Population divergence and morphometric integration in the greenfinch (Carduelis chloris) – evolution against the trajectory of least resistance?

Theory predicts that genetic and phenotypic correlations among traits may direct the process of short‐term evolution by limiting the directions of variation available to natural selection to act on. We studied correlations between 14 skeletal traits in 10 geographically distinct and relatively young greenfinch (Carduelis chloris) populations to unravel whether the divergence among populations has occurred into directions predicted by the within‐population correlations (cf. drift/correlated responses models), or whether it is better explained by ‘adaptive’ models, which predict no necessary association between within‐ and among‐population correlations (allometries). We found that the within‐population character correlations (or covariances) did not predict character divergence between populations. This was because the first eigenvector of the among‐population correlation/covariance matrix, summarizing the major dimension of divergence, was a bipolar body:beak dimension, and distinct from the (≈ isometric) first eigenvector of within‐population matrix. Hence, as the divergence among greenfinch populations cannot be satisfactorily accommodated by drift/correlated response models, an adaptive basis for divergence is suggested. The second major axis of within‐population variation was a classical ‘group size’ factor revealing that beak size was more or less free to vary independently of body size. Consequently, even if the divergence among populations cannot be simply accommodated to expectations of drift and correlated response models, it is striking that the most pronounced size‐independent (nonallometric) changes had occurred along the second largest dimension of variance. This could mean that selection pressures which shape integration within populations are the same as those that cause divergence among populations. A relaxed beak:body integration could also occur as a result of species level selection favouring taxa in which independent evolution of beak and body is made possible.

[1]  Charles R. Brown,et al.  Ecology and Evolution of Darwin’s Finches , 2001, Heredity.

[2]  J. Merilä Quantitative trait and allozyme divergence in the Greenfinch (Carduelis chloris, Aves: Fringillidae) , 1997 .

[3]  A. Baker,et al.  GENETIC POPULATION STRUCTURE AND GRADUAL NORTHWARD DECLINE OF GENETIC VARIABILITY IN THE GREENFINCH (CARDUELIS CHLORIS) , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[4]  Dolph Schluter,et al.  ADAPTIVE RADIATION ALONG GENETIC LINES OF LEAST RESISTANCE , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[5]  M. Björklund,et al.  Geographic and individual variation in haematozoan infections in the greenfinch, Carduelis chloris , 1995 .

[6]  D. Roff The estimation of genetic correlations from phenotypic correlations: a test of Cheverud's conjecture , 1995, Heredity.

[7]  B. Grant,et al.  PREDICTING MICROEVOLUTIONARY RESPONSES TO DIRECTIONAL SELECTION ON HERITABLE VARIATION , 1995, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[8]  M. Björklund Species selection on organismal integration. , 1994, Journal of theoretical biology.

[9]  L. Gustafsson,et al.  Inheritance of size and shape in a natural population of collared flycatchers, Ficedula albicollis , 1993 .

[10]  M. Björklund,et al.  Morphological differentiation in Carduelis finches: Adaptive vs. constraint models , 1993 .

[11]  E. Lloyd,et al.  Species selection on variability. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  S. J. Arnold Constraints on Phenotypic Evolution , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[13]  W. Atchley,et al.  QUANTITATIVE GENETIC MODELS FOR DEVELOPMENT, EPIGENETIC SELECTION, AND PHENOTYPIC EVOLUTION , 1992, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[14]  M. Björklund Selection of bill size proportions in the Common Rosefinch (Carpodacus erythrinus) , 1992 .

[15]  M. Björklund Patterns of morphological variation among cardueline finches (Fringillidae: Carduelinae) , 1991 .

[16]  T. Smith,et al.  NATURAL SELECTION ON BILL CHARACTERS IN THE TWO BILL MORPHS OF THE AFRICAN FINCH PYRENESTES OSTRINUS , 1990, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[17]  R. Bailey,et al.  A NEW, OLD METHOD FOR ASSESSING MEASUREMENT ERROR IN BOTH UNIVARIATE AND MULTIVARIATE MORPHOMETRIC STUDIES , 1990 .

[18]  R. Strauss PATTERNS OF QUANTITATIVE VARIATION IN LEPIDOPTERAN WING MORPHOLOGY: THE CONVERGENT GROUPS HELICONIINAE AND ITHOMIINAE (PAPILIONOIDEA: NYMPHALIDAE) , 1990, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[19]  J. Cheverud A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MORPHOLOGICAL VARIATION PATTERNS IN THE PAPIONINS , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[20]  B. Riska COMPOSITE TRAITS, SELECTION RESPONSE, AND EVOLUTION , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[21]  Günter P. Wagner,et al.  Methods for the Comparative Analysis of Variation Patterns , 1989 .

