CIO Herds and User Gangs in the Adoption of Open Source Software

Open Source Software (OSS) has received wide attention from the research community, analyzing both the innovation process of software development by distributed and unrelated teams, and the market dynamics at play between "free" and proprietary software. Up until now, OSS adoption has been irregular, although it seems to be breaking the dominance of existing players in some market segments. In this paper, we contend that due to the particularities of its development process, traditional ways of explaining IT adoption -rational decision making, technology diffusion models, and the psychology of the decision maker- are insufficient to explain the case of OSS diffusion. We believe that the existence of a strong and diffused development community leads to a new role of the user community, as both are intertwined. In addition, new concerns for social corporate responsibility and welfare create a new context, in which "user gangs" may exert some degrees of pressure on the IT decision maker. By analyzing some significant cases we depict under what conditions significant OSS adoption may unfold, showing that in two of the cases studied user gangs play a significant role. The resulting preliminary framework will inform future work, in which we aim at validating the emerging insights gained in this research.

[1]  Gabriel Szulanski,et al.  Diffusion of innovations within organizations: electronic switching in the Bell system , 1997 .

[2]  Chris F. Kemerer,et al.  The assimilation of software process innovations: an organizational learning perspective , 1997 .

[3]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[4]  Robert G. Fichman,et al.  Real Options and IT Platform Adoption: Implications for Theory and Practice , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[5]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Electronic Data Interchange and Small Organizations: Adoption and Impact of Technology , 1995, MIS Q..

[6]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  Satisfying Heterogeneous User Needs Via Innovation Toolkits: The Case of Apache Security Software , 2002 .

[7]  Ojelanki K. Ngwenyama,et al.  Communication Richness in Electronic Mail: Critical Social Theory and the Contextuality of Meaning , 1997, MIS Q..

[8]  J. Graham.  Herding Among Investment Newsletters: Theory and Evidence , 1998 .

[9]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[10]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  An Investigation of Media Selection Among Directors and Managers: From "Self" to "Other" Orientation , 1998, MIS Q..

[11]  R. Zmud,et al.  Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach , 1990 .

[12]  Alfred Taudes,et al.  Options Analysis of Software Platform Decisions: A Case Study , 2000, MIS Q..

[13]  J. Dedrick,et al.  WHY FIRMS ADOPT OPEN SOURCE PLATFORMS: A GROUNDED THEORY OF INNOVATION AND STANDARDS ADOPTION , 2003 .

[14]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Organizational Learning: A Theory Of Action Perspective , 1978 .

[15]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  Open Source Software and the "Private-Collective" Innovation Model: Issues for Organization Science , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[16]  Stefano Comino,et al.  Free/Open Source vs Closed Source Software: Public Policies in the Software Market , 2004 .

[17]  Geoffrey A. Moore.  Crossing the chasm : marketing and selling high-tech products to mainstream customers , 1999 .

[18]  M. Wade,et al.  Review: the resource-based view and information systems research: review, extension, and suggestions for future research , 2004 .

[19]  M. Markus,et al.  Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research , 1988 .

[20]  B DavisGordon,et al.  An investigation of media selection among directors and managers , 1998 .

[21]  Michael R. Wade,et al.  The Resource-Based View and Information Systems Research: Review, Extension, and Suggestions for Future Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[22]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  A Cross-Country Study of Electronic Business Adoption Using the Technology-Organization-Environment Framework , 2002, ICIS.

[23]  Linda S. Lotto.  Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods , 1986 .

[24]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Generalizing Generalizability in Information Systems Research , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[25]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Technology Adoption in the Presence of Network Externalities , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[26]  Eric S. Raymond,et al.  The cathedral and the bazaar , 1998, First Monday.

[27]  BenbasatIzak,et al.  Electronic data interchange and small organizations , 1995 .

[28]  A. Bonaccorsi,et al.  Why Open Source Software Can Succeed , 2002 .

[29]  Raghu Garud,et al.  An Empirical Evaluation of the Internal Corporate Venturing Process , 1992 .

[30]  Xiaotong Li,et al.  Informational cascades in IT adoption , 2004, CACM.

[31]  John Mingers,et al.  Combining IS Research Methods: Towards a Pluralist Methodology , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[32]  E. Hippel.  Sticky Information and the Locus of Problem Solving: Implications for Innovation , 1994 .

[33]  Hal R. Varian,et al.  Information rules - a strategic guide to the network economy , 1999 .

[34]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  The Emergence of Interpretivism in IS Research , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[35]  R. Grant.  The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation , 1991 .

[36]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Toward a “Critical Mass” Theory of Interactive Media , 1987 .

[37]  M. Markus.  Electronic Mail as the Medium of Managerial Choice , 1994 .

[38]  R. Kauffman.  PAYOFF EXTERNALITIES , INFORMATIONAL CASCADES AND MANAGERIAL INCENTIVES : A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK FOR IT ADOPTION HERDING , 2003 .

[39]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[40]  A. Langley.  Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data , 1999 .

[41]  B. Kogut,et al.  Capabilities as Real Options , 2001 .

[42]  Claudio U. Ciborra,et al.  Sharing knowledge across boundaries , 2001, J. Inf. Technol..

[43]  J. Laffont,et al.  The Theory of Incentives: The Principal-Agent Model , 2001 .

[44]  Michael Parent,et al.  Mimetic Isomorphism and Technology Evaluation: Does Imitation Transcend Judgment? , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[45]  G. Bethuyne.  The Timing of Technology Adoption by a Cost-minimizing Firm , 2002 .