Alternative definitions of high risk for impaired driving: the overlap of high volume, frequent heavy drinking and alcohol dependence.

This paper examines the distributions of past-year volume of ethanol intake, frequency of drinking 5+ drinks and alcohol dependence in a representative sample of 18,352 U.S. current drinkers aged 18 years or over. Within categories defined by these three partially overlapping domains, it presents rates of self-perceived impaired driving, i.e. driving after having had too much to drink, in the year preceding interview. High volume drinkers, those with an average daily ethanol intake of 1 ounce or more, composed 19.7% of current drinkers and accounted for 66.5% of all reported ethanol consumption, 72.6% of all heavy drinking days, 49.2% of all alcohol dependence and 62.8% of all impaired driving incidents. Frequent heavy drinkers, those who drank 5+ drinks at least once a week, composed 12.3% of current drinkers and accounted for 42.9% of all reported ethanol consumption, 81.9% of all heavy drinking days, 40% of all alcohol dependence and 57% of all impaired driving incidents. Drinkers with DSM-IV alcohol dependence composed 9.9% of current drinkers and accounted for 28.9% of all reported ethanol consumption, 37% of all heavy drinking days and 56.9% of all impaired driving incidents. The overlap of these three high risk groups, each of which had a probability of at least one impaired driving incident per year, was far from complete. Of individuals who met any of these criteria for high risk drinking (i.e. high volume, frequent heavy drinking or dependence), more than half met only one criterion and only one in seven met all three. The group that did meet all three criteria had such a high rate of impaired driving incidents, an average of 5.14/year, that it accounted for 36.4% of all such incidents despite making up only 3.8% of all current drinkers. The results are discussed in terms of their implications for targeting prevention and intervention efforts, e.g. whether targeting one problematic aspect of drinking behavior will reach drinkers with other types of problem behaviors as well.

[1]  B. Grant,et al.  Prevalence of DSM-IV Alcohol Abuse and Dependence , 1994, Alcohol health and research world.

[2]  B. Saunders,et al.  Alcohol and other drugs: the prevention paradoxes. , 2010, Community health studies.

[3]  B. Grant,et al.  The Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview schedule (AUDADIS): reliability of alcohol and drug modules in a general population sample. , 1995, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[4]  T. Norström,et al.  Prevention strategies and alcohol policy. , 1995, Addiction.

[5]  J. D. Lint Alcohol and Public Policy: Beyond the Shadow of Prohibition , 1984 .

[6]  M. Hilton,et al.  Alcohol in America : drinking practices and problems , 1992 .

[7]  A. W. Kemp,et al.  Kendall's Advanced Theory of Statistics. , 1994 .

[8]  O J Skog,et al.  The collectivity of drinking cultures: a theory of the distribution of alcohol consumption. , 1985, British journal of addiction.

[9]  J. Fleiss Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1974 .

[10]  C. Turner,et al.  How much alcohol is in a 'standard drink'? An analysis of 125 studies. , 1990, British journal of addiction.

[11]  L. Midanik The validity of self-reported alcohol consumption and alcohol problems: a literature review. , 1982, British journal of addiction.

[12]  J. Mundt,et al.  Validation of daily self-reported alcohol consumption using interactive voice response (IVR) technology. , 1995, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[13]  W. Kling Measurement of ethanol consumed in distilled spirits. , 1989, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[14]  J. Rehm,et al.  Measuring quantity, frequency, and volume of drinking. , 1998, Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research.

[15]  L. Schmidt,et al.  Assessing bias in community-based prevalence estimates: towards an unduplicated count of problem drinkers and drug users. , 1995, Addiction.

[16]  L. Midanik Comparing usual quantity/frequency and graduated frequency scales to assess yearly alcohol consumption: results from the 1990 US National Alcohol Survey. , 1994, Addiction.

[17]  N. Kreitman,et al.  Alcohol consumption and the preventive paradox. , 1986, British journal of addiction.

[18]  P Rydon,et al.  Unravelling the preventive paradox for acute alcohol problems. , 1996, Drug and alcohol review.

[19]  D A Dawson,et al.  Reducing alcohol-use disorders via decreased consumption: a comparison of population and high-risk strategies. , 1996, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[20]  T. Greenfield,et al.  Who drinks most of the alcohol in the US? The policy implications. , 1999, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[21]  B. Grant,et al.  Subgroup variation in U.S. drinking patterns: results of the 1992 national longitudinal alcohol epidemiologic study. , 1995, Journal of substance abuse.

[22]  M. Grossman,et al.  Effects of Alcoholic Beverage Prices and Legal Drinking Ages on Youth Alcohol Use , 1988, The Journal of Law and Economics.