Efficiency measurement for multi-product industries: A comparison of classic and recent techniques based on simulated data

Abstract In this paper, a cost function is used to generate the data of six samples of firms producing three outputs by means of two factors; this data-generation process is designed to reflect some structural characteristics of multi-product industries: e.g., the production levels of the different outputs are highly correlated and big producers are less frequent than small ones. A known amount of inefficiency and random noise is then added to each production plan. Finally we compare the “true” inefficiency levels to those estimated through the following techniques: stochastic frontiers, DEA, and stochastic DEA (two original models are also developed). All the “classic” techniques (translog cost function, CRS DEA, VRS DEA) perform well, although the first one can not achieve a satisfactory decomposition of efficiency into its allocative and technical causes. The stochastic DEA models can outperform the “classics” in some specific situations, but on average they cannot compete with older techniques; however, the two new stochastic DEA models perform better than the standard one.

[1]  Leigh Drake,et al.  Economies of scale and scope in UK building societies: an application of the translog multiproduct cost function , 1992 .

[2]  James W. Kolari,et al.  Branch office economies of scale and scope: evidence from savings banks in Finland , 1994 .

[3]  R. Stevenson.  Likelihood functions for generalized stochastic frontier estimation , 1980 .

[4]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Data envelopment analysis and regression approaches to efficiency estimation and evaluation , 1984, Ann. Oper. Res..

[5]  Byeong-Ho Gong,et al.  Finite sample evidence on the performance of stochastic frontiers and data envelopment analysis using panel data , 1992 .

[6]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Chapter 11 Simulation studies of efficiency, returns to scale and misspecification with nonlinear functions in DEA , 1996, Ann. Oper. Res..

[7]  C. Lovell,et al.  Estimating technical and allocative inefficiency relative to stochastic production and cost frontiers , 1979 .

[8]  Moshe Kim,et al.  Banking technology and the existence of a consistent output aggregate , 1986 .

[9]  W. Greene.  On the estimation of a flexible frontier production model , 1980 .

[10]  R. Kopp,et al.  The decomposition of frontier cost function deviations into measures of technical and allocative efficiency , 1982 .

[11]  C. Lovell,et al.  On the estimation of technical inefficiency in the stochastic frontier production function model , 1982 .

[12]  Gary D. Ferrier,et al.  Measuring cost efficiency in banking: Econometric and linear programming evidence , 1990 .

[13]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[14]  Antreas D. Athanassopoulos,et al.  A Comparison of Data Envelopment Analysis and Artificial Neural Networks as Tools for Assessing the Efficiency of Decision Making Units , 1996 .

[15]  Andrea Resti.  Evaluating the cost-efficiency of the Italian Banking System: What can be learned from the joint application of parametric and non-parametric techniques , 1997 .

[16]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[17]  R. Färe,et al.  The measurement of efficiency of production , 1985 .

[18]  Abraham Isaac Brodt,et al.  A dynamic balance sheet management model for a Canadian chartered bank , 1978 .

[19]  R. Banker,et al.  A Monte Carlo comparison of two production frontier estimation methods: Corrected ordinary least squares and data envelopment analysis , 1993 .

[20]  G. Battese,et al.  Prediction of firm-level technical efficiencies with a generalized frontier production function and panel data , 1988 .

[21]  A. Charnes,et al.  A Comparison of DEA and Translog Estimates of Production Frontiers Using Simulated Observations from a Known Technology , 1988 .

[22]  Andrea Resti,et al.  Linear Programming and Econometric Methods for Bank Efficiency Evaluation: an Empirical Comparison Based on a Panel of Italian Banks , 1996 .

[23]  R. Grabowski,et al.  Technical, Scale, and Allocative Efficiencies in U.S. Banking: An Empirical Investigation , 1990 .

[24]  Paul J. Speaker,et al.  Economies of Scale and Scope in Banking: Evidence From a Generalized Translog Cost Function , 1994 .

[25]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Estimating preferred target input−output levels using data envelopment analysis , 1992 .

[26]  Subal C. Kumbhakar,et al.  THE MEASUREMENT AND DECOMPOSITION OF COST-INEFFICIENCY: THE TRANSLOG COST SYSTEM* , 1991 .

[27]  Harold O. Fried,et al.  The measurement of productive efficiency : techniques and applications , 1993 .

[28]  R. Shepherd.  Theory of cost and production functions , 1970 .

[29]  C. Lovell,et al.  Estimating stochastic production and cost frontiers when technical and allocative inefficiency are correlated , 1980 .

[30]  Richard C. Morey,et al.  A goal-programming method of stochastic allocative data envelopment analysis , 1993 .