[22]  H. Richner HABITAT-SPECIFIC GROWTH AND FITNESS IN CARRION CROWS (CORVUS CORONE CORONE) , 1989 .

[23]  W. Rice ANALYZING TABLES OF STATISTICAL TESTS , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[24]  Fred L. Bookstein,et al.  Morphometrics in Evolutionary Biology , 1988 .

[25]  B. Flury Common Principal Components and Related Multivariate Models , 1988 .

[26]  J. Cheverud,et al.  A COMPARISON OF GENETIC AND PHENOTYPIC CORRELATIONS , 1988, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[27]  Z. Zeng LONG‐TERM CORRELATED RESPONSE, INTERPOPULATION COVARIATION, AND INTERSPECIFIC ALLOMETRY , 1988, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[28]  D. Lofsvold,et al.  QUANTITATIVE GENETICS OF MORPHOLOGICAL DIFFERENTIATION IN PEROMYSCUS. II. ANALYSIS OF SELECTION AND DRIFT , 1988, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[29]  Bernhard Flury,et al.  Principal component analysis , 1988 .

[30]  P. Grant,et al.  Oscillating selection on Darwin's finches , 1987, Nature.

[31]  C. O'Connor An introduction to multivariate statistical analysis: 2nd edn. by T. W. Anderson. 675 pp. Wiley, New York (1984) , 1987 .

[32]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Morphometrics in Evolutionary Biology. , 1986 .

[33]  K. Somers MULTIVARIATE ALLOMETRY AND REMOVAL OF SIZE WITH PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS ANALYSIS , 1986 .

[34]  D. Schluter,et al.  Genetic and phenotypic correlations in a natural population of song sparrows , 1986 .

[35]  Dolph Schluter,et al.  NATURAL SELECTION ON BEAK AND BODY SIZE IN THE SONG SPARROW , 1986, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[36]  T. W. Anderson An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis, 2nd Edition. , 1985 .

[37]  B. Grant,et al.  SELECTION ON BILL CHARACTERS IN A POPULATION OF DARWIN'S FINCHES: GEOSPIZA CONIROSTRIS ON ISLA GENOVESA, GALÁPAGOS , 1985, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[38]  Günter P. Wagner,et al.  On the eigenvalue distribution of genetic and phenotypic dispersion matrices: Evidence for a nonrandom organization of quantitative character variation , 1984 .

[39]  A. Baker,et al.  Morphometric Variation in Introduced Populations of the Common Myna (Acridotheres tristis): An Application of the Jackknife to Principal Component Analysis , 1984 .

[40]  J. Cheverud,et al.  Quantitative genetics and developmental constraints on evolution by selection. , 1984, Journal of theoretical biology.

[41]  P. Grant Inheritance of size and shape in a population of Darwin’s finches, Geospiza conirostris , 1983, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[42]  P. Boag THE HERITABILITY OF EXTERNAL MORPHOLOGY IN DARWIN'S GROUND FINCHES (GEOSPIZA) ON ISLA DAPHNE MAJOR, GALÁPAGOS , 1983, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[43]  P. Handford CONTINENTAL PATTERNS OF MORPHOLOGICAL VARIATION IN A SOUTH AMERICAN SPARROW , 1983, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[44]  J. Cheverud PHENOTYPIC, GENETIC, AND ENVIRONMENTAL MORPHOLOGICAL INTEGRATION IN THE CRANIUM , 1982, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[45]  P. Grant,et al.  Intense Natural Selection in a Population of Darwin's Finches (Geospizinae) in the Gal�pagos , 1981, Science.

[46]  R. Lande,et al.  Genetic Variation and Phenotypic Evolution During Allopatric Speciation , 1980, The American Naturalist.

[47]  R. Lande QUANTITATIVE GENETIC ANALYSIS OF MULTIVARIATE EVOLUTION, APPLIED TO BRAIN:BODY SIZE ALLOMETRY , 1979, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[48]  R. Lande NATURAL SELECTION AND RANDOM GENETIC DRIFT IN PHENOTYPIC EVOLUTION , 1976, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[49]  H. Grüneberg,et al.  Introduction to quantitative genetics , 1960 .

[50]  C. Pigott Genetics and the Origin of Species , 1959, Nature.

[51]  T. W. Anderson,et al.  An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 1959 .

[52]  E. Reeve Genetical aspects of size allometry , 1950, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B - Biological Sciences.

[53]  S. Wright General, Group and Special Size Factors. , 1932, Genetics.