Scanning errors in holographic tomography

In holographic tomography obtaining projections is the key part of the measurement process that enables the 3D refractive index reconstruction. The error of the illumination angle can significantly influence the reconstruction quality and alter the result degrading the reliability of the reconstruction. Thus, in this paper the impact of the scanning errors in limited angle holographic tomography with respect to two reconstruction algorithms is analyzed. The simulated errors are compared to the errors identified in the experimental system. The reconstruction errors are verified using a paramecium cell phantom at the simulation stage and with a biological object, namely a macrophage cell in the experimental part. The experimental system presented in the paper exhibits maximum expected measurement errors found in galvanometer-mirror-based holographic tomography setups.

[1]  P. Marquet,et al.  Marker-free phase nanoscopy , 2013, Nature Photonics.

[2]  C. Fang-Yen,et al.  Tomographic phase microscopy , 2008, Nature Methods.

[3]  Piotr Makowski,et al.  Generalized total variation iterative constraint strategy in limited angle optical diffraction tomography. , 2016, Optics express.

[4]  Arkadiusz Kuś,et al.  Illumination-related errors in limited-angle optical diffraction tomography. , 2017, Applied optics.

[5]  P. Marquet,et al.  Living specimen tomography by digital holographic microscopy: morphometry of testate amoeba. , 2006, Optics express.

[6]  Malgorzata Kujawinska,et al.  Active limited-angle tomographic phase microscope , 2015, Journal of biomedical optics.

[7]  Yongjin Sung,et al.  Stain-Free Quantification of Chromosomes in Live Cells Using Regularized Tomographic Phase Microscopy , 2012, PloS one.

[8]  P. Makowski,et al.  Total variation iterative constraint algorithm for limited-angle tomographic reconstruction of non-piecewise-constant structures , 2015, Optical Metrology.

[9]  YongKeun Park,et al.  High-resolution three-dimensional imaging of red blood cells parasitized by Plasmodium falciparum and in situ hemozoin crystals using optical diffraction tomography , 2013, Journal of biomedical optics.

[10]  Björn Kemper,et al.  Tomographic phase microscopy of living three-dimensional cell cultures , 2014, Journal of biomedical optics.

[11]  YongKeun Park,et al.  Time-multiplexed structured illumination using a DMD for optical diffraction tomography. , 2017, Optics letters.

[12]  E. Wolf.  Three-dimensional structure determination of semi-transparent objects from holographic data , 1969 .

[13]  Malgorzata Kujawinska,et al.  Limited-angle hybrid optical diffraction tomography system with total-variation-minimization-based reconstruction , 2015 .

[14]  Jonghee Yoon,et al.  Optical diffraction tomography using a digital micromirror device for stable measurements of 4D refractive index tomography of cells , 2016, SPIE BiOS.

[15]  V. Lauer.  New approach to optical diffraction tomography yielding a vector equation of diffraction tomography and a novel tomographic microscope , 2002, Journal of microscopy.

[16]  Jong Chul Ye,et al.  Comparative study of iterative reconstruction algorithms for missing cone problems in optical diffraction tomography. , 2015, Optics express.

[17]  P. So,et al.  Diffraction optical tomography using a quantitative phase imaging unit. , 2014, Optics letters.

[18]  Sarah Mues,et al.  Digital holographic microscopy overcomes the limitations of in vitro nanomaterial cytotoxicity testing , 2017, BiOS.

[19]  A. Kuś,et al.  Advances in design and testing of limited angle optical diffraction tomographysystem for biological applications , 2016, SPIE BiOS.