The role of interaction in native speaker comprehension of nonnative speaker speech

Interaction has often been shown to have a positive effect on nonnative speakers' (NNS) comprehension of their second language (L2). Based on the fact that interaction gives learners an opportunity to modify their speech upon a signal of noncomprehension, it should also have a positive effect on native speakers' (NS) comprehension of NNSs. However, in a 1994 study, Gass and Varonis did not find that interaction led to better comprehension of NNSs by NSs in an information gap task. Because such a result has important implications for theory and practice, the present study attempted to replicate their results. Thirty dyads performed an information gap activity with and without interaction. The results show that interaction does indeed help NSs comprehend NNSs. This article discusses various reasons for the discrepancy between the results obtained in the Gass and Varonis study and those from the present study as well as the implications of this study for research methodology.

[1]  E. Schegloff,et al.  A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation , 1974 .

[2]  Michael H. Long.  INPUT, INTERACTION, AND SECOND‐LANGUAGE ACQUISITION , 1981 .

[3]  S. Gass,et al.  The comprehensibility of non-native speech , 1982, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[4]  Michael H. Long.  Linguistic and Conversational Adjustments to Non-Native Speakers , 1983, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[5]  Evangeline Marlos Varonis,et al.  The Effect Of Familiarity On The Comprehensibility Of Nonnative Speech , 1984 .

[6]  Evangeline Marlos Varonis,et al.  Non-native/Non-native Conversations: A Model for Negotiation of Meaning , 1985 .

[7]  M. Swain.  Communicative competence : Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development , 1985 .

[8]  T. Pica.  Interlanguage Adjustments as an Outcome of NS‐NNS Negotiated Interaction , 1988 .

[9]  T. Pica,et al.  Comprehensible Output as an Outcome of Linguistic Demands on the Learner , 1989, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[10]  Evangeline Marlos Varonis,et al.  Incorporated Repairs in Nonnative Discourse , 1989 .

[11]  S. Krashen.  We Acquire Vocabulary and Spelling by Reading: Additional Evidence for the Input Hypothesis , 1989 .

[12]  Michael H. Long,et al.  An introduction to second language acquisition research , 1990 .

[13]  Susan M. Gass,et al.  Second Language Acquisition: An Introductory Course , 1995 .

[14]  Susan M. Gass,et al.  Input, Interaction, and Second Language Production , 1994, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[15]  T. Pica.  Research on Negotiation: What Does It Reveal about Second-Language Learning Conditions, Processes, and Outcomes?. , 1994 .

[16]  Masanori Matsumura.  Japanese Learners' Acquisition of the Locality Requirement of English Reflexives , 1994, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[17]  Rod Ellis,et al.  The Study of Second Language Acquisition , 1994 .

[18]  Susan M. Gass,et al.  Input, interaction, and the second language learner , 1994 .

[19]  M. Swain.  Three functions of output in second language learning , 1995 .

[20]  K. Bot.  The Psycholinguistics of the Output Hypothesis , 1996 .

[21]  M. Swain,et al.  Interaction and Second Language Learning: Two Adolescent French Immersion Students Working Together , 1998 .