceptual divide between biological and statistical epistasis: systems biology and a more modern synthesis. , 2005, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[56]  R. Kishony,et al.  Functional classification of drugs by properties of their pairwise interactions , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[57]  U. Sauer,et al.  Systematic evaluation of objective functions for predicting intracellular fluxes in Escherichia coli , 2007, Molecular systems biology.

[58]  Gabriela Kalna,et al.  Haem oxygenase is synthetically lethal with the tumour suppressor fumarate hydratase , 2011, Nature.

[59]  Karen M Polizzi What is synthetic biology? , 2013, Methods in molecular biology.

[60]  B. Palsson,et al.  Genome-scale reconstruction of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolic network. , 2003, Genome research.

[61]  Mario Cortina-Borja,et al.  Epistasis in sporadic Alzheimer's disease , 2009, Neurobiology of Aging.

[62]  J. Stelling,et al.  Robustness of Cellular Functions , 2004, Cell.

[63]  M. Wade,et al.  Epistasis and the Evolutionary Process , 2000 .

[64]  Jay D. Keasling,et al.  Metabolic engineering for drug discovery and development , 2003, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[65]  William Bateson,et al.  Mendel's principles of heredity : a defence, with a translation of Mendel's original papers on hybridisation , 2009 .

[66]  C. Burch,et al.  Patterns of epistasis in RNA viruses: a review of the evidence from vaccine design , 2003, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[67]  Calin Belta,et al.  Deep epistasis in human metabolism. , 2010, Chaos.

[68]  J. Lehár,et al.  High-order combination effects and biological robustness , 2008, Molecular systems biology.

[69]  Nigel F. Delaney,et al.  Diminishing Returns Epistasis Among Beneficial Mutations Decelerates Adaptation , 2011, Science.

[70]  Jeffrey D Orth,et al.  What is flux balance analysis? , 2010, Nature Biotechnology.

[71]  Gavin Sherlock,et al.  Reciprocal Sign Epistasis between Frequently Experimentally Evolved Adaptive Mutations Causes a Rugged Fitness Landscape , 2011, PLoS genetics.

[72]  D. J. Kiviet,et al.  Reciprocal sign epistasis is a necessary condition for multi-peaked fitness landscapes. , 2011, Journal of theoretical biology.

[73]  Markus J. Herrgård,et al.  Reconstruction and validation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae iND750, a fully compartmentalized genome-scale metabolic model. , 2004, Genome research.

[74]  R. Mahadevan,et al.  The effects of alternate optimal solutions in constraint-based genome-scale metabolic models. , 2003, Metabolic engineering.

[75]  Sean R. Collins,et al.  A strategy for extracting and analyzing large-scale quantitative epistatic interaction data , 2006, Genome Biology.

[76]  Adam M. Feist,et al.  A comprehensive genome-scale reconstruction of Escherichia coli metabolism—2011 , 2011, Molecular systems biology.

[77]  Nagasuma R. Chandra,et al.  Flux balance analysis of biological systems: applications and challenges , 2009, Briefings Bioinform..

[78]  N. Crawford,et al.  The future of mouse QTL mapping to diagnose disease in mice in the age of whole-genome association studies. , 2008, Annual review of genetics.

[79]  E. Andrianantoandro,et al.  Synthetic biology: new engineering rules for an emerging discipline , 2006, Molecular systems biology.

[80]  G. Church,et al.  Modular epistasis in yeast metabolism , 2005, Nature Genetics.

[81]  Shizhong Xu,et al.  Joint Mapping of Quantitative Trait Loci for Multiple Binary Characters , 2005, Genetics.

[82]  Richard E. Lenski,et al.  Bacterial Population Negative Epistasis Between Beneficial Mutations in an Evolving , 2012 .

[83]  B. Palsson,et al.  In silico predictions of Escherichia coli metabolic capabilities are consistent with experimental data , 2001, Nature Biotechnology.

[84]  N. Lehman The molecular underpinnings of genetic phenomena , 2008, Heredity.

[85]  Gary D Bader,et al.  Global Mapping of the Yeast Genetic Interaction Network , 2004, Science.

[86]  Richard A. Watson,et al.  PERSPECTIVE:SIGN EPISTASIS AND GENETIC CONSTRAINT ON EVOLUTIONARY TRAJECTORIES , 2005 .

