Development of poly(lactide‐co‐glycolide) scaffold‐impregnated small intestinal submucosa with pores that stimulate extracellular matrix production in disc regeneration

The pore size and microstructure of scaffolds influences cell attachment, migration, proliferation and ingrowth, but the optimal pore size of scaffolds for disc tissue formation is not clearly understood. We developed porous poly(lactide‐co‐glycolide) (PLGA) scaffolds with various pore sizes for nucleus pulposus (NP) cell cultures and examined the effects of pore size on cell ingrowth and extracellular matrix (ECM) synthesis. High cell density in the small pores of scaffolds promotes collagen synthesis and cell migration through interconnected pores. Scaffolds with large pores exhibited slower cell proliferation and collagen synthesis. Guided by these results, we investigated a novel, biodegradable, synthetic/natural hybrid scaffold composed of PLGA and small intestinal submucosa (SIS) (PLGA–SIS) with the proper pore size for NP regeneration. We tested the morphological and physical properties of PLGA–SIS scaffolds and initial cell attachment and ECM production of NP in scaffolds. The mechanical and degradable properties of the PLGA–SIS scaffold were superior to those of SIS sponge and were similar to the properties of PLGA scaffold. NP cells grown on PLGA–SIS scaffold exhibited higher initial cell adhesion and ECM production than those grown on pure PLGA scaffold in a biological assay. In conclusion, this study suggests that a proper pore size of scaffolds is critical in NP regeneration, and that PLGA–SIS scaffolds with suitable pores might be useful as substrates for tissue‐engineered biodiscs. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  A. Albertsson,et al.  Porosity and pore size regulate the degradation product profile of polylactide. , 2011, Biomacromolecules.

[2]  Chiara Bertarelli,et al.  Microstructure and Cytocompatibility of Electrospun Nanocomposites Based on Poly(ɛ-Caprolactone) and Carbon Nanostructures , 2010, The International journal of artificial organs.

[3]  P. D. de Oliveira,et al.  Pore size regulates cell and tissue interactions with PLGA–CaP scaffolds used for bone engineering , 2012, Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

[4]  Paul Ducheyne,et al.  A three-dimensional nonlinear finite element analysis of the mechanical behavior of tissue engineered intervertebral discs under complex loads. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[5]  T. Anastassiades,et al.  Rates of glycosaminoglycan synthesis and rates of incorporation of radioactive precursors into newly synthesized glycosaminoglycan by confluent rat muscle fibroblasts. , 1980, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[6]  이해방,et al.  Effects of SIS/PLGA Porous Scaffolds and Muscle-Derived Stem Cell on the Formation of Tissue Engineered Bone , 2006 .

[7]  M. Shoichet,et al.  Design of three-dimensional biomimetic scaffolds. , 2010, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[8]  Munirah Sha'ban,et al.  Fibrin promotes proliferation and matrix production of intervertebral disc cells cultured in three-dimensional poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) scaffold , 2008, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[9]  Chao Zhang,et al.  Experimental intervertebral disc regeneration with tissue-engineered composite in a canine model. , 2010, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[10]  S. Badylak,et al.  Small intestinal submucosa: a substrate for in vitro cell growth. , 1998, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[11]  Moon Suk Kim,et al.  An in vivo study of the host tissue response to subcutaneous implantation of PLGA- and/or porcine small intestinal submucosa-based scaffolds. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[12]  H. Lee,et al.  The Characterization of PLGA/Small Intestinal Submucosa Composites as Scaffolds for Intervertebral Disc , 2007 .

[13]  V K Goel,et al.  Materials and design of spinal implants--a review. , 1997, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[14]  Sang Jin Lee,et al.  Macroporous biodegradable natural/synthetic hybrid scaffolds as small intestine submucosa impregnated poly(D, L-lactide-co-glycolide) for tissue-engineered bone , 2004, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[15]  S. Lee,et al.  Preparation of sponge using porcine small intesinal submucosa and their applications as a scaffold and a wound dressing. , 2006, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[16]  Dan T Simionescu,et al.  Novel tissue-derived biomimetic scaffold for regenerating the human nucleus pulposus. , 2011, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[17]  H. Fong,et al.  Electrospun nanofibrous polycaprolactone scaffolds for tissue engineering of annulus fibrosus. , 2011, Macromolecular bioscience.

[18]  Antonio Gloria,et al.  Polymer-based composite scaffolds for tissue engineering. , 2010, Journal of applied biomaterials & biomechanics : JABB.

[19]  Kyriacos Zygourakis,et al.  Cell population dynamics modulate the rates of tissue growth processes. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[20]  Junzo Tanaka,et al.  Culturing of skin fibroblasts in a thin PLGA-collagen hybrid mesh. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[21]  L G Griffith,et al.  Effect of pore size and void fraction on cellular adhesion, proliferation, and matrix deposition. , 2001, Tissue engineering.

[22]  C. Laurencin,et al.  Biphasic scaffold for annulus fibrosus tissue regeneration. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[23]  H. Lee,et al.  Evaluation of various types of scaffold for tissue engineered intervertebral disc. , 2006, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[24]  L. Gibson,et al.  The effect of pore size on cell adhesion in collagen-GAG scaffolds. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[25]  R. Ostelo,et al.  Total disc replacement surgery for symptomatic degenerative lumbar disc disease: a systematic review of the literature , 2010, European Spine Journal.

[26]  Benjamin M Wu,et al.  Effect of scaffold architecture and pore size on smooth muscle cell growth. , 2008, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[27]  W. Yeong,et al.  Engineering functionally graded tissue engineering scaffolds. , 2008, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[28]  K. Athanasiou,et al.  Effects of Initial Cell Seeding Density for the Tissue Engineering of the Temporomandibular Joint Disc , 2005, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[29]  Xinlin Yang,et al.  Nucleus pulposus tissue engineering: a brief review , 2009, European Spine Journal.

[30]  D J Mooney,et al.  Optimizing seeding and culture methods to engineer smooth muscle tissue on biodegradable polymer matrices. , 1998, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[31]  D. Butler,et al.  In vitro characterization of mesenchymal stem cell-seeded collagen scaffolds for tendon repair: effects of initial seeding density on contraction kinetics. , 2000, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[32]  Pieter Buma,et al.  Tissue ingrowth and degradation of two biodegradable porous polymers with different porosities and pore sizes. , 2002, Biomaterials.

[33]  Francesco Stellacci,et al.  Effect of surface properties on nanoparticle-cell interactions. , 2010, Small.

[34]  H. Lee,et al.  Reduction of inflammatory reaction of poly(d,l-lactic-co-glycolic Acid) using demineralized bone particles. , 2008, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[35]  Lutz Claes,et al.  Is a collagen scaffold for a tissue engineered nucleus replacement capable of restoring disc height and stability in an animal model? , 2006, European Spine Journal.

[36]  Shin-Ichiro Nishimura,et al.  Effect of pore size on in vitro cartilage formation using chitosan-based hyaluronic acid hybrid polymer fibers. , 2007, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[37]  Damien M O'Halloran,et al.  Tissue-engineering approach to regenerating the intervertebral disc. , 2007, Tissue engineering.