Etiological agents of infections in neonatal intensive care units

Introduction: Neonatal or newborn period includes the first 28 days after the birth of a child. The immune sistem of a newborn is not fully developed and can not be completely effective oppose to pathogens which the infant can be exposed perinatally or in the period just before birth and seven days after. Goal : The aim of this study was to identify the most common causative agents of neonatal infections and the movement of infections through the observed period. Material and methods : This retrospective analytical study recruited 160 patients admitted to the Neonatology Department of the Cantonal Hospital „Dr Irfan Ljubijankic“ in Bihac, in the period from January 2013 to December 2014 on suspicion of neonatal infection. Results : Of 160 neonates suspected on neonatal infections in 123 (76,9%) was confirmed. Most neonates were admitted in the period from October to December 2013 (n=31, 19,4%). Most neonates with confirmed neonatal infection were admitted in the period from January to March 2013 (n=25, 20.3%). The most common diagnosis was Infectio perinatalis (n=57, 28,5%). Of the 87 isolated pathogens 65% (n=57) were Gram-positive, from which the most common were Staphylococcus aureus and MRSA 82,5% (n=47). Conclusion : Of the total number of neonates admitted on suspicion of neonatal infection, healing was result in 75% (n=120), neurological deficit in 18,1% (n=29), and the death in 6,9% (n=11) neonates. Keywords : neonates, Infectio perinatalis , Staphylococcus aureus , neurological deficit

[1]  J. Lawn,et al.  Treatment of neonatal infections: a multi-country analysis of health system bottlenecks and potential solutions , 2015, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

[2]  R. Black,et al.  Prevalence of early-onset neonatal infection among newborns of mothers with bacterial infection or colonization: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2015, BMC Infectious Diseases.

[3]  R. M. Ribas,et al.  Late onset sepsis in newborn babies: epidemiology and effect of a bundle to prevent central line associated bloodstream infections in the neonatal intensive care unit , 2014, The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases.

[4]  A. Levin,et al.  Non-Multidrug-Resistant, Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a Neonatal Unit , 2014, The Pediatric infectious disease journal.

[5]  A. Talati,et al.  Trends of Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections in a neonatal intensive care unit from 2000-2009 , 2014, BMC Pediatrics.

[6]  M. Laughon,et al.  Group B Streptococcus and Escherichia coli Infections in the Intensive Care Nursery in the Era of Intrapartum Antibiotic Prophylaxis , 2012, The Pediatric infectious disease journal.

[7]  M. Sharland,et al.  Surveillance swabbing for MRSA on neonatal intensive care units – is weekly nasal swabbing the best option? , 2012 .

[8]  N. Kennea,et al.  Neonatal infections in England: the NeonIN surveillance network , 2010, Archives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal and Neonatal Edition.

[9]  M. Triassi,et al.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a neonatal intensive care unit: molecular epidemiology and infection control measures , 2009, BMC infectious diseases.

[10]  R. Baltimore,et al.  Seventy-Five Years of Neonatal Sepsis at Yale: 1928–2003 , 2005, Pediatrics.

[11]  F. Huang,et al.  Neonatal sepsis in the neonatal intensive care unit: characteristics of early versus late onset. , 2004, Journal of microbiology, immunology, and infection = Wei mian yu gan ran za zhi.

[12]  S. Janković,et al.  Health care-acquired infections in neonatal intensive care units: risk factors and etiology. , 2015, American journal of infection control.