Deregulation and the competitive fringe: Owner-operators in the trucking industry

This paper assesses the direct and indirect effects of regulatory reform in the trucking industry on the employment of owner-operators. We utilize a probit estimation form derived from driver utility functions to estimate the change in the probability that a truck driver is an owner-operator following deregulation.We find that a representative driver with mean characteristics is 155.6 percent more likely to choose employment as an owner-operator in the deregulated environment. Thirty-six percentage points of this increase is due to the indirect effects of deregulation, which operate primarily through changes in wage differentials and unionization. The direct effect of deregulation accounts for a 120% increase in the probability of a driver choosing employment as an owner-operator.

[1]  D. Wyckoff,et al.  Truck drivers in America , 1979 .

[2]  K. Boyer DEREGULATION OF THE TRUCKING SECTOR: SPECIALIZATION, CONCENTRATION, ENTRY, AND FINANCIAL DISTRESS. , 1993 .

[3]  Theodore E. Keeler,et al.  Pricing in a Deregulated Environment: The Motor Carrier Experience , 1991 .

[4]  John S. Ying REGULATORY REFORM AND TECHNICAL CHANGE -- NEW EVIDENCE OF SCALE ECONOMICS IN TRUCKING , 1990 .

[5]  Theodore E. Keeler,et al.  Deregulation and Scale Economies in the U. S. Trucking Industry: An Econometric Extension of the Survivor Principle , 1989, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[6]  Thomas M. Corsi,et al.  ATLFS: DRIVING OWNER-OPERATORS INTO THE SUNSET , 1989 .

[7]  D. Daryl Wyckoff,et al.  The owner-operator, independent trucker , 1975 .

[8]  B. Starr McMullen,et al.  THE IMPACT OF DEREGULATION ON THE PRODUCTION STRUCTURE OF THE MOTOR CARRIER INDUSTRY , 1988 .

[9]  D. Maister Management of owner-operator fleets , 1980 .

[10]  N. Rose The incidence of regulatory rents in the motor carrier industry , 1985 .

[11]  Nancy L. Rose,et al.  Labor Rent Sharing and Regulation: Evidence from the Trucking Industry , 1987, Journal of Political Economy.

[12]  M. Agar,et al.  Independents Declared: The Dilemmas of Independent Trucking. , 1987 .

[13]  C. Perry,et al.  Deregulation and the decline of the unionized trucking industry , 1988 .

[14]  Orley Ashenfelter,et al.  An Experimental Comparison of Dispute Rates in Alternative Arbitration Systems , 1990 .

[15]  A A Marcus FROM MARKET DOMINANCE TO CREDIBLE COMMITMENTS : SHIPPERS' STRATEGIES IN A DEREGULATED TRUCKING ENVIRONMENT , 1987 .

[16]  T. G. Moore The Beneficiaries of Trucking Regulation , 1978, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[17]  Hurvey Leibenstein Allocative efficiency vs. X-Efficiency , 1966 .

[18]  T M Corsi,et al.  EFFECTS OF DEREGULATED ENVIRONMENT ON MOTOR CARRIERS: A SYSTEMATIC, MULTISEGMENTED ANALYSIS , 1991 .

[19]  John S. Ying The Inefficiency of Regulating a Competitive Industry: Productivity Gains in Trucking Following Reform , 1990 .