Drilling large diameter cross-measure boreholes to improve gas drainage in highly gassy soft coal seams

Abstract Reducing gas content via cross-measure boreholes is one of the primary gas control technologies in China, where most outburst-threat coal seams are soft and highly gassy. Regardless of the significant costs associated with drilling boreholes, the gas drainage rate remains low because of the low permeability of the soft coal seam and the small influence zone of a single borehole. In this paper, the effect of increasing borehole diameter on coal seam permeability is discussed and a new method for drilling large diameter cross-measure boreholes by using the water-jet technique is proposed. Numerical modeling results indicate that the plastic zone and the effective influence zone of one borehole expand as borehole diameter increases, and the interaction between adjacent boreholes is strengthened. The field test shows that when the borehole diameter is 1.0 m, the effective influence zone radius reaches 4 m which is 2.67 times larger than that of an ordinary borehole. After using the new method, the number of cross-measure boreholes per hundred meters and the length of cross-measure boreholes per meter can reduce by 32.5% and 42.9%, respectively. In addition, the gas drainage rate reaches 52.1%, and the monthly excavation length of coal roadway increases from 50–70 m to 109 m.

[1]  K. Elewaut,et al.  Application of X-ray computed tomography for analyzing cleat spacing and cleat aperture in coal samples , 2006 .

[2]  I. Gray,et al.  Reservoir Engineering in Coal Seams: Part 1-The Physical Process of Gas Storage and Movement in Coal Seams , 1987 .

[3]  Wei Li,et al.  Damage and Permeability Development in Coal During Unloading , 2013, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering.

[4]  Baohua Guo,et al.  Improvement of methane drainage in high gassy coal seam using waterjet technique , 2009 .

[5]  Fangtian Wang,et al.  Implementation of underground longhole directional drilling technology for greenhouse gas mitigation in Chinese coal mines , 2012 .

[6]  Xiexing Miao,et al.  Linking gas-sorption induced changes in coal permeability to directional strains through a modulus reduction ratio , 2010 .

[7]  Ian D. Palmer,et al.  How Permeability Depends on Stress and Pore Pressure in Coalbeds: A New Model , 1998 .

[8]  Joan Esterle,et al.  Controls on coal cleat spacing , 2010 .

[9]  Liang Yuan,et al.  Effect of bedding structural diversity of coal on permeability evolution and gas disasters control with coal mining , 2014, Natural Hazards.

[10]  Tingkan Lu,et al.  Improving the gate road development rate and reducing outburst occurrences using the waterjet technique in high gas content outburst-prone soft coal seam , 2011 .

[11]  L. Connell,et al.  Modelling permeability for coal reservoirs: A review of analytical models and testing data , 2012 .

[12]  C. Özgen Karacan,et al.  Coal mine methane: A review of capture and utilization practices with benefits to mining safety and to greenhouse gas reduction , 2011 .

[13]  Xiao Ying-qi,et al.  Numerical Simulation and Analysis of Effect of Stress Release and Permeability Improvement in Coal Seams by Deep-hole Presplitting Explosion , 2008 .

[14]  J. P. Seidle,et al.  Application of Matchstick Geometry To Stress Dependent Permeability in Coals , 1992 .

[15]  Luke D. Connell,et al.  Modelling of anisotropic coal swelling and its impact on permeability behaviour for primary and enhanced coalbed methane recovery , 2011 .

[16]  Lin Bai-qua.  Gas Control of Single Low Permeability Coal Seam Based on High-pressure Jet Slotting Technology , 2013 .

[17]  Zhongwei Chen,et al.  Laboratory Study of Gas Permeability and Cleat Compressibility for CBM/ECBM in Chinese Coals , 2012 .

[18]  F. Gu,et al.  Analysis of Coalbed Methane Production by Reservoir and Geomechanical Coupling Simulation , 2005 .

[19]  Yong Liu,et al.  A new method of drilling long boreholes in low permeability coal by improving its permeability , 2010 .

[20]  Judith Gurney.  BP Statistical Review of World Energy , 1985 .

[21]  Sevket Durucan,et al.  Drawdown Induced Changes in Permeability of Coalbeds: A New Interpretation of the Reservoir Response to Primary Recovery , 2004 .

[22]  Baiquan Lin,et al.  Application of pressure relief and permeability increased by slotting a coal seam with a rotary type cutter working across rock layers , 2012 .

[23]  Luke D. Connell,et al.  An analytical coal permeability model for tri-axial strain and stress conditions , 2010 .

[24]  J. Olson,et al.  Characteristics and origins of coal cleat: A review , 1998 .

[25]  R. Marc Bustin,et al.  Volumetric strain associated with methane desorption and its impact on coalbed gas production from deep coal seams , 2005 .

[26]  Zhao Jun-jie,et al.  Study on mining the protective seam with the manless working face in coal and gas outburst mines , 2009 .

[27]  Chen Sun,et al.  Technology and application of pressure relief and permeability increase by jointly drilling and slotting coal , 2012 .

[28]  E. T. Brown,et al.  Rock Mechanics: For Underground Mining , 1985 .