Using TEALE learning methodology to promote portable interdisciplinary accountability in engineering education

Research suggests that an increase in learner mobility across formal and informal jurisdictions is a positive response to an integrated global economy and workforce. To facilitate ebbs and flows of maintaining a mobile global workforce, the literature suggests that engineering education should promote methodology and learning mechanisms that personalize accountability of mobile learners' content knowledge across jurisdictions. In addition, data from the literature shows that mobile or cyber-learning is generating massive amounts of data which could inform engineering educators in their response to a mobile and constantly changing workforce. This paper reviews data from a pilot study of Technology-Enhanced Autonomous Learning Environment (TEALE). TEALE is a framework for mobile learning environments that afford accountability of personalized evidence-based content across learning jurisdictions. Prelimary data from this third pilot report suggests that TEALE promotes accountability of content knowledge across learning jurisdictions: both among formal disciplines in the academy, as well as between the academy, informal learning and workplace requirements. However, the data also suggests that seamless mobility across these academic and social jurisdictions involves issues far beyond technology. These issues, which include adjudicating relevance and value among academic cultures, incentives for motivation, authority and autonomy should be accounted for when using TEALE. Attention to these issues could prevent engineering educators from viewing potential opportunities for inter-jurisdictional collaborations as encroachments and avert the specter of unintended social-dramas.

[1]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Disrupting Class: How Disruptive Innovation Will Change the Way the World Learns , 2008 .

[2]  Barbara M. Olds,et al.  On Becoming a 21st Century Engineer , 2008 .

[3]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[4]  M. Cane,et al.  Global adjustment of the thermocline in response to deepwater formation , 2000 .

[5]  Crafting Museum Experiences in Light of Research on Learning: Implications of the National Research Council’s Report on Informal Science Education , 2010 .

[6]  J. Bransford,et al.  How People Learn: Bridging Research and Practice , 2013 .

[7]  Karan Watson Change in Engineering Education: Where Does Research Fit? , 2009 .

[8]  Lynroy Grant,et al.  Successful integration of informal learning in engineering education , 2012, Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON).

[9]  S. C. Ehrmann IMPLEMENTING THE SEVEN PRINCIPLES: Technology as Lever , 2004 .

[10]  John L. Hubisz Surrounded by Science: Learning Science in Informal Environments , 2014 .

[11]  R. Pieters,et al.  Who talks to whom? Intra-and interdisciplinary communication of economics journals , 2002 .

[12]  D. Baker,et al.  Evaluation of the Impact of Two After-School Programs , 1996 .

[13]  Frank Moss The Sorcerers and Their Apprentices: How the Digital Magicians of the MIT Media Lab Are Creating the Innovative Technologies That Will Transform Our Lives , 2011 .

[14]  唐力忻 Autonomy and Foreign Language Learning , 2010 .

[15]  A. Chickering,et al.  Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education , 1987, CORE.

[16]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[17]  E. Crawley,et al.  Achieving excellence in engineering education: the ingredients of successful change , 2012 .

[18]  C. Bao Iturbe,et al.  Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering education to the new century , 2009, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[19]  Ruth Graham,et al.  The One Less Traveled By: The Road to Lasting Systemic Change in Engineering Education , 2012 .

[20]  D. Huang An After-School Evaluation System for Middle and High School Programs , 2001 .

[21]  Gary Gabriele Advancing Engineering Education in a Flattened World , 2005 .

[22]  Андрей Соколов,et al.  Тестовый доступ к двум журналам на платформе издательства American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) , 2012 .

[23]  G. Hein Learning Science in Informal Environments: People, Places, and Pursuits , 2009 .

[24]  G. Wayne Clough The Engineer of 2020 Project , 2005 .

[25]  Lynroy Grant,et al.  Fostering Learner Mobility Between Engineering Education and a Twenty First Century Workplace , 2011, Int. J. Adv. Corp. Learn..

[26]  M. Albanese,et al.  Problem‐based Learning: A Review of Literature on Its Outcomes and Implementation Issues , 1993, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[27]  R. Kurzweil,et al.  The Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology , 2006 .

[28]  M. Albanese,et al.  Problem‐based learning: why curricula are likely to show little effect on knowledge and clinical skills , 2000, Medical education.

[29]  Steven M. Cramer,et al.  Redefining Quality in Engineering Education Through Hybrid Instruction , 2011 .

[30]  Christine Reid,et al.  The Myth of the Paperless Office , 2003, J. Documentation.

[31]  N. Augustine Rising Above The Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future , 2006 .

[32]  H. Walberg,et al.  Toward a Knowledge Base for School Learning , 1993 .