Hypothesis testing in distributed source models for EEG and MEG data

Hypothesis testing in distributed source models for the electro‐ or magnetoencephalogram is generally performed for each voxel separately. Derived from the analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging data, such a statistical parametric map (SPM) ignores the spatial smoothing in hypothesis testing with distributed source models. For example, when intending to test a single voxel, actually an entire region of voxels is tested simultaneously. Because there are more parameters than observations, typically constraints are employed to arrive at a solution which spatially smooths the solution. If ignored, it can be concluded from the hypothesis test that there is activity at some location where there is none. In addition, an SPM on distributed source models gives the illusion of very high resolution. As an alternative, a multivariate approach is suggested in which a region of interest is tested that is spatially smooth. In simulations with MEG and EEG it is shown that clear hypothesis testing in distributed source models is possible, provided that there is high correspondence between what is intended to be tested and what is actually tested. The approach is also illustrated by an application to data from an experiment measuring visual evoked fields when presenting checkerboard patterns. Hum Brain Mapp, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain , 1993 .

[2]  Josef Schmee,et al.  An introduction to applied multivariate statistics , 1984 .

[3]  G. Wahba,et al.  A GENERALIZED APPROXIMATE CROSS VALIDATION FOR SMOOTHING SPLINES WITH NON-GAUSSIAN DATA , 1996 .

[4]  J. Leon Kenemans,et al.  Selective attention to spatial frequency: an ERP and source localization analysis , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[5]  S. Gonzalez-Andino,et al.  A critical analysis of linear inverse solutions to the neuroelectromagnetic inverse problem , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  Micah M. Murray,et al.  Improving the performance of linear inverse solutions by inverting the resolution matrix , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric mapping for event-related potentials (II): a hierarchical temporal model , 2004, NeuroImage.

[8]  W. Menke Geophysical data analysis : discrete inverse theory , 1984 .

[9]  D. S. Tracy,et al.  Generalized Inverse Matrices: With Applications to Statistics , 1971 .

[10]  R.P.P.P. Grasman,et al.  Sensor array signal processing and the neuro-electromagnetic inverse problem in functional connectivity analysis of the brain , 2004 .

[11]  G. Barnes,et al.  Statistical flattening of MEG beamformer images , 2003, Human brain mapping.

[12]  E. Halgren,et al.  Dynamic Statistical Parametric Mapping Combining fMRI and MEG for High-Resolution Imaging of Cortical Activity , 2000, Neuron.

[13]  C M Michel,et al.  Spatiotemporal EEG analysis and distributed source estimation in presurgical epilepsy evaluation. , 1999, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[14]  Christoph M. Michel,et al.  Electrical neuroimaging based on biophysical constraints , 2004, NeuroImage.

[15]  John W Belliveau,et al.  Monte Carlo simulation studies of EEG and MEG localization accuracy , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[16]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric mapping for event-related potentials: I. Generic considerations , 2004, NeuroImage.

[17]  C. Michel,et al.  Linear inverse solutions with optimal resolution kernels applied to electromagnetic tomography , 1997, Human brain mapping.

[18]  M. Bilodeau,et al.  Theory of multivariate statistics , 1999 .

[19]  Sylvain Baillet,et al.  A Bayesian approach to introducing anatomo-functional priors in the EEG/MEG inverse problem , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  N. S. Urquhart,et al.  Generalized Inverse Matrices (with Applications to Statistics) , 1973 .

[21]  T. W. Anderson,et al.  An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 1959 .

[22]  Benoît Champagne,et al.  Statistical maps for EEG dipolar source localization , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[23]  G. R Mangun,et al.  On the processing of spatial frequencies as revealed by evoked-potential source modeling , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[24]  J.C. de Munck,et al.  A random dipole model for spontaneous brain activity , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[25]  A. Dale,et al.  Improved Localizadon of Cortical Activity by Combining EEG and MEG with MRI Cortical Surface Reconstruction: A Linear Approach , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[26]  Keith J. Worsley,et al.  Statistical analysis of activation images , 2001 .

[27]  R. Muirhead Aspects of Multivariate Statistical Theory , 1982, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics.

[28]  Adi Ben-Israel,et al.  Generalized inverses: theory and applications , 1974 .

[29]  Anja Vogler,et al.  An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 2004 .

[30]  Peter C. M. Molenaar,et al.  Model selection in electromagnetic source analysis with an application to VEFs , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[31]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  MEG-based imaging of focal neuronal current sources , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[32]  Aleksandar Dogandzic,et al.  Estimating evoked dipole responses in unknown spatially correlated noise with EEG/MEG arrays , 2000, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[33]  J.C. Mosher,et al.  Multiple dipole modeling and localization from spatio-temporal MEG data , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[34]  A. V. D. Vaart,et al.  Asymptotic Statistics: Frontmatter , 1998 .

[35]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Anatomically Informed Basis Functions for EEG Source Localization: Combining Functional and Anatomical Constraints , 2002, NeuroImage.

[36]  Per Christian Hansen,et al.  Analysis of Discrete Ill-Posed Problems by Means of the L-Curve , 1992, SIAM Rev..

[37]  D. Lehmann,et al.  Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: a new method for localizing electrical activity in the brain. , 1994, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.