Parameter estimates for invasive breast cancer progression in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study

Background:The aim of screening is to detect a cancer in the preclinical state. However, a false-positive or a false-negative test result is a real possibility.Methods:We describe invasive breast cancer progression in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study and construct progression models with and without covariates. The effect of risk factors on transition intensities and false-negative probability is investigated. We estimate the transition rates, the sojourn time and sensitivity of diagnostic tests for women aged 40–49 and 50–59.Results:Although younger women have a slower transition rate from healthy state to preclinical, their screen-detected tumour becomes evident sooner. Women aged 50–59 have a higher mortality rate compared with younger women. The mean sojourn times for women aged 40–49 and 50–59 are 2.5 years (95% CI: 1.7, 3.8) and 3.0 years (95% CI: 2.1, 4.3), respectively. Sensitivity of diagnostic procedures for older women is estimated to be 0.75 (95% CI: 0.55, 0.88), while women aged 40–49 have a lower sensitivity (0.61, 95% CI: 0.42, 0.77). Age is the only factor that affects the false-negative probability. For women aged 40–49, ‘age at entry’, ‘history of breast disease’ and ‘families with breast cancer’ are found to be significant for some of the transition rates. For the age-group 50–59, ‘age at entry’, ‘history of breast disease’, ‘menstruation length’ and ‘number of live births’ are found to affect the transition rates.Conclusion:Modelling and estimating the parameters of cancer progression are essential steps towards evaluating the effectiveness of screening policies. The parameters include the transition rates, the preclinical sojourn time, the sensitivity, and the effect of different risk factors on cancer progression.

[1]  U. P. S. T. Force Genetic Risk Assessment and BRCA Mutation Testing for Breast and Ovarian Cancer Susceptibility: Recommendation Statement , 2005, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[2]  Odd O Aalen,et al.  Estimating mean sojourn time and screening sensitivity using questionnaire data on time since previous screening , 2008, Journal of medical screening.

[3]  Simon G. Thompson,et al.  Multistate Markov models for disease progression with classification error , 2003 .

[4]  Odd O Aalen,et al.  Estimating mean sojourn time and screening test sensitivity in breast cancer mammography screening: new results , 2005, Journal of medical screening.

[5]  Tony Hsiu-Hsi Chen,et al.  Assessing chronic disease progression using non‐homogeneous exponential regression Markov models: an illustration using a selective breast cancer screening in Taiwan , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[6]  D. Schopper,et al.  How effective are breast cancer screening programmes by mammography? Review of the current evidence. , 2009, European journal of cancer.

[7]  A. Miller,et al.  Estimation of age‐specific sensitivity and sojourn time in breast cancer screening studies , 2005, Statistics in medicine.

[8]  S. Duffy,et al.  Overdiagnosis, Sojourn Time, and Sensitivity in the Copenhagen Mammography Screening Program , 2006, The breast journal.

[9]  M Zelen,et al.  Screening sensitivity and sojourn time from breast cancer early detection clinical trials: mammograms and physical examinations. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  Robert A. Smith,et al.  IARC Handbooks of Cancer Prevention, Volume 7: Breast Cancer Screening , 2003, Breast Cancer Research.

[11]  S. Duffy,et al.  Estimating sensitivity and sojourn time in screening for colorectal cancer: a comparison of statistical approaches. , 1998, American journal of epidemiology.

[12]  A. Miller,et al.  Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 1. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 40 to 49 years. , 1992, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[13]  L. Tabár,et al.  Markov models of breast tumor progression: some age-specific results. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[14]  A. Jardine,et al.  Incidence of invasive breast cancer in the presence of competing mortality: the Canadian National Breast Screening Study , 2012, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[15]  Christopher H. Jackson,et al.  Multi-State Models for Panel Data: The msm Package for R , 2011 .

[16]  A. Jardine,et al.  Predictors of competing mortality to invasive breast cancer incidence in the Canadian National Breast Screening study , 2012, BMC Cancer.

[17]  A. Miller,et al.  Canadian National Breast Screening Study-2: 13-year results of a randomized trial in women aged 50-59 years. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[18]  Timothy J Wilt,et al.  Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. , 2009, Annals of internal medicine.

[19]  J. E. Ruiz-Castro,et al.  A piecewise Markov process for analysing survival from breast cancer in different risk groups. , 2001, Statistics in medicine.

[20]  D. Dudgeon,et al.  Multistate analysis of interval-censored longitudinal data: application to a cohort study on performance status among patients diagnosed with cancer. , 2011, American journal of epidemiology.

[21]  T. Prevost,et al.  Evaluation of a selective screening for colorectal carcinoma , 1999, Cancer.

[22]  L. Tabár,et al.  Sojourn time, sensitivity and positive predictive value of mammography screening for breast cancer in women aged 40-49. , 1996, International journal of epidemiology.

[23]  Timothy J Wilt,et al.  Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. , 2009, Annals of internal medicine.

[24]  T. Wilt,et al.  Breast cancer screening: from science to recommendation. , 2010, Radiology.

[25]  T. Chen,et al.  Mixture Multi-state Markov Regression Model , 2007 .

[26]  G. Brock,et al.  Estimating key parameters in periodic breast cancer screening-application to the Canadian National Breast Screening Study data. , 2010, Cancer epidemiology.

[27]  N. Bartolomeo,et al.  Progression of liver cirrhosis to HCC: an application of hidden Markov model , 2011, BMC medical research methodology.

[28]  T. To,et al.  The Canadian National Breast Screening Study-1: Breast Cancer Mortality after 11 to 16 Years of Follow-up: A Randomized Screening Trial of Mammography in Women Age 40 to 49 Years , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[29]  H. Nelson,et al.  Screening for Breast Cancer: An Update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force , 2009, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[30]  A. Miller,et al.  Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 2. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 50 to 59 years. , 1992, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[31]  L. Tabár,et al.  Evaluation by Markov chain models of a non-randomised breast cancer screening programme in women aged under 50 years in Sweden. , 1998, Journal of epidemiology and community health.