[87]  B. Palsson,et al.  Stoichiometric flux balance models quantitatively predict growth and metabolic by-product secretion in wild-type Escherichia coli W3110 , 1994, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[88]  Michael Costanzo,et al.  Charting the genetic interaction map of a cell. , 2011, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[89]  N. Young QTL mapping and quantitative disease resistance in plants. , 1996, Annual review of phytopathology.

[90]  C. Hoggart,et al.  Pathway Analysis of GWAS Provides New Insights into Genetic Susceptibility to 3 Inflammatory Diseases , 2009, PloS one.

[91]  R. B. Azevedo,et al.  Sexual reproduction selects for robustness and negative epistasis in artificial gene networks , 2006, Nature.

[92]  Q. Ouyang,et al.  The yeast cell-cycle network is robustly designed. , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[93]  Isaac Meilijson,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of Genetic and Neuronal Multi-Perturbation Experiments , 2005, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[94]  Trey Ideker,et al.  Functional Maps of Protein Complexes from Quantitative Genetic Interaction Data , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[95]  U. Alon,et al.  Optimality and evolutionary tuning of the expression level of a protein , 2005, Nature.

[96]  Gary D Bader,et al.  The Genetic Landscape of a Cell , 2010, Science.

[97]  Chris S. Haley,et al.  Epistasis: too often neglected in complex trait studies? , 2004, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[98]  Bernhard O. Palsson,et al.  Connecting Extracellular Metabolomic Measurements to Intracellular Flux States in Yeast , 2022 .

[99]  J. Draghi,et al.  Epistasis Increases the Rate of Conditionally Neutral Substitution in an Adapting Population , 2011, Genetics.

[100]  Daniel Segrè,et al.  Environments that Induce Synthetic Microbial Ecosystems , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[101]  B. Palsson,et al.  Large-scale evaluation of in silico gene deletions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2003, Omics : a journal of integrative biology.

[102]  Isaac Meilijson,et al.  Can single knockouts accurately single out gene functions? , 2008, BMC Systems Biology.

[103]  Daniel Segrè,et al.  Ecosystems biology of microbial metabolism. , 2011, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[104]  Daniel Segrè,et al.  Epistatic Interaction Maps Relative to Multiple Metabolic Phenotypes , 2011, PLoS genetics.

[105]  Roy Kishony,et al.  Drug interactions and the evolution of antibiotic resistance , 2009, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[106]  Thomas Lenormand,et al.  Distributions of epistasis in microbes fit predictions from a fitness landscape model , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[107]  Aviv Bergman,et al.  Coevolution of robustness, epistasis, and recombination favors asexual reproduction , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[108]  A. Kondrashov,et al.  Multidimensional epistasis and the disadvantage of sex , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[109]  L. Kruglyak,et al.  Genetic Dissection of Transcriptional Regulation in Budding Yeast , 2002, Science.

[110]  G. Church,et al.  Analysis of optimality in natural and perturbed metabolic networks , 2002 .

[111]  Adam M. Feist,et al.  A genome-scale metabolic reconstruction for Escherichia coli K-12 MG1655 that accounts for 1260 ORFs and thermodynamic information , 2007, Molecular systems biology.

[112]  Rachel B. Brem,et al.  The landscape of genetic complexity across 5,700 gene expression traits in yeast. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[113]  Steffen Klamt,et al.  Hypergraphs and Cellular Networks , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[114]  P. Phillips The language of gene interaction. , 1998, Genetics.

[115]  Markus J. Herrgård,et al.  A consensus yeast metabolic network reconstruction obtained from a community approach to systems biology , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[116]  Steffen Klamt,et al.  Minimal cut sets in biochemical reaction networks , 2004, Bioinform..

[117]  Annie E. Hill,et al.  Genetic architecture of complex traits: Large phenotypic effects and pervasive epistasis , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[118]  T. Ideker,et al.  Systematic interpretation of genetic interactions using protein networks , 2005, Nature Biotechnology.

[119]  B. McKinney,et al.  Recursive expectation-maximization clustering: a method for identifying buffering mechanisms composed of phenomic modules. , 2010, Chaos.