Classification of unexploded ordnance

In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the head of my department or by his or her representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Date Abstract ii Abstract In this thesis I investigate methods for discriminating between unexploded ordnances (UXOs) and clutter items (e.g: shrapnel, geology). I first describe a numerical forward model, the method of auxiliary sources (MAS), which can be used to model the magnetic and electromagnetic response of a conductive, permeable body. I use this model to validate the connection between the parameters of approximate forward models and target properties (i.e target shape). I also examine how model parameters can be estimated from observed data using inversion. I then describe algorithms for discriminating between UXO and clutter. In the statistical classification framework, model parameters are basis vectors within a multi-dimensional feature space. I prioritize features based upon their ability to separate UXO and clutter using canonical analysis. I describe two approaches for partitioning the feature space: modelling the underlying distributions from which the observed feature data are drawn, or directly defining a decision boundary. A suite of statistical classifiers are then applied to magnetics data acquired at three field sites. Finally, I propose an algorithm for selecting a classifier as target excavation proceeds.

[1]  John E. Dennis,et al.  Numerical methods for unconstrained optimization and nonlinear equations , 1983, Prentice Hall series in computational mathematics.

[2]  Robert F. Butler,et al.  Paleomagnetism: Magnetic Domains to Geologic Terranes , 1991 .

[3]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Statistical Pattern Recognition: A Review , 2000, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[4]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  On Discriminative vs. Generative Classifiers: A comparison of logistic regression and naive Bayes , 2001, NIPS.

[5]  G. W. Hohmann,et al.  4. Electromagnetic Theory for Geophysical Applications , 1987 .

[6]  R. Gittins,et al.  Canonical Analysis: A Review with Applications in Ecology , 1985 .

[7]  S. Dosso Quantifying uncertainty in geoacoustic inversion. I. A fast Gibbs sampler approach. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Walter L. Anderson,et al.  Computer program; numerical integration of related Hankel transforms of orders O and 1 by adaptive digital filtering , 1979 .

[9]  John E McFee Electromagnetic Remote Sensing. Low Frequency Electromagnetics , 1989 .

[10]  Peter G. Lelièvre,et al.  Forward modelling and inversion of geophysical magnetic data , 2003 .

[11]  James R. Wait,et al.  Quasi-Static Transient Response of a Conducting Permeable Sphere , 1969 .

[12]  D. Marquardt An Algorithm for Least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameters , 1963 .

[13]  W. Menke Geophysical data analysis : discrete inverse theory , 1984 .

[14]  Leslie M. Collins,et al.  A comparison of the performance of statistical and fuzzy algorithms for unexploded ordnance detection , 2001, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[15]  James R. McDonald,et al.  Using physics-based modeler outputs to train probabilistic neural networks for unexploded ordnance (UXO) classification in magnetometry surveys , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[16]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Pattern Recognition and Neural Networks , 1995 .

[17]  F. A. Seiler,et al.  Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing , 1989 .

[18]  L. Peters,et al.  Buried unexploded ordnance identification via complex natural resonances , 1997 .

[19]  Stephen D. Billings,et al.  Discrimination and classification of buried unexploded ordnance using magnetometry , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[20]  Douglas W. Oldenburg,et al.  3-D inversion of magnetic data , 1996 .

[21]  Y. Das,et al.  Analysis of an electromagnetic induction detector for real-time location of buried objects , 1990 .

[22]  Leslie M. Collins,et al.  Sensing of unexploded ordnance with magnetometer and induction data: theory and signal processing , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[23]  Irma Shamatava,et al.  Theoretical analysis and range of validity of TSA formulation for application to UXO discrimination , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[24]  William Stafford Noble,et al.  Support vector machine classification on the web , 2004, Bioinform..

[25]  Lionel Tarassenko,et al.  Estimations of error bounds for neural-network function approximators , 1999, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[26]  Stanley H. Ward UNIQUE DETERMINATION OF CONDUCTIVITY, SUSCEPTIBILITY, SIZE, AND DEPTH IN MULTIFREQUENCY ELECTROMAGNETIC EXPLORATION* , 1959 .

[27]  Bruce Barrow,et al.  Model-based characterization of electromagnetic induction signatures obtained with the MTADS electromagnetic array , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[28]  Leonard R. Pasion,et al.  Inversion of magnetics for UXO discrimination and identification , 2002 .

[29]  Leonard R. Pasion,et al.  Discrimination and Identification of UXO by Geophysical Inversion. Phase II: Inversion of Total-Field Magnetics , 2002 .

[30]  P. Legendre,et al.  Developments in Numerical Ecology , 1988 .

[31]  L. Pasion,et al.  DETECTING UNEXPLODED ORDNANCE WITH TIME DOMAIN ELECTROMAGNETIC INDUCTION , 1999 .

[32]  Stephen J. Norton,et al.  Identification of buried unexploded ordnance from broadband electromagnetic induction data , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[33]  Bill Delaney,et al.  Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Unexploded Ordnance , 2003 .

[34]  Kevin O'Neill Ultra-Wideband Electromagnetic Induction for UXO Discrimination , 2002 .

[35]  D. Ruppert The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction , 2004 .