Increased Evaporative Rates in Laboratory Testing Conditions Simulating Airplane Cabin Relative Humidity: An Important Factor for Dry Eye Syndrome

Purpose. To quantitatively explore the relationship between low relative humidity conditions, as experienced in airplane cabins during flight, and increases in aqueous tear evaporation as a potential explanation for increased dry eye symptoms noted by people when in low humidity environmental conditions. Methods. Prospective experimental laboratory study. Evaporative rates under two different ranges of increasing relative humidity, from 20% to 25% (similar to the relative humidity in airplane cabins or arid regions) and from 40% to 45% (similar to the relative humidity in nonarid regions), were obtained from 18 patients with dry eye and 11 healthy subjects. Results. Statistically significant differences were found within all groups: patients with dry eye (divided into keratoconjunctivitis sicca [P=0.001] and meibomian gland dysfunction [P=0.007]) and healthy subjects (P≤0.001). The mean increase in evaporative rate across all study subjects was 99.72% (P≤0.001) when the eyes were exposed to the lower humidity condition. Conclusions. These studies quantitatively show the negative impact of environmental low relative humidity conditions, including those associated with commercial airplane travel, on aqueous tear evaporation dynamics. The increased evaporative rate is similar in healthy subjects and patients with dry eye. These findings provide useful data for the development and evaluation of treatment paradigms for any person who notes dry eye symptoms in low relative humidity environments.

[1]  W. Feuer,et al.  Correlation of tear fluorescein clearance and Schirmer test scores with ocular irritation symptoms. , 1999, Ophthalmology.

[2]  J. McCulley,et al.  Correlations in a change in aqueous tear evaporation with a change in relative humidity and the impact. , 2006, American journal of ophthalmology-glaucoma.

[3]  G. Ousler,et al.  Dry eye syndromes: diagnosis, clinical trials and pharmaceutical treatment--'improving clinical trials'. , 2002, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[4]  W. Mathers,et al.  Tear flow and evaporation in patients with and without dry eye. , 1996, Ophthalmology.

[5]  M. Refojo,et al.  Tear evaporimeter for measuring water evaporation rate from the tear film under controlled conditions in humans. , 1983, Experimental eye research.

[6]  D. Mccarty,et al.  Survey of dry eye symptoms in Australian pilots , 2000, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.

[7]  Shigeru Kinoshita,et al.  Effect of environmental conditions on tear dynamics in soft contact lens wearers. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[8]  W. Mathers,et al.  Ocular Water Evaporation and the Dry Eye: A New Measuring Device , 1993, Cornea.

[9]  J. McCulley,et al.  Presumed hyposecretory/hyperevaporative KCS: tear characteristics. , 2003, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.

[10]  N. L. Nagda,et al.  Low relative humidity and aircraft cabin air quality. , 2001, Indoor air.

[11]  G. Ousler,et al.  Evaluation of the time to "natural compensation" in normal and dry eye subject populations during exposure to a controlled adverse environment. , 2002, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[12]  B. Munoz,et al.  Relation between signs and symptoms of dry eye in the elderly. A population-based perspective. , 1997, Ophthalmology.

[13]  R. Dana,et al.  Epidemiology of dry eye syndrome. , 2000, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[14]  Jason J Nichols,et al.  The Lack of Association Between Signs and Symptoms in Patients With Dry Eye Disease , 2004, Cornea.