Exploring Engagement as a Predictor of Success in the Transition to Online Learning in First Year Chemistry

Rapid campus closure and unexpected transition to emergency online teaching of a large first year chemistry unit provided an opportunity to explore the level of student engagement and factors associated with success in this online transition. Here, we compared the standard offering in 2019 to the online version in 2020 by examining the completion of weekly assessment tasks and the uptake of learning activities. In spite of a preference for face-to-face learning, we found that students were able to quickly adapt to using the technology, with high levels of access to live streamed and recorded lectures, in-class polling, and online tutorials, together with large increases in discussion forum use. The change in level of engagement in low stakes assessment tasks over the course of the semester was similar for both years. Each form of engagement was associated with increased likelihood of success in the unit, whether this was being taught face-to-face or online. Of the multiple forms of engagement measured, only tutorial participation had a significantly lower impact on student success in the online compared to the face-to-face environment.

[1]  D. Callahan,et al.  Development and Use of Kitchen Chemistry Home Practical Activities during Unanticipated Campus Closures , 2020 .

[2]  Elli J. Theobald,et al.  Reducing achievement gaps in undergraduate general chemistry could lift underrepresented students into a “hyperpersistent zone” , 2020, Science Advances.

[3]  Megan K. Barker,et al.  Small changes, big gains: A curriculum-wide study of teaching practices and student learning in undergraduate biology , 2019, PloS one.

[4]  V. Talanquer,et al.  Reforming a Large Foundational Course: Successes and Challenges , 2017 .

[5]  Simon B Bedford,et al.  Evaluation of diagnostic tools that tertiary teachers can apply to profile their students’ conceptions , 2017 .

[6]  Gabriela C. Weaver,et al.  Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of a Flipped Format General Chemistry Course , 2015 .

[7]  Stacey Lowery Bretz,et al.  The Development of the Redox Concept Inventory as a Measure of Students' Symbolic and Particulate Redox Understandings and Confidence. , 2014 .

[8]  Christopher F. Bauer,et al.  Identifying At-Risk Students in General Chemistry via Cluster Analysis of Affective Characteristics , 2014 .

[9]  Stacey Lowery Bretz,et al.  Development of the Bonding Representations Inventory to Identify Student Misconceptions about Covalent and Ionic Bonding Representations. , 2014 .

[10]  Simon B Bedford,et al.  Using formative feedback to identify and support first-year chemistry students with missing or misconceptions. A Practice Report , 2013 .

[11]  Paul T. Pearson,et al.  A Genetically Optimized Predictive System for Success in General Chemistry Using a Diagnostic Algebra Test , 2012 .

[12]  Madeleine Schultz,et al.  Sustainable Assessment for Large Science Classes: Non-Multiple Choice, Randomised Assignments through a Learning Management System , 2011 .

[13]  Scott E. Lewis,et al.  Attitude Counts: Self-Concept and Success in General Chemistry , 2009 .

[14]  Philip M. Sadler,et al.  Factors Influencing Success in Introductory College Chemistry , 2005 .

[15]  R. Coll,et al.  Development of Chemistry Attitudes and Experiences Questionnaire (CAEQ). , 2003 .

[16]  G. Lawrie,et al.  Insights and Teacher Perceptions Regarding Students’ Conceptions as They Enter Tertiary Chemistry Studies: a Comparative Study , 2018 .