Managing User Capabilities in Information Systems Life Cycle: Conceptual Modeling

Information Systems (IS) acquisition prescribes induction of information technologies (IT) in the organization. At times, IS is used for managing broader enterprise level issues like implementing e-business, e-commerce. Enterprise level issues are addressed through adequate involvement of people in the organization which are termed as “user capabilities”. Managing user capabilities is critical since their roles are very important in the entire Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC). It is seen that failures in IT acquisition are not because of the technology, but failure in choosing it rightly, and poor user capabilities. If planned properly, user capabilities can contribute effectively to SDLC. SDLC works in stages with different sets of users and insensitivities to users contribute to the gap between satisfying organizational needs and end-user deliveries. This problem can be addressed by carefully integrating user capability issues in the SDLC process. In this paper a framework is suggested to capture user capabilities in an IT acquiring organization. User capabilities are identified in two categories: IT users who are IT experts and involved in design, development, and implementation of SDLC driven projects, and, second, non-IT users who, despite having inadequate or no exposure to IT, contribute to SDLC driven projects. The framework is implemented through Unified Modelling Language (UML) based approach. A case discusses the utility of this approach. DOR:  98.1000/1726-8125.2017.15.39.0.1.77.103

[1]  Pankaj Jalote,et al.  CMM in Practice: Processes for Executing Software Projects at Infosys , 1999 .

[2]  Dov Te'eni,et al.  Integrating Human-Computer Interaction Development into the Systems Development Life Cycle: A Methodology , 2005, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Eric T. G. Wang,et al.  Factors affecting information systems planning effectiveness: organizational contexts and planning systems dimensions , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[4]  Jerry N. Luftman Assessing It/Business Alignment , 2003, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[5]  Dean Leffingwell,et al.  Scaling Software Agility: Best Practices for Large Enterprises (The Agile Software Development Series) , 2007 .

[6]  Rob Kling,et al.  Reconceptualizing Users as Social Actors in Information Systems Research , 2003, MIS Q..

[7]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Measuring Information Systems Service Quality: Lessons From Two Longitudinal Case Studies , 1998, MIS Q..

[8]  Claes Wohlin,et al.  Experimentation in software engineering: an introduction , 2000 .

[9]  Graham Pervan,et al.  How chief executive officers in large organizations view the management of their information systems , 1998, J. Inf. Technol..

[10]  Bashar Nuseibeh,et al.  Requirements engineering: a roadmap , 2000, ICSE '00.

[11]  Peter Weill,et al.  Firm Context and Patterns of IT Infrastructure Capability (Best Paper Award) , 1996, ICIS.

[12]  Martin Harris,et al.  Strategic planning for information systems , 1991, J. Inf. Technol..

[13]  Mary Shaw,et al.  Software architecture - perspectives on an emerging discipline , 1996 .

[14]  Lars Mathiassen,et al.  The post mortem paradox: a Delphi study of IT specialist perceptions , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Barry Boehm,et al.  The Spiral Model as a Tool for Evolutionary Acquisition , 2001 .

[16]  Barry W. Boehm,et al.  COTS-Based Systems Top 10 List , 2001, Computer.

[17]  Jon Heales,et al.  Reliability factors in business software: volatility, requirements and end-users , 2002, Inf. Syst. J..

[18]  Robert B. Grady,et al.  Practical Software Metrics for Project Management and Process Improvement , 1992 .

[19]  Nicole Fruehauf Information Systems Requirements Determination And Analysis , 2016 .

[20]  John McHugh,et al.  Life-Cycle Models for Survivable Systems , 2002 .

[21]  Ivar Jacobson,et al.  The unified modeling language reference manual , 2010 .

[22]  Stephen J. Mellor,et al.  Executable UML - A Foundation for Model-Driven Architecture , 2002, Addison Wesley object technology series.

[23]  C. Sophie Lee,et al.  Modeling the business value of information technology , 2001, Inf. Manag..

[24]  H. Misra,et al.  Users’ computer human interface capabilities in information system development life cycle: An organizational perspective , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference.

[25]  Frank F. Land A contingency based approach to requirements elicitation and systems development , 1998, J. Syst. Softw..

[26]  Awie Leonard,et al.  A conceptual framework for explaining the value of end user maturity levels for IT management , 2005 .

[27]  Corinne M. Karuppan,et al.  Resilience of super users’ mental models of enterprise-wide systems , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[28]  M. Berry,et al.  Managing technology and innovation: a review , 1994 .

[29]  Bennet P. Lientz,et al.  Assessing the impact of new technology in information systems , 1981 .