Performance of the Lead-Alloy-Cooled Reactor Concept Balanced for Actinide Burning and Electricity Production

Abstract A lead-bismuth–cooled fast reactor concept targeted for a balanced mission of actinide burning and low-cost electricity production is proposed and its performance analyzed. The design explores the potential benefits of thorium-based fuel in actinide-burning cores, in particular in terms of the reduction of the large reactivity swing and enhancement of the small Doppler coefficient typical of fertile-free actinide burners. Reduced electricity production cost is pursued through a longer cycle length than that used for fertile-free burners and thus a higher capacity factor. It is shown that the concept can achieve a high transuranics destruction rate, which is only 20% lower than that of an accelerator-driven system with fertile-free fuel. The small negative fuel temperature reactivity coefficient, small positive coolant temperature reactivity coefficient, and negative core radial expansion coefficient provide self-regulating characteristics so that the reactor is capable of inherent shutdown during major transients without scram, as in the Integral Fast Reactor. This is confirmed by thermal-hydraulic analysis of several transients without scram, including primary coolant pump trip, station blackout, and reactivity step insertion, which showed that the reactor was able to meet all identified thermal limits. However, the benefits of high actinide consumption and small reactivity swing can be attained only if the uranium from the discharged fuel is separated and not recycled. This additional uranium separation step and thorium reprocessing significantly increase the fuel cycle costs. Because the higher fuel cycle cost has a larger impact on the overall cost of electricity than the savings from the higher capacity factor afforded through use of thorium, this concept appears less promising than the fertile-free actinide burners.

[1]  C. A. Wemple,et al.  MOCUP: MCNP-ORIGEN2 coupled utility program , 1995 .

[2]  E. K. Fujita,et al.  Physics Studies of Weapons Plutonium Disposition in the Integral Fast Reactor Closed Fuel Cycle , 1995 .

[3]  D. Wade,et al.  The Integral Fast Reactor Concept: Physics of Operation and Safety , 1988 .

[4]  Robert Hill,et al.  Development of small, fast reactor core designs using lead-based coolant. , 1999 .

[5]  Yacine Kadi,et al.  Fast neutron incineration in the energy amplifier as alternative to geologic storage: The Case of Spain , 1997 .

[6]  R. A. Wigeland,et al.  Radial core expansion reactivity feedback in advanced LMRs: uncertainties and their effects on inherent safety , 1988 .

[7]  Neil E. Todreas,et al.  Design Strategy and Constraints for Medium-Power Lead-Alloy–Cooled Actinide Burners , 2004 .

[8]  Marcus Eriksson,et al.  Reliability Assessment of the LANSCE Accelerator System , 1999 .

[9]  D. C. Hill,et al.  The U.S. accelerator transmutation of waste program , 2001 .

[10]  Michael Todosow,et al.  A Pressurized Water Reactor Plutonium Incinerator Based on Thorium Fuel and Seed-Blanket Assembly Geometry , 2000 .

[11]  Neil E. Todreas,et al.  Medium-Power Lead-Alloy Reactors: Missions for This Reactor Technology , 2004 .

[12]  R. A. Wigeland,et al.  The safety of the IFR , 1997 .

[13]  Ulrich Fischer,et al.  Development of Methods for Calculation of Deuteron-Lithium and Neutron-Lithium Cross Sections for Energies up to 50 MeV , 2001 .

[14]  D. P. Weber,et al.  SAS4A LMFBR whole core accident analysis code , 1985 .

[15]  Mujid S. Kazimi,et al.  Conceptual Reactor Physics Design of a Lead-Bismuth-Cooled Critical Actinide Burner , 2000 .

[16]  Mujid S. Kazimi,et al.  Use of Thorium for Transmutation of Plutonium and Minor Actinides in PWRs , 2004 .

[17]  R. A. Wigeland Effect of a detailed radial core expansion reactivity feedback model on ATWS calculations using SASSYS/SAS4A , 1986 .

[18]  Neil E. Todreas,et al.  Core power limits for a lead-bismuth natural circulation actinide burner reactor , 2002 .

[19]  Carlo Rubbia,et al.  Conceptual design of a fast neutron operated high power energy amplifier , 1995 .

[20]  James E. Cahalan,et al.  Performance of metal and oxide fuel cores during accidents in large liquid-metal-cooled reactors , 1992 .

[22]  C. Rubbia,et al.  required when the detailed design study of the Energy Amplifier is completed and subsequently when neutron operated High Power Energy Amplifier. Obviously, more elaborated economic studies are , 1995 .

[23]  Cliff B. Davis,et al.  Thermal-Hydraulic Analyses of Transients in an Actinide-Burner Reactor Cooled by Forced Convection of Lead Bismuth , 2003 .

[24]  Cliff Bybee Davis,et al.  Overview of the Use of ATHENA for Thermal-Hydraulic Analysis of Systems with Lead-Bismuth Coolant , 2000 .

[25]  A. G. Croff,et al.  User's manual for the ORIGEN2 computer code , 1980 .

[26]  E. K. Fujita,et al.  Trends Versus Reactor Size of Passive Reactivity Shutdown and Control Performance , 1989 .

[27]  Neil E. Todreas,et al.  Fertile-Free Fast Lead-Cooled Incinerators for Efficient Actinide Burning , 2004 .

[28]  Robert Hill,et al.  The design rationale of the IFR , 1997 .

[29]  Cliff Bybee Davis,et al.  Design of an Actinide-Burning, Lead or Lead-Bismuth Cooled Reactor that Produces Low-Cost Electricity , 2000 .

[30]  J. F. Briesmeister MCNP-A General Monte Carlo N-Particle Transport Code , 1993